当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《健康必读·中旬刊》 > 2012年第6期 > 正文
编号:12279521
对86例老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效分析
http://www.100md.com 2012年6月1日 刘敏
第1页

    参见附件。

     摘要:目的:分析老年股骨颈骨折不同术式的临床效果,为临床治疗提供参考依据。方法:对86例老年股骨颈骨折患者,采取内固定、半髋关节置换、全髋关节置换3种手术,对比分析临床疗效。结果:内固定组患者损伤最小,全髋损伤最大;内固定组住院时间短,但术后恢复时间延迟,并发症也显著高于关节置换组;Harris髋关节评分:内固定组比关节置换组效果均差,全髋置换效果最好,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:治疗老年股骨颈骨折,要根据具体情况选择手术方式,才能提高治疗效果,保证患者的生活质量。

    关键词:老年股骨颈骨折;内固定;半髋置换;全髋置换;效果

    Abstract:Objective:analysis old femoral neck fracture the clinical effect of different operative methods, provide a reference basis for clinical treatment. Methods:86 cases of elderly patients with fracture of the femoral neck, take internal fixation, half a hip replacement, total hip replacement 3 kinds of surgery, a comparative analysis of the clinical curative effect. Results:fixed group in patients with minimal damage, total hip injury most; Fixed group within short time in hospital, but the postoperative recovery time delay, complication is also significantly higher joint replacement group; harris hip score: internal fixation group than in the joint replacement group effect are poor, a total hip replacement best effect, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion:care of elderly femoral neck fracture, according to the specific circumstances of choosing surgery way, can improve the treatment effect, ensure the quality of life of the patients.

    Key words:Older femoral neck fractures; Internal fixation; Half a hip replacement; Total hip replacement; effect

    【中图分类号】R473.6 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1672-3783(2012)06-0201-01

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(1507kb)