婵犵妲呴崑鎾跺緤妤e啯鍋嬮柣妯款嚙杩濋梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷
闂傚倷绀侀幖顐︽偋韫囨稑绐楅幖娣妼閸ㄥ倿鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘: 闂佽娴烽弫濠氬磻婵犲洤绐楅柡鍥╁枔閳瑰秴鈹戦悩鍙夋悙婵☆偅锕㈤弻娑㈠Ψ閵忊剝鐝栭悷婊冨簻閹凤拷 闂傚倷绶氬ḿ鑽ゆ嫻閻旂厧绀夐幖娣妼閸氬綊骞栧ǎ顒€鐏柍缁樻礋閺屻劑寮崹顔规寖濠电偟銆嬮幏锟� 闂備浇宕垫慨宥夊礃椤垳鐥梻浣告惈椤戝倿宕滃┑鍫㈢煓濠㈣泛澶囬崑鎾绘晲鎼粹€崇缂備椒绶ら幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳舵灙妞ゆ垵鍟村畷鏇㈡焼瀹ュ懐鐣洪悗骞垮劚椤︻垳鐥閺屾稓浠﹂悙顒傛缂備胶濯撮幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳堕、濠勭礄娴兼潙纾块梺顒€绉撮崹鍌炴煛閸愩劎澧涢柣鎺曨嚙椤法鎹勯搹鍦紘濠碉紕鍎戦幏锟� 闂傚倷鑳剁涵鍫曞疾閻愭祴鏋嶉柨婵嗩槶閳ь兛绶氬畷銊╁级閹寸媭妲洪梺鑽ゅТ濞层倕螣婵犲洤绀夐柨鐕傛嫹 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰鐠囧唽缂氭繛鍡樺灱婵娊鏌曟径鍡樻珔缂佲偓瀹€鍕仯闁搞儜鍕ㄦ灆闂佸憡妫戦幏锟� 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傚ù鍏兼儗閺佸棝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂備浇顕х€涒晠宕樻繝姘挃闁告洦鍓氶崣蹇涙煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鍌ㄩ柣鎾崇瘍閻熸嫈鏃堝川椤撶媭妲洪梺鑽ゅТ濞层倕螣婵犲洤绀夐柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犮€冭箛娑樼;闁糕剝绋戦弸渚€鏌熼幑鎰靛殭缂佺姵鍨块弻锟犲礋椤愶絿顩伴梺鍝ュ櫐閹凤拷
婵犵數鍎戠徊钘壝洪敂鐐床闁稿本绋撻々鐑芥煥閻曞倹瀚�: 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹閻戣棄纭€闁告劕妯婂〒濠氭煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂備浇宕垫慨鏉懨洪妶鍥e亾濮樼厧鐏︽い銏$懇閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 闂備浇宕甸崰鎰版偡閵夈儙娑樷槈閵忕姷锛涢梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂備焦鐪归崺鍕垂闁秵鍋ら柡鍥ュ灪閸庡﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂惇褰掑磹閺囩喐娅犻柦妯侯樈濞兼牠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂惇褰掑磿閸楃伝娲Ω閿旇棄寮块梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂傚倷鑳舵灙缂佺粯顨呴悾鐑芥偨缁嬫寧鐎梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 闂傚倷鑳堕崕鐢稿磻閹捐绀夐煫鍥ㄦ尵閺嗐倝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳堕、濠勭礄娴兼潙纾规俊銈呮噹缁犳牠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬鏍礂濞嗘挸纾块柡灞诲劚閻ら箖鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳舵灙妞ゆ垵鍟村畷鏇㈠箻椤旂瓔妫呴梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 缂傚倸鍊搁崐绋棵洪妶鍡╂闁归棿绶¢弫濠囨煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰閸洖纾归柡宥庡幖閻掑灚銇勯幒鎴敾閻庢熬鎷� 闂傚倷鑳堕崢褍顕i幆鑸汗闁告劦鍠栫粈澶愭煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂傚倷鐒﹀鍨熆娓氣偓楠炲繘鏁撻敓锟� 婵犵數濞€濞佳囧磻婵犲洤绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷鑳堕崢褎鎯斿⿰鍫濈闁跨噦鎷� 闂備浇顕х换鎰殽韫囨稑绠柨鐕傛嫹 闂傚倷鐒﹂幃鍫曞磿閼碱剛鐭欓柟杈惧瘜閺佸棝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂備浇宕垫慨鏉懨洪埡浣烘殾闁割煈鍋呭▍鐘绘煥閻曞倹瀚� 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐⒚洪敃鈧玻鍨枎閹惧秴娲弫鎾绘晸閿燂拷
婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鍌ㄩ柤娴嬫櫃閻掑﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘: 闂備焦鐪归崺鍕垂闁秵鍋ら柡鍥ュ灪閸庡﹪鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囧銊╂倿閿曞倹鍋¢柨鏇楀亾瀹€锝呮健閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟� 闂傚倷娴囬鏍礈濮樿鲸宕查柛鈩冪☉閻掑灚銇勯幒鎴敾閻庢熬鎷� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箹閳哄懎鐭楅柍褜鍓涢埀顒冾潐閹碱偊骞忛敓锟� 闂傚倷绀侀幉锟犳偋閻愯尙鏆﹂柣銏⑶圭粻鏍煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犵數鍋為崹鍫曞箰鐠囧唽缂氭繛鍡樺灱婵娊鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥涢崟顖涘亱闁圭偓妞块弫渚€鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 濠电姵顔栭崰妤勬懌闂佹悶鍔忓▔娑滅亱闂佽法鍣﹂幏锟� 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹缁嬫5娲Χ閸ワ絽浜剧痪鏉款槹鐎氾拷 闂傚倷鐒﹂崹婵嬫倿閿曞倸桅闁绘劗鏁哥粈濠囨煥閻曞倹瀚� 婵犲痉鏉库偓妤佹叏閹绢喖瀚夋い鎺戝閽冪喖鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鐒﹂幃鍫曞磿閹绘帞鏆︽俊顖欒濞尖晠鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 婵犵绱曢崑娑㈩敄閸ヮ剙绐楅柟鎹愵嚙閸戠娀鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傞柧蹇e亝濞呯娀鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傛い鏍ㄧ矌缁犳棃鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷娴囬崑鎰版偤閺冨牆鍨傞柟娈垮枤閸楁岸鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷绀侀幖顐﹀磹鐟欏嫬鍨旈柦妯侯槺閺嗐倝鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷鑳堕幊鎾诲触鐎n剙鍨濋幖娣妼绾惧ジ鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘 闂傚倷绀侀崥瀣i幒鎾变粓闁归棿绀侀崙鐘绘煥閻曞倹瀚�
当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《医药产业资讯》 > 2015年第5期 > 正文
编号:12619852
血清肿瘤标志物对Ⅰ~Ⅱ期宫颈小细胞癌预后的预测价值(1)

