单纯性肾囊肿经皮穿刺硬化和腹腔镜去顶术对比研究
囊肿,肾囊肿,B超,经皮穿刺,腹腔镜,1资料与方法,2结果,3讨论,参考文献
【摘要】 目的 探讨经皮穿刺硬化术和腹腔镜去顶术在单纯性肾囊肿治疗中的价值。 方法 45例单纯性肾囊肿,采用经皮穿刺硬化24例,腹腔镜去顶术21例。对临床疗效、术后恢复及费用进行对比研究。 结果 经皮穿刺硬化和腹腔镜去顶减压术两组疗效比较差别无显著性,P>0.05(P=0.432)。穿刺硬化组无术后并发症,腹腔镜组术后并发症发生率为14%(3/21),穿刺硬化组的平均住院时间为10d,术后住院时间为3d,腹腔镜组为16d和10d,两组总住院时间和术后住院时间比较差异均有非常显著性,P均<0.01(P值分别为0.003和0.001)。同年两组的住院及手术费用比较差异也有显著性,穿刺硬化组各项费用明显较低。 结论 经皮穿刺硬化和腹腔镜去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿对比,疗效相似,但前者创伤小、痛苦小、恢复快、并发症少、费用低、可以门诊施治,应作为单纯性肾囊肿的首选治疗方法。关键词 肾囊肿 B超 经皮穿刺 腹腔镜
A comparison of percutaneous sclerotherapy guided by ultrasound withlaparoscopic de-roofing in the management of simple renal cysts
Ruan Yashi,Jing Hao
Department of Urology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University,Changzhou213003.
【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate percutaneous sclerotherapy and laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of simple renal cysts.Methods 45patients with simple renal cysts were operated using sclerotherapy in24cases and la-paroscopy in21cases.The clinical effectiveness,post-operative recovery and expenditure of these two groups were com-pared.Results There was no difference between sclerotherapy and laparoscopic de-roofing(P>0.05 ......
您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 9143 字符。