《美国精神病学与法律学报》.2006年.第4期

......

• A Pilot Rasch Scaling of Lawyers' Perceptions of Expert Bias
• Lawyers' Attitudes Toward Involuntary Treatment
• Competency for Creation, Use, and Revocation of Psychiatric Advance Directives
• Shared Psychotic Disorder and Criminal Responsibility: A Review and Case Report of Folie à Trois
• Attorneys' Requests for Complete Tax Records from Opposing Expert Witnesses: Some Approaches to the Problem
• Assessing and Managing the Risks in the Stalking Situation
• Commentary: The Importance of Professional Judgment in Evaluation of Stalking and Threatening Situations
• Commentary: Stalking Risk Profile
• Competency to Stand Trial and the Seriousness of the Charge
• Commentary: UK Perspective on Competency to Stand Trial
• Lies And Coercion: Why Psychiatrists Should Not Participate in Police and Intelligence Interrogations
• Commentary: It’s About the Fundamentals
• Back to the Past in California: A Temporary Retreat to a Tarasoff Duty to Warn
• Fratricide: A Forensic Psychiatric Perspective
• Civil Commitment Is Disappearing in Oregon
• Update on the Disposition of Military Insanity Acquittees
• Clark v. Arizona: Diminishing the Right of Mentally Ill Individuals to a Full and Fair Defense