当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《华西口腔医学杂志》 > 2012年第3期
编号:12826072
微焦点计算机断层扫描术评价根管再治疗中不同器械根管清理效果的研究(4)
http://www.100md.com 2012年3月1日 郭婧 尹恺丰 杨海兵 韩萱 王燕
第1页

    参见附件。

     [9] Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, et al. Efficacy of diffe-rent rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal re-treatment[J]. J Endod, 2006, 32(5):469-472.

    [10] Gergi R, Sabbagh C. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: An ex vivo study[J]. Int Endod J, 2007, 40(7):532-537.

    [11] Masiero AV, Barletta FB. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment[J]. Int Endod J, 2005,38(1):2-7.

    [12] Cunha RS, De Martin AS, Barros PP, et al. In vitro evaluation of the cleansing working time and analysis of the amount of gutta-percha or Resilon remnants in the root canal walls after instru-mentation for endodontic retreatment[J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(12):1426-1428.

    [13] Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Peters DD, et al. Microcomputed to-mography: An advanced system for detailed endodontic research [J]. J Endod, 1995, 21(11):561-568.

    [14] Giuliani V, Cocchetti R, Pagavino G. Efficacy of ProTaper univer-sal retreatment files in removing filling materials during root canal retreatment[J]. J Endod, 2008, 34(11):1381-1384.

    [15] Pirani C, Pelliccioni GA, Marchionni S, et al. Effectiveness of three different retreatment techniques in canals filled with compacted gutta-percha or Thermafil: A scanning electron microscope study [J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(10):1433-1440.

    (本文编辑 杜冰)

    [ 收稿日期 ]2011-04-15;[ 修回日期 ]2012-01-11

    [ 基金项目 ]山东大学自主创新基金自然科学专项基金资助项目(交叉学科培育项目)(2011JC019)

    [ 作者简介 ]郭婧(1985—),女,北京人,硕士

    [ 通讯作者 ]王燕,Tel:0531-88382623

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件