两种窝沟封闭剂预防儿童龋病的效果观察(1)
[摘要]目的 对比观察SDI Coseal与Eco-S窝沟封闭剂预防儿童恒磨牙龋病的临床效果。方法 将2014年1月~2015年12月在本科行窝沟封闭的200例7~9岁儿童的463颗恒牙随机分为两组,对照组选用Eco-s封闭剂,实验组采用SDI Conseal封闭剂。随访6个月~2年,观察两组封闭剂保留和患龋情况。结果 术后6个月实验组和对照组窝沟封闭剂保留率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1、2年实验组封闭剂保留率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、2年,实验组患龋率均低于对照组(1.3% vs 2.6%,3.0% vs 4.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 SDI Conseal固化后封闭性较佳,优于Eco-s窝沟封闭剂。
[关键词]SDI Coseal窝沟封闭剂;Eco-s窝沟封闭剂;龋病;窝沟封闭;预防
[中图分类号] R788+.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)10(a)-0126-03
[Abstract]Objective To compare the preventive effect of SDI Conseal and Eco-s pit and fissure sealant for caries in children.Methods 200 children (463 permanent teeth) aged 7 to 9 in the department from January 2014 to December 2015 were selected to perform sealant technique on their first molars and randomly divided into two groups ......
您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 3524 字符。
[关键词]SDI Coseal窝沟封闭剂;Eco-s窝沟封闭剂;龋病;窝沟封闭;预防
[中图分类号] R788+.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)10(a)-0126-03
[Abstract]Objective To compare the preventive effect of SDI Conseal and Eco-s pit and fissure sealant for caries in children.Methods 200 children (463 permanent teeth) aged 7 to 9 in the department from January 2014 to December 2015 were selected to perform sealant technique on their first molars and randomly divided into two groups ......
您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 3524 字符。