不同尿沉渣分析仪与显微镜检查的比较和分析
范冉 王文静 马捷 房忠军 闫旭![](/images/paper/2095-0616/202123/36-1-l.jpg)
![](/images/paper/2095-0616/202123/36-2-l.jpg)
![](/images/paper/2095-0616/202123/36-3-l.jpg)
[摘要]目的比较 SYSMEX UF-1000i 与 SYSMEX UF-5000两种尿沉渣分析仪在白细胞(WBC)、红细胞(RBC)、管型(CAST)检测上的灵敏度、特异性以及与显微镜检查的一致性。方法随机收集2021年2—5月首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院病房及门诊患者1048份尿液标本。分别使用 SYSMEX UF-1000i、SYSMEX UF-5000以及显微镜进行检测,超过参考范围为阳性,否则为阴性,记录结果并进行比较分析。结果 SYSMEX UF-1000i 检测、SYSMEX UF-5000检测、镜检尿液 WBC 陽性率分别为20.04%、19.47%、17.56%; RBC 阳性率分别为17.37%、14.98%、11.83%; CAST 阳性率分别为35.31%、7.44%、6.77%。 SYSMEX UF-1000i、SYSMEX UF-5000检测相比较, WBC、RBC 结果差异无统计学意义( P >0.05),CAST 结果差异有统计学意义( P 0.05),RBC、CAST 结果差异有统计学意义( P 0.05),RBC 结果差异有统计学意义(P 0.05) , but there was significant difference in the results of CAST (P 0.05), but there were significant differences in the results of RBC and CAST (P 0.05) , and there was significant difference in urine RBC (P <0.05). Compared with SYSMEX UF-1000i, the test results of SYSMEX UF-5000 and the results of microscopy had better consistency. Conclusion SYSMEX UF-5000 has better detection performance than SYSMEX UF-1000i ......
您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 10554 字符。