髋臼后壁骨折三种内固定方式的生物力学研究及临床意义
骨板,拉力,1材料与方法,2结果,3讨论
李飞 李力更吴啸波 梁卫东 洪建仁(唐山市第二医院创伤骨科,河北唐山 063000)
髋臼后壁骨折三种内固定方式的生物力学研究及临床意义
李飞 李力更*吴啸波 梁卫东 洪建仁
(唐山市第二医院创伤骨科,河北唐山 063000)
背景:锁定重建接骨板已应用于髋臼后壁骨折的治疗,但关于其固定髋臼后壁骨折生物力学稳定性的研究报道甚少。
目的:比较锁定重建接骨板、重建接骨板及单纯拉力螺钉固定髋臼后壁骨折的生物力学稳定性。
方法:取成人新鲜半骨盆标本18个,制成髋臼后壁骨折模型,随机分成三组。A组用2枚拉力螺钉固定,B组用重建接骨板固定,C组用锁定重建接骨板固定。进行轴向加载实验,测定各组骨折的纵向位移、内固定失效时的载荷及轴向刚度,以比较各内固定方式的稳定性。
结果:在相同载荷下,B组、C组骨折的纵向位移小于A组,B组、C组内固定失效时的载荷及轴向刚度大于A组,有统计学差异(P<0.05);B 组与 C 组在纵向位移、内固定失效时的载荷及轴向刚度之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
结论:锁定重建接骨板与重建接骨板的内固定稳定性优于单纯拉力螺钉内固定,锁定重建接骨板与重建接骨板内的固定稳定性相似,均可用于髋臼后壁骨折的内固定治疗。
髋臼;后壁;骨折;内固定;生物力学
Background:Locking reconstruction plates have been used to treat acetabular posterior wall fractures.But there are few reports on the biomechanic stability of acetabular posterior wall fractures fixed with locking reconstruction plate.
Objective:To compare the biomechanic stability of acetabular posterior wall fractures fixed with locking reconstruction plate,reconstruction plate or lag screw.
Methods:Acetabular posterior wall fractures were induced in 18 adult fresh semipelvis specimens,and then divided into three groups randomly.The fractures were fixed with two lag screws in group A,with reconstruction plate in group B,and with locking reconstruction plate in group C.The longitudinal displacements,loading of failed internal fixation and axial stiffness were measured by axial loading experiments and compared between groups. ......
您现在查看是摘要页,全文长 16743 字符。