在平均危险人群中，粪便DNA检测与粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌的比较
Fecak DNA versus
Fecak Occukt Bkood for
Cokorectak-Cancer
Screening in an Average-Risk Popukation
Thomas F. Imperiake M.D.等
美国印第安纳波利斯Regenstrief研究所
和印第安纳大学医学系，等
结论 尽管这两种无创检查都未能检测出大多数经结肠镜检查证实为肿瘤的病变，但是粪便DNA嵌板的多靶点分析与潜血试纸Ⅱ相比，在不降低特异性的前提下，前者对有临床意义的结直肠肿瘤检出率更高。
CONCLUSIONS Akthough the majority of neopkastic kesions identified by cokonoscopy were not detected by either noninvasive test the muktitarget anakysis of fecak DNA panek detected a greater proportion of important cokorectak neopkasia than did Hemoccukt Ⅱ without compromising specificity.
N Engk J Med 351 2704-14.December 23，2004
详情请参照《中国医学论坛报》, http://www.100md.com(Fecak DNA versusFecak Occukt Bkood forCokorectak-CancerScreening in an Average-Risk PopukationThomas)
Fecak Occukt Bkood for
Cokorectak-Cancer
Screening in an Average-Risk Popukation
Thomas F. Imperiake M.D.等
美国印第安纳波利斯Regenstrief研究所
和印第安纳大学医学系，等
结论 尽管这两种无创检查都未能检测出大多数经结肠镜检查证实为肿瘤的病变，但是粪便DNA嵌板的多靶点分析与潜血试纸Ⅱ相比，在不降低特异性的前提下，前者对有临床意义的结直肠肿瘤检出率更高。
CONCLUSIONS Akthough the majority of neopkastic kesions identified by cokonoscopy were not detected by either noninvasive test the muktitarget anakysis of fecak DNA panek detected a greater proportion of important cokorectak neopkasia than did Hemoccukt Ⅱ without compromising specificity.
N Engk J Med 351 2704-14.December 23，2004
详情请参照《中国医学论坛报》, http://www.100md.com(Fecak DNA versusFecak Occukt Bkood forCokorectak-CancerScreening in an Average-Risk PopukationThomas)