微波妇科治疗仪与波姆光治疗仪用于宫颈糜烂治疗临床疗效对比(1)
【摘要】 目的：探讨微波妇科治疗仪与波姆光治疗仪治疗宫颈糜烂的临床疗效。方法：选取2013年
7月-2014年7月来本院就诊的宫颈糜烂患者150例，随机分为观察组及对照组，每组各75例，比较两组的临床疗效及并发症发生率。结果：两组不同程度的宫颈糜烂总有效率比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；观察组临床分度中轻、中、重度的痊愈率明显高于对照组，两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组不同类型的宫颈糜烂治疗总有效率比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；观察组不同类型的宫颈糜烂中痊愈率明显高于对照组，两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为2.67%，与对照组的12.00%比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：两种物理疗法均为治疗宫颈糜烂的理想手段，微波治疗仪的治疗效果及并发症情况优于波姆光治疗仪，可以根据患者情况选择治疗方法。
【关键词】 微波妇科治疗仪； 波姆光治疗仪； 宫颈糜烂； 临床疗效
, 百拇医药
Clinical Curative Effect Comparison of Microwave Instrument and Pome Treatment Gynecological Treatment Instrument for Cervical Erosion Treatment/LI Fei.//Medical Innovation of China，2015，12(34)：041-043
【Abstract】 Objective：To explore the clinical curative effect comparison of microwave instrument and pome treatment gynecological treatment instrument for cervical erosion treatment.Method：150 cervical erosion patients in our hospital were selected from July 2013 to July 2014，they were randomly divided into the observation group and control group， 75 cases in each group. The clinical effects and the incidence rate of complications of two groups were compared and observed.Result： Compared the total efficiency of cervical erosion in different degree of two groups， the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05)；the cure rate of clinical stages with severe，middle and light of observation group was significantly higher than those of the control group，the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared the total efficiency of cervical erosion treatment with different types of two groups， the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05)； the cure rate of cervical erosion in different types of observation group was higher than the control group， the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The complication rate of observation group was 2.67%， compared with 12.00% of the control group， the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion：Two kinds of physical therapy are the ideal means for the treatment of cervical erosion，the effect and complications of microwave therapeutic instrument are better than the clinical pome treatment，it can choose the treatment method according to the patients' condition.
, 百拇医药
【Key words】 Microwave therapeutic apparatus； Pome treatment instrument； Cervical erosion； Clinical curative effect
First-author’s address：People’s Hospital of Ganxian，Ganxian 341100，China
doi：10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2015.34.013
宫颈糜烂是指宫颈外口处的宫颈阴道部分局部表面的鳞状上皮组织，因炎症而丧失，很快为颈管的柱状上皮覆盖，使这些病变部位的组织外观呈颗粒状的红色区。随着现在人们生活环境和习惯的改变，宫颈糜烂在妇女中的发生率呈上升趋势[1-2]。宫颈糜烂是育龄期妇女常见疾病，宫颈糜烂的发生多与分娩、流产、产褥期感染或不洁夫妻生活损伤子宫颈有关[3]。本研究探讨微波妇科治疗仪与波姆光治疗仪用于宫颈糜烂治疗临床疗效对比，现报道如下。, http://www.100md.com(李斐)
7月-2014年7月来本院就诊的宫颈糜烂患者150例，随机分为观察组及对照组，每组各75例，比较两组的临床疗效及并发症发生率。结果：两组不同程度的宫颈糜烂总有效率比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；观察组临床分度中轻、中、重度的痊愈率明显高于对照组，两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组不同类型的宫颈糜烂治疗总有效率比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；观察组不同类型的宫颈糜烂中痊愈率明显高于对照组，两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为2.67%，与对照组的12.00%比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：两种物理疗法均为治疗宫颈糜烂的理想手段，微波治疗仪的治疗效果及并发症情况优于波姆光治疗仪，可以根据患者情况选择治疗方法。
【关键词】 微波妇科治疗仪； 波姆光治疗仪； 宫颈糜烂； 临床疗效
, 百拇医药
Clinical Curative Effect Comparison of Microwave Instrument and Pome Treatment Gynecological Treatment Instrument for Cervical Erosion Treatment/LI Fei.//Medical Innovation of China，2015，12(34)：041-043
【Abstract】 Objective：To explore the clinical curative effect comparison of microwave instrument and pome treatment gynecological treatment instrument for cervical erosion treatment.Method：150 cervical erosion patients in our hospital were selected from July 2013 to July 2014，they were randomly divided into the observation group and control group， 75 cases in each group. The clinical effects and the incidence rate of complications of two groups were compared and observed.Result： Compared the total efficiency of cervical erosion in different degree of two groups， the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05)；the cure rate of clinical stages with severe，middle and light of observation group was significantly higher than those of the control group，the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared the total efficiency of cervical erosion treatment with different types of two groups， the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05)； the cure rate of cervical erosion in different types of observation group was higher than the control group， the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The complication rate of observation group was 2.67%， compared with 12.00% of the control group， the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion：Two kinds of physical therapy are the ideal means for the treatment of cervical erosion，the effect and complications of microwave therapeutic instrument are better than the clinical pome treatment，it can choose the treatment method according to the patients' condition.
, 百拇医药
【Key words】 Microwave therapeutic apparatus； Pome treatment instrument； Cervical erosion； Clinical curative effect
First-author’s address：People’s Hospital of Ganxian，Ganxian 341100，China
doi：10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2015.34.013
宫颈糜烂是指宫颈外口处的宫颈阴道部分局部表面的鳞状上皮组织，因炎症而丧失，很快为颈管的柱状上皮覆盖，使这些病变部位的组织外观呈颗粒状的红色区。随着现在人们生活环境和习惯的改变，宫颈糜烂在妇女中的发生率呈上升趋势[1-2]。宫颈糜烂是育龄期妇女常见疾病，宫颈糜烂的发生多与分娩、流产、产褥期感染或不洁夫妻生活损伤子宫颈有关[3]。本研究探讨微波妇科治疗仪与波姆光治疗仪用于宫颈糜烂治疗临床疗效对比，现报道如下。, http://www.100md.com(李斐)