体外冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术在上尿路结石中的应用
上尿路结石Comparison,of,ureteroscope,pneumatic
 |
| 第1页 |
参见附件。
【摘要】目的比较体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术(URSL)治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效。方法选择上尿路结石患者120例，随机分为ESWL组60例，URSL组60例，比较两组的临床疗效及并发症情况。结果URSL组结石一次性清除率、有效率显著高于ESWL组，再次手术率显著低于ESWL组，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。URSL组肾绞痛、恶心呕吐、发热发生率显著低于ESWL组，血尿发生率显著高于ESWL组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05)。结论UREL治疗上尿路结石疗效可靠，并发症少，是临床治疗首选手段。
【关键词】体外冲击波碎石；输尿管镜气压弹道碎石；上尿路结石Comparison of ureteroscope pneumatic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi YANG Dong-ming,WANG Xiao-yong,LAI Jian-xin,ZHAN Shang-xin.Huizhou City of Chinese Medicine Hospital,Huizhou 516001,China
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical effect of URSL and ESWL in upper urinary tract calculi.Methods120 patients with upper urinary tract calculi were randomly divided into two groups:ESWL group (60 cases) and URSL group (60 cases),compared the clinical effect and complications.ResultsThe one-time stone clearance rate of the URSL group was significantly higher than the ESWL group (P<0.05)，and its reoperation rate was significantly lower than the ESWL group (P<0.05).The incidence of renal colic，nausea，vomiting and fever in the URSL group was signifieantly lower than the ESWL group,and the occurrence rate of hematuria in the former was higher than that in the ESWL group (P<0 ......
您现在查看是摘要介绍页，详见PDF附件。