当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《新英格兰医药杂志》 > 2006年第8期 > 正文
编号:11330393
China's One-Child Family Policy
http://www.100md.com 《新英格兰医药杂志》2006年第8期
     To the Editor: Hesketh and colleagues (Sept. 15 issue)1 provide an interesting survey of the effects of the infamous Chinese one-child policy after 25 years. However, I was somewhat taken aback by the authors' editorial statement that "relaxation of the policy can be considered only if fertility aspirations are such that a baby boom will not result." Certainly, this is the same sort of argument that tyrannical regimes have given for continuing their oppressive policies, from apartheid and dictatorships to the oppression of women and just about any other human-rights violation through history. The policy of one child per family has been a terrible violation of the personal rights of millions of Chinese women. All that is necessary for the draconian policy to be removed, not just "relaxed," is for the Chinese government to make the decision to stop such repressive measures and start dealing with the problems posed by an expanding population through moral means. I am disappointed to see the "ends justify the means" logic endorsed and unchallenged on the pages of a respectable medical journal.4ti, http://www.100md.com

    Thomas R. Jackson, M.D.4ti, http://www.100md.com

    Ireland Army Community Hospital

    Fort Knox, KY 40121ff](g, 百拇医药

    Referencesff](g, 百拇医药

    Hesketh T, Lu L, Xing ZW. The effect of China's one-child family policy after 25 years. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1171-1176.ff](g, 百拇医药

    The authors reply: We agree that the one-child policy is a violation of the human right to reproductive choice, as we acknowledge in our article. It is precisely for this reason that it is so controversial. But we should not judge the Chinese by Western standards. Few Chinese see the policy as a human-rights violation. Most (though not all) accept it with equanimity, even in the cities where the one-child rule is enforced. This is perhaps less surprising when one considers the overcrowding in Chinese cities, the pressures of child care with two working parents (as is usually the case), and the high cost of raising children.ff](g, 百拇医药

    The Chinese authorities would argue that the policy has contributed to improvements in human rights by lifting more than 200 million people out of poverty and by raising living standards for the majority of the population. In an increasingly interdependent world, where available natural resources per capita are decreasing, the Chinese government should perhaps be applauded for having the courage to take unpopular measures to control population growth.ff](g, 百拇医药

    Therese Hesketh, Ph.D.ff](g, 百拇医药

    Institute of Child Healthff](g, 百拇医药

    London WC1N1EH, United Kingdomff](g, 百拇医药

    t.hesketh@ich.ucl.ac.ukff](g, 百拇医药

    Zhu Wei Xing, M.P.H.ff](g, 百拇医药

    Zhejiang Universityff](g, 百拇医药

    Hangzhou 310006, China