当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中外医疗》 > 20209
编号:13493956
应用心肺复苏实时反馈系统开展心肺复苏培训的分析(1)
http://www.100md.com 2020年3月25日 《中外医疗》 20209
     [摘要] 目的 探討心肺复苏实时反馈系统在心肺复苏培训中的应用效果。方法 方便选择2018年1月—2019年1月该院160名医务人员作为该次研究对象,将其随机分为观察组与对照组,两组各有80名医务人员,对照组应用高仿真模拟人法开展心肺复苏培训,观察组在对照组基础上应用心肺复苏实时反馈系统开展心肺复苏培训,对比两组医务人员心肺复苏的理论知识与实操技能考核成绩。结果 观察组医务人员的的理论知识评分(92.26±5.75)分,对照组(92.57±5.43)分,对比差异无统计学意义(t=0.351,P=0.726);观察组80名医务人员的平均有效按压率(79.29±19.13)%要显著高于对照组(30.13±22.46)%,差异有统计学意义(t=14.904,P=0.000)。观察组80名医务人员的平均按压深度、按压频率、胸廓回弹率(5.43±0.36)cm、(113.56±4.89)次/min、(5.75±1.43)s、(97.23±0.54)%均要显著优于对照组(4.86±2.14)cm、(100.47±12.16)次/min、(9.98±1.22)s、(82.32±3.02)%高(t=2.349、4.838、20.128、43.469),过度通气率(1.42±1.33)%均要显著比对照组(7.93±6.79)%低(t=9.708)差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 心肺复苏实时反馈系统在心肺复苏培训中具有显著应用效果,可显著提高心肺复苏质量。

    [关键词] 心肺复苏实时反馈系统;心肺复苏培训;医务人员

    [中图分类号] R726 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2020)03(c)-0076-03

    Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Using Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Real-time Feedback System

    FENG Xi-xuan, LIU Shu-yan, LU Li-feng, LIAO Jia-bao,CAO Wen-wei

    Department of Emergency, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong Province, 528308 China

    [Abstract] Objective To explore the application effect of real-time feedback system in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training. Methods From January 2018 to January 2019 in the 160 employees as the research object, its were convenient randomly divided into observation group and control group, two groups of the 80 medical staff, the control group used high simulation method to carry out the training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), observation group in the control group based on the application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) real-time feedback system for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, compared two groups of theoretical knowledge of medical staff cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and speaking skill examination results. Results The theoretical knowledge score of the medical staff in the observation group was (92.26±5.75)points, and the control group was (92.57±5.43)points. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=0.351, P=0.726). The average effective compression of 80 medical staff in the observation group The rate of (79.29±19.13)% was significantly higher than that of the control group by (30.13±22.46)%, and the difference was statistically significant (t=14.904, P=0.000). The average compression depth, compression frequency, and thoracic rebound rate of the medical staff of the observation group were (5.43±0.36)cm, (113.56±4.89)times/min, (5.75±1.43)s, and (97.23±0.54)%, which were significantly better than the control group by (4.86±2.14)cm, (100.47±12.16)times/min, and (9.98±1.22)s, (82.32±3.02)%(t=2.349, 4.838, 20.128, 43.469), respectively. The hyperventilation rate of (1.42±1.33)% were significantly lower than the control group of(7.93±6.79)%(t=9.708) and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The real-time feedback system of cardiopulmonary resuscitation has remarkable application effect in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and can significantly improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation., 百拇医药(冯锡烜 刘书雁 卢丽锋 廖家宝 曹文伟)
1 2 3下一页