     [摘要] 目的 探讨宫颈小细胞癌(SCCC)治疗前血清肿瘤标志物表达在宫颈小细胞癌预后中的预测价值。 方法 回顾性分析2004年4月~2014年4月在浙江省肿瘤医院接受治疗的50例Ⅰ~Ⅱ期SCCC患者的临床资料,分析患者治疗前血清肿瘤标志物CA125、CA199、CEA、SCC的表达水平与患者预后的关系。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行单因素生存分析,以Log-rank test确定统计学上的显著差异,采用Cox比例风险模型进行多因素生存分析。 结果 所有患者治疗前均接受血清肿瘤标志物的检测并均接受手术及化疗。随访截至2014年9月10日,全组患者中位无进展生存时间36.4个月,1、3年及5年无进展生存率分别为64.8%、47.9%和47.9%。血清肿瘤标志物CA125、CA199、CEA、SCC阳性患者的平均无进展生存期及3、5年生存率较CA125、CA199、CEA、SCC阴性患者低。单因素分析发现治疗前血清肿瘤标志物CA125、CA199、CEA、SCC阳性及阴性患者的生存率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。联合盆腔放疗及术后病理高危因素(深间质受侵、脉管瘤栓、盆腔淋巴结阳性)均可影响患者无进展生存期(P < 0.05),脉管瘤栓是影响患者预后的独立因素(OR = 4.564,P = 0.033)。 结论 目前尚不能明确治疗前血清肿瘤标志物CA125、CA199、CEA、SCC表达水平可以预测Ⅰ~Ⅱ期SCCC患者预后。血清肿瘤标志物对SCCC患者预后的影响值得临床进一步研究。

    [关键词] 小细胞癌;宫颈肿瘤;肿瘤标志物;预后

    [中图分类号] R737.33 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2015)02(b)-0022-06

    [Abstract] Objective To investigate the prognostic value of serum tumor markers before treatment for FIGO stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ small cell carcinoma of the cervix. Methods Clinical data of 50 patients with small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) from April 2004 to April 2014 treated in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The relationships between the expression of serum tumor markers CA125, CA199, CEA, SCC before treatment and the prognosis of patients were analyzed. Single factor analysis was performed by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The statistical significance was determined by the Log-rank test. Multi-factor survival analysis was performed by using Cox proportional hazards models. Results The serum tumor markers of patients were detected before treatment, then underwent surgery and chemotherapy. Followed-up to September 10, 2014, median progression-free survival time of all patients was 36.4 months, 1, 3 years and 5 years progression-free survival rates were 64.8%, 47.9% and 47.9% respectively. Compared with the patients with negative expression of serum tumor markers CA125, CA199, CEA and SCC, the average progression-free survival and 3, 5 years progression-free survival rate of the patients with positive expression of serum CA125, CA199, CEA, and SCC were lower. Single factor analysis showed that the difference of progression-free survival between patients with serum tumor markers CA125, CA199 and CEA, SCC positive or negative before the treatment was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Patients progression-free survival time could be affected by combination pelvic radiation therapy and postoperative pathological risk factors (depth stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, pelvic lymph node involvement) (P < 0.05). In a multivariable analysis, lymphovascular space invasion for FIGO stageⅠ-Ⅱ SCCC remained as independent prognostic factor of survival (OR = 4.564,P = 0.033). Conclusion Currently, it is not clear that the serum tumor markers CA125, CA199, CEA, SCC expression level before treatment can predict the prognosis of patients with FIGO stageⅠ-Ⅱ SCCC,it is worthy of further study in the clinical practice. (殷卓敏等)
1 2 3 4 5下一页
    淇℃伅浠呬緵鍙傝€冿紝涓嶆瀯鎴愪换浣曚箣寤鸿銆佹帹鑽愭垨鎸囧紩銆傛枃绔犵増鏉冨睘浜庡師钁椾綔鏉冧汉锛岃嫢鎮ㄨ涓烘鏂囦笉瀹滆鏀跺綍渚涘ぇ瀹跺厤璐归槄璇伙紝璇烽偖浠舵垨鐢佃瘽閫氱煡鎴戜滑锛屾垜浠敹鍒伴€氱煡鍚庯紝浼氱珛鍗冲皢鎮ㄧ殑浣滃搧浠庢湰缃戠珯鍒犻櫎銆�

   寰俊鏂囩珷  鍏虫敞鐧炬媷  璇勮鍑犲彞  鎼滅储鏇村   鎺ㄥ瓨缁欐湅鍙�   鍔犲叆鏀惰棌