当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国当代医药》 > 2019年第24期
编号:13411986
跗骨窦入路与外侧L形切口入路治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的效果比较(4)
http://www.100md.com 2019年8月25日 《中国当代医药》 2019年第24期
     [14]袁曉伟.经跗骨窦入路治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨关节内骨折的疗效分析[D].延边:延边大学,2016:1-42.

    [15]Weinraub GM,Marissa S.Sinus tarsi approach with subcutaneously delivered plate fixation for displaced intra-srticular calcaneal fractures[J].Clin Podiatr Med Surg,2019,36(2):225-231.

    [16]张弢.微创治疗跟骨骨折的影像学及临床对比研究[D].石家庄:河北医科大学,2014:1-112.

    [17]Brand A,Klopfer-Kramer I,Bottger M,et al.Gait characteristics and functional outcomes during early follow-up are comparable in patients with calcaneal fractures treated by either the sinus tarsi or the extended lateral approach[J].Gait Posture,2019,70:190-195.

    [18]Zhou HC,Yu T,Ren HY,et al.Clinical comparison of extensile lateral approach and sinus tarsi approach combined with medial distraction technique for intra-articular calcaneal fractures[J].Orthop Surg,2017,9(1):77-85.

    [19]Nosewicz Tomasz L,Dingemans Siem A,Backes Manouk Luitse Jan SK,et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of the sinus tarsi and extended lateral approach in the operative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures[J].Foot Ankle Surg,2018,24(4):542-548.

    (收稿日期:2019-07-16 本文编辑:祁海文), http://www.100md.com(祝捷)
上一页1 2 3 4