不同采血方法在血常规检验中的应用价值(1)
[摘要] 目的 探究在血常规检验中不同采血方式的应用价值。 方法 随机选择分析该院2016年1—12月前来接受血常规检验的患者100例作为研究对象，按照血液采集部位的不同分为对照组和观察组，分别采集末梢血液和静脉血，对比两组样本血常规检验后RBC，WBC，PLT，HCT，HGB，MCV，HCH以及MCHC结果。 结果 采集静脉血的实验组资料RBC为(6.58±1.43)×1012/L，WBC为(5.63 ± 1.01)12/L，PLT为(231±25.00)×109/L，HCT为(0.45±0.83)，HGB为(14.82±3.18)g/L，均高于采集末梢血的对照组资料[对应分别为(5.72±1.33)×109/L，(3.28±1.39)×1012/L，(208±17.00)×10%，(10.12±2.83)g/L]，且差異有统计学意义(P<0.05)；实验组MCV为(89.33±7.91)fL，MCHC为(309.3±21.83)g/L，与对照组资料(对应为[(91.93±10.85)fL和(306.8±13.86)g/L]相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 血液采集方式的不同会影响到血常规检验的结果，末梢血液的实测值与稳定性显著低于静脉血的实测值，因而采取静脉血进行血常规检验的临床应用价值就更高。
[关键词] 采血方法；血常规检验；末梢血；静脉血；应用价值
[中图分类号] R446 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)09(b)-0169-03
[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to explore the application value of different blood sampling methods in blood routine test. Methods A total of 100 patients received blood tests from January to December 2016 were random enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the different blood collection sites. Peripheral blood and venous blood were collected respectively and then RBC， WBC， PLT， HCT， HGB， MCV， HCH， and MCHC results after two sets of blood samples were compared. Results The data of RBC in the study group of venous blood was (6.58±1.43)×109/L， WBC was (5.63±1.01) ×1012/L， PLT was(231±25.00)×109/L， HCT was (0.45±0.83)， HGB was (14.82±3.18)g/L， significantly higher than the control group of the peripheral blood of(5.72±1.33) ×109/L，(3.28±1.39) ×1012/L， (208±17.00)×109/L，(10.12±2.83)g/L respectively， and the difference was significant(P<0.05)； the MCV in the study group was (89.33±7.91)fL and MCHC was (309.3± 21.83)g/L， and that in the control group was (91.93±10.85)fL and (306.8±13.86)g/L， and the difference was not significant(P>0.05). Conclusion The difference of blood collection mode will affect the results of blood test， the measured value and stability of peripheral blood are significantly lower than that of the venous blood， and thus the venous blood for routine blood test obtains higher clinical value.
[Key words] Blood collection method； Blood routine test； Peripheral blood； Venous blood； Application value
血常规检验是指采取一定方式采集血液之后，对血液中相关物质的性质进行分析比对，从而获知有关身体的信息[1]，如是否贫血，是否有感染发生，是否携带有血液疾病等[2]，从而实现尽早诊断和发现某些疾病。血常规检验所采集的血液标本一般为末梢血和静脉血。通过对红细胞，白细胞，血小板的结构，数目，形态等理化性质[3]进行测定，以此来为诊断和治疗疾病提供参考依据。该次研究中随机选取分析该院2016年1—12月前来接受血常规检验的患者100例作为研究对象，每位患者分别采集其静脉血和末梢血分为对照组和观察组，之后对两组血液样本进行血常规检验，对比分析结果，现报道如下。
1 资料与方法, 百拇医药(钱进)
[关键词] 采血方法；血常规检验；末梢血；静脉血；应用价值
[中图分类号] R446 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)09(b)-0169-03
[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to explore the application value of different blood sampling methods in blood routine test. Methods A total of 100 patients received blood tests from January to December 2016 were random enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the different blood collection sites. Peripheral blood and venous blood were collected respectively and then RBC， WBC， PLT， HCT， HGB， MCV， HCH， and MCHC results after two sets of blood samples were compared. Results The data of RBC in the study group of venous blood was (6.58±1.43)×109/L， WBC was (5.63±1.01) ×1012/L， PLT was(231±25.00)×109/L， HCT was (0.45±0.83)， HGB was (14.82±3.18)g/L， significantly higher than the control group of the peripheral blood of(5.72±1.33) ×109/L，(3.28±1.39) ×1012/L， (208±17.00)×109/L，(10.12±2.83)g/L respectively， and the difference was significant(P<0.05)； the MCV in the study group was (89.33±7.91)fL and MCHC was (309.3± 21.83)g/L， and that in the control group was (91.93±10.85)fL and (306.8±13.86)g/L， and the difference was not significant(P>0.05). Conclusion The difference of blood collection mode will affect the results of blood test， the measured value and stability of peripheral blood are significantly lower than that of the venous blood， and thus the venous blood for routine blood test obtains higher clinical value.
[Key words] Blood collection method； Blood routine test； Peripheral blood； Venous blood； Application value
血常规检验是指采取一定方式采集血液之后，对血液中相关物质的性质进行分析比对，从而获知有关身体的信息[1]，如是否贫血，是否有感染发生，是否携带有血液疾病等[2]，从而实现尽早诊断和发现某些疾病。血常规检验所采集的血液标本一般为末梢血和静脉血。通过对红细胞，白细胞，血小板的结构，数目，形态等理化性质[3]进行测定，以此来为诊断和治疗疾病提供参考依据。该次研究中随机选取分析该院2016年1—12月前来接受血常规检验的患者100例作为研究对象，每位患者分别采集其静脉血和末梢血分为对照组和观察组，之后对两组血液样本进行血常规检验，对比分析结果，现报道如下。
1 资料与方法, 百拇医药(钱进)