门诊输液患者全程护理管理及健康教育的应用(1)
 |
| 第1页 |
参见附件。
[摘要] 目的 探讨门诊输液患者全程护理管理健康教育的临床效果，提高服务质量。 方法 选择在我院门诊输液的患者400例作为研究对象，随机分为实验组和对照组；对照组给予常规护理模式，实验组给予全程护理模式。 结果 两组患者均顺利完成输液，输液过程中均未发生严重副反应和并发症。实验组在疾病背景知识、用药知识和生活习惯等方面均显著优于对照组，具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。实验组在操作技术、巡回检查、心理舒适等方面均显著优于对照组，具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。 结论 全程护理管理模式应用于门诊输液患者，在普及健康教育的同时，又提高了患者的心理舒适度，值得在临床推广和应用。
[关键词] 门诊输液；全程护理；健康教育
[中图分类号] R473 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2012)04-0124-02
Application of whole-course nursing management and health education in outpatients of intravenous fluid infusion
YU Hui
Injection Room of Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo 315000,China
[Abstract] Objective To improve the service quality through approaching the clinical effect of whole-course nursing management and health education on outpatients of intravenous fluid infusion. Methods All of 400 cases of outpatients who were intravenously infused fluid in our hospital were selected to this study, and were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. Routine nursing and whole-course nursing models were given the patients of control group and experimental group, respectively. Results All patients successfully completed the infusion, and no serious side effects and complications occurred during infusion. Background knowledge of disease, knowledge of medication use and living habit in experimental group were significantly superior to those in control group (P < 0.01), and the similar results were obtained for operate skill, patrol inspection and psychological comfort. Conclusion The whole-course nursing model for the outpatients of intravenous fluid infusion not only popularized health education, but also improved the patient's psychological comfort, thus worth being extended in clinical.
[Key words] Outpatient infusion; Whole-course nursing management; Health education
输液是临床使用频率很高的主要给药途径之一；由于输液时间相对较长，患者在输液治疗的过程中，容易产生种种心理和生理问题，需要给予更多的关注[1，2]。为了提高患者输液舒适度和输液质量，我们采取全程护理管理模式，收到了良好效果，现将结果报道如下，为同行提供初步的参考。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
选择2008年3月～2010年7月在我院门诊输液的患者400例作为研究对象。男293例，女107例。输液时间3～15 d，平均6 d。年龄7～78岁，平均41.8岁。文化程度：小学及其以下56例，初中及中专265例，高中及大专44例，本科及其以上35例。所有患者根据年龄、性别、病型等分为实验组和对照组，每组均200例。两组在一般资料方面无显著统计学差异，具有可比性。
1.2 方法
对照组给予常规护理模式 ......
您现在查看是摘要介绍页，详见PDF附件(2024kb)。