当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国性科学》 > 2011年第7期
编号:12110749
剖宫产与阴道分娩后因症取环的比较分析
http://www.100md.com 2011年7月1日 《中国性科学》 2011年第7期
剖宫产与阴道分娩后因症取环的比较分析
剖宫产与阴道分娩后因症取环的比较分析

     【摘 要】 目的:比较剖宫产与阴道分娩两种分娩方式对采用宫内节育器避孕后因症取环的时间及原因。方法:对267例因症取环进行回顾性统计分析。结果:两种分娩方式因症取环与育龄妇女的年龄、产次、放置环种类和出血、腹痛、环位异常的症状类别无统计学意义;剖宫产史者出现症状的时间明显早于阴道分娩者。结论:对于有剖宫产史的疤痕子宫病例,不能单纯按常规方法探得的宫腔长度选择宫内节育器,以减少此类患者在上环早期即出现不适症状而取环的比率。

    【关键词】 剖宫产; 阴道分娩; 因症取环

    Cesarean section and vaginal delivery for comparative analysis of patients from Central

    SU Jie,YAN Shao,ZHANG Jianying, TAN Yianhong

    Shenzhen Longgang District Family Planning Services Center, Guangdong 518100, China

    【Abstract】 Objectives: Cesarean section compared with vaginal delivery on the use of two delivery methods of intrauterine contraceptive devices, the result of disease and the reasons for taking the time ring. Methods: 257 patients from Central for retrospective statistical analysis. Results: The two kinds of mode of delivery for women of childbearing age patients from Central and age, parity, place the ring type and bleeding, abdominal pain, type of ring bit unusual symptoms were no statistical significance; a history of cesarean delivery was significantly earlier time of onset of symptoms in vaginal delivery. Conclusion: For cases of cesarean uterine scar on the history, not simply obtained by conventional methods cavity length of the probe selection IUD to reduce such patients appears in the ring early symptoms and the rate of intrauterine devices. ......

您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 5433 字符