当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中外医疗》 > 2018年第6期
编号:13239604
临床糖尿病诊断中常规检验与生化检验的价值对比研究(1)
http://www.100md.com 2018年2月25日 《中外医疗》 2018年第6期
     [摘要] 目的 對比临床糖尿病诊断中常规检验与生化检验的价值。方法 从该院在2016年6月—2017年5月期间诊治的糖尿病患者当中方便选取110例作为该次研究对象,按照患者入院的先后顺序将患者平均分成两组,入院较早的患者定为对照组(55例),采用常规的尿液检测方法进行诊断,入院较晚的患者定为观察组(55例),采用生化检验方法进行诊断,将两组诊断的结果与临床病理诊断结果进行对比,确定最佳的临床诊断方法,明确生化检验在糖尿病诊断方面的临床应用价值。结果 两组患者检验结果和临床病理检查结果相对比,观察组患者当中与病理检查结果一致的患者53例,有效率达到了96.36%,而对照组患者当中与病理检查结果一致的患者43例,有效率达到了78.18%,两组对比差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.946 5,P<0.05)。结论 临床糖尿病诊断当中,与常规检验相比,生化检验具有更高的临床应用价值,为糖尿病患者的临床治疗提供治疗依据,提高治疗的效果,控制患者的血糖水平,挽救患者的生命,提高患者的生活质量,应该作为糖尿病诊断的首选方法,在临床上推广和应用。

    [关键词] 糖尿病;诊断;常规检验;生化检验;价值对比

    [中图分类号] R446 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)02(c)-0181-03

    Study on the Value Comparison of Routine and Biochemical Test in the Diagnosis of Clinical Diabetes

    CHEN Ye

    Laboratory Department, Guangnan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangnan, Yunnan Province, 663300 China

    [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to compare the value of routine test and biochemical test of clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Methods From June 2016 to May 2017 diagnosis and treatment of diabetic patients selected 110 cases as the object of this study, according to the order of patients admitted to hospital, were divided into two groups, the patients admitted earlier as the control group (55 cases). The routine urine test was used to diagnose the patients. Later patients admitted to the hospital were selected as the observation group (55 cases). The biochemical tests were used to diagnose the patients. The results of the two groups were compared with the results of clinicopathological diagnosis to determine the best clinical diagnostic methods and a clear biochemical test in the diagnosis of diabetes clinical value. Results Two groups of patients with test results clinical and pathological examination results were compared, the observation group patients with pathological findings consistent with 53 cases, efficiency had reached 96.36%, while the control group patients with pathological findings consistent with 43 cases, efficiency of 78.18%, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups (χ2=9.946 5, P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical diagnosis of diabetes, compared with conventional test, biochemical test has higher clinical application value, can provide basis for clinical treatment of patients with diabetes and improve the treatment effect and glucose control, save the lives of patients, and improve the quality of life of patients, which should be used as the preferred method for diagnosis of diabetes, and worth of clinical popularization and application., 百拇医药(陈业)
1 2 3下一页