恶性肿瘤患者的心理护理干预效果分析(1)
 |
| 第1页 |
参见附件。
[摘要] 目的 探讨恶性肿瘤患者的心理护理干预效果。 方法 将我院80例临床确诊的恶性肿瘤患者随机分为研究组与对照组，每组各40例。对照组患者给予常规护理，研究组患者在常规护理基础上给予心理护理干预，比较两组患者治疗前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分及汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分情况。 结果 研究组治疗后SAS评分及SDS评分均较治疗前及对照组显著降低，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)；HAMA评分及HAMD评分亦较治疗前及对照组显著降低，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。对照组治疗后SAS评分、SDS评分、HAMA评分及HAMD评分与治疗前比较均无明显改善(P > 0.05)。 结论 实施合理的心理护理干预能够显著改善恶性肿瘤患者的焦虑、抑郁负性心理，为临床制订恶性肿瘤患者的护理方案提供参考。
[关键词] 恶性肿瘤；心理护理；焦虑；抑郁
[中图分类号] R473.73 [文献标识码] C [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)08(b)-0125-02
Mental nursing intervention for patients with malignant tumors
LIU Jihong
Department of Medical Oncology, Cangzhou Central Hospital of Cangzhou City, Hebei Province, Cangzhou 061001, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of mental nursing intervention for patients with malignant tumors. Methods A total of 80 patients with malignant tumors confirmed in clinic were randomly divided into study group and control group with 40 patients in each group. Control group received routine nursing care, and study group additionally received mental nursing intervention, the SAS scores, SDS scores, HAMA scores and HAMD scores before and after treatment in two groups were compared. Results After treatment, SAS scores and SDS scores in study group were statistically decreased than those before treatment and control group (P < 0.05), HAMA scores and HAMD scores were also significantly decreased than those before treatment and control group (P < 0.05). But no statistical difference in SAS scores, SDS scores, HAMA scores and HAMD scores was observed before and after treatment in control group (P > 0.05). Conclusion Reasonable mental nursing intervention can obviously improve the negative motions such as dysphoria and depression for patients with malignant tumors, and it can provide reference for working out nursing proposals for patients with malignant tumors ......
您现在查看是摘要介绍页，详见PDF附件(2135kb)。