预见性创伤护理对急诊创伤救治效果的影响
【摘 要】 目的： 分析创伤患者接受急诊救治期间辅以预见性护理干预的临床效果。 方法： 本次选取2018年7月-2019年7月我院急诊科收治创伤患者92例作为观察目标，根据时间先后顺序分为观察组与对照组，对照组患者急诊救治期间辅以常规护理，观察组患者急诊救治期间辅以预见性护理，记录各组患者临床相关指标。 结果： 观察组患者救治总有效率明显高于对照组(p<0.05)，另外，观察组患者开始急诊时间(3.51±0.44)min、有效抢救时间(45.99±5.42)min均短于对照组，且满意度评分高于对照组(p<0.05)。 结论： 创伤患者接受急诊救治过程中辅以预见性护理干预效果更佳，能够更快实施救治，患者满意度更高，值得推广应用。
【关键词】 预见性创伤护理;创伤救治
【中图分类号】 R969.4 【文献标志码】B 【文章编号】1005-0019(2020)05-011-01
, http://www.100md.com The effect of predictive trauma nursing on emergency trauma treatment
Wang Miaomiao
Emergency Surgery， First People's Hospital of Jining City， Jining 272000， China
Abstract：
Objective： To analyze the clinical effect of predictive nursing intervention during emergency treatment for traumatic patients. Methods： The selected in this study， 92 trauma patients in emergency department of our hospital from July 2018 to July 2019 were selected as observation objects. According to the time sequence， they were divided into observation group and control group. The patients in control group were assisted with routine nursing during emergency treatment， and the patients in observation group were assisted with predictive nursing during emergency treatment. The treatment effects of the two groups were compared，Clinical related indicators of patients. Results： The total effective rate of treatment of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). In addition， the duration of emergency treatment (3.51±0.44) min and effective rescue time (45.99±5.42) min of patients in the observation group were both shorter than that of the control group， and the satisfaction score was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion： The effect of predictive nursing intervention in emergency treatment of traumatic patients is better， it can implement treatment faster， and patients'satisfaction is higher， which is worthy of popularization and application.
, 百拇医药
Key words： Predictive trauma nursing;Trauma treatment
由于创伤患者病情相对复杂，且易合并多种并发症，因此，救护难度较高，应重视创伤患者的护理工作 [1] 。本文以2018.7-2019.7我院收治92例创伤患者为例，探究预见性护理干预的应用价值，具体如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
本次选取2018年7月-2019年7月我院急诊科收治创伤患者92例作为观察目标，根据时间先后顺序分为观察组与对照组，对照组总计患者46例，包括男性23例，女性23例，最低年龄30岁，最高年龄65歲，平均年龄(47.1±1.4)岁，因交通意外致伤患者17例，因高空坠落致伤患者12例，因刀刺致伤患者9例，因其他原因致伤患者8例。观察组总计患者46例，包括男性24例，女性22例，最低年龄31岁，最高年龄64岁，平均年龄(47.2±1.3)岁，因交通意外致伤患者18例，因高空坠落致伤患者11例，因刀刺致伤患者10例，因其他原因致伤患者7例。经统计分析发现，两组患者基本资料无统计学意义(p>0.05)，可对比。, http://www.100md.com(王苗苗)
【关键词】 预见性创伤护理;创伤救治
【中图分类号】 R969.4 【文献标志码】B 【文章编号】1005-0019(2020)05-011-01
, http://www.100md.com The effect of predictive trauma nursing on emergency trauma treatment
Wang Miaomiao
Emergency Surgery， First People's Hospital of Jining City， Jining 272000， China
Abstract：
Objective： To analyze the clinical effect of predictive nursing intervention during emergency treatment for traumatic patients. Methods： The selected in this study， 92 trauma patients in emergency department of our hospital from July 2018 to July 2019 were selected as observation objects. According to the time sequence， they were divided into observation group and control group. The patients in control group were assisted with routine nursing during emergency treatment， and the patients in observation group were assisted with predictive nursing during emergency treatment. The treatment effects of the two groups were compared，Clinical related indicators of patients. Results： The total effective rate of treatment of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). In addition， the duration of emergency treatment (3.51±0.44) min and effective rescue time (45.99±5.42) min of patients in the observation group were both shorter than that of the control group， and the satisfaction score was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion： The effect of predictive nursing intervention in emergency treatment of traumatic patients is better， it can implement treatment faster， and patients'satisfaction is higher， which is worthy of popularization and application.
, 百拇医药
Key words： Predictive trauma nursing;Trauma treatment
由于创伤患者病情相对复杂，且易合并多种并发症，因此，救护难度较高，应重视创伤患者的护理工作 [1] 。本文以2018.7-2019.7我院收治92例创伤患者为例，探究预见性护理干预的应用价值，具体如下。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
本次选取2018年7月-2019年7月我院急诊科收治创伤患者92例作为观察目标，根据时间先后顺序分为观察组与对照组，对照组总计患者46例，包括男性23例，女性23例，最低年龄30岁，最高年龄65歲，平均年龄(47.1±1.4)岁，因交通意外致伤患者17例，因高空坠落致伤患者12例，因刀刺致伤患者9例，因其他原因致伤患者8例。观察组总计患者46例，包括男性24例，女性22例，最低年龄31岁，最高年龄64岁，平均年龄(47.2±1.3)岁，因交通意外致伤患者18例，因高空坠落致伤患者11例，因刀刺致伤患者10例，因其他原因致伤患者7例。经统计分析发现，两组患者基本资料无统计学意义(p>0.05)，可对比。, http://www.100md.com(王苗苗)