Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection of Human Lung Endothelial Cells Enhances Selectively Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression
http://www.100md.com
免疫学杂志 2005年第11期
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is worldwide the most frequent cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in infants requiring hospitalization. In the present study, we supply evidence that human lung microvascular endothelial cells, human pulmonary lung aorta endothelial cells, and HUVEC are target cells for productive RSV infection. All three RSV-infected endothelial cell types showed an enhanced cell surface expression of ICAM-1 (CD54), which increased in a time- and RSV-dose-dependent manner. By using noninfectious RSV particles we verified that replication of RSV is a prerequisite for the increase of ICAM-1 cell surface expression. The up-regulated ICAM-1 expression pattern correlated with an increased cellular ICAM-1 mRNA amount. In contrast to ICAM-1, a de novo expression of VCAM-1 (CD106) was only observed on RSV-infected HUVEC. Neither P-selectin (CD62P) nor E-selectin (CD62E) was up-regulated by RSV on human endothelial cells. Additional experiments performed with neutralizing Abs specific for IL-1, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-, respectively, excluded an autocrine mechanism responsible for the observed ICAM-1 up-regulation. The virus-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation was dependent on protein kinase C and A, PI3K, and p38 MAPK activity. Adhesion experiments using polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMN) verified an increased ICAM-1-dependent adhesion rate of PMN cocultured with RSV-infected endothelial cells. Furthermore, the increased adhesiveness resulted in an enhanced transmigration rate of PMN. Our in vitro data suggest that human lung endothelial cells are target cells for RSV infection and that ICAM-1 up-regulated on RSV-infected endothelial cells might contribute to the enhanced accumulation of PMN into the bronchoalveolar space.
Introduction
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)2 is the major cause of serious lower respiratory disease in infancy and early childhood (1). By the age of 2 years >90% of children have been infected with RSV, and due to incomplete immunity, adults get reinfected throughout their life (2, 3). The epithelial cells of the respiratory mucosa are the primary target cells for RSV and evidence accumulated that they play an active role in the course of an ongoing RSV infection (4). Especially by the release of chemokines (5, 6, 7) and the expression of adhesion molecules, i.e., ICAM-1 (8, 9, 10), the lung epithelial cells contribute to the early acute inflammatory response evolving immediately postinfection. Obviously, the result of inflammation is dependent on viral and host cell factors. In this regard, we demonstrated the prominent role of the viral soluble G protein in modulating inflammatory responses of the host cell (11). Along the established chemotaxin gradient inflammatory effector cells are then chemotactically recruited from the local blood vessels via the mucosal tissue into the lumen of the alveolar space. Autopsy studies of infants who died following bronchiolitis revealed an intense peribronchial infiltration of mononuclear cells and cell debris in the airway lumen (12). Furthermore, a neutrophil-rich exudate detected by bronchoalveolar lavage has been described (13). These polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMN) adhere to the RSV-infected epithelial cells and become activated thereby (14, 15). As a consequence, they release reactive oxygen radicals and hydrolytic enzymes and, therefore, are responsible primarily for the subsequent intense inflammation of the lung (16, 17). The smaller airways then become plugged with cell debris and mucin.
Despite these basic insights into the mechanisms of an ongoing RSV infection, many aspects remain poorly understood. It is actually unknown whether human lung endothelial cells, which are intimately connected with the lung epithelium within the bronchoalveolar lumen, are also targets for RSV infection. It was reported by Haeberle et al. (18) that lung endothelial cells from RSV-infected mice expressed MIP-1. However, whether this chemokine expression was directly induced by RSV infection or by means of a paracrine mechanism is still not known. The infection of HUVEC is still contradictorily discussed. Friedmann et al. (19) reported that RSV was not able to infect HUVEC or bovine thoracic aorta endothelium. In contrast, Visseren et al. (20) observed that RSV infection of HUVEC can occur and that infection increases their procoagulant activity. Because the activation of endothelial cells is one key process promoting the initiation of inflammatory reactions, which involve rolling, adhesion, and transmigration of leukocytes to the sites of inflammatory challenge, we asked whether human lung endothelial cells become infected with RSV and whether expression of adhesion molecules (CD62P, CD62E, CD54, CD106) might be directly modulated by RSV. Because evidence emerged that different endothelial cell types might show functional differences (21, 22), we analyzed HUVEC as a useful model because of their availability and reproduction, as well as human pulmonary lung aorta endothelial cells (HPAEC) and human lung microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC-L) in our study. Our data demonstrate that all three endothelial cell types (HUVEC, HPAEC, and HMVEC-L) are permissive for a productive RSV infection and that they respond with an increased ICAM-1 cell surface expression subsequent to RSV infection. Consequently, cocultured PMN showed an increased adhesion as well as transmigration rate. These in vitro data suggest that human lung endothelial cells are productive target cells for RSV infection and that the prominent accumulation of inflammatory effector cells into the bronchioli of the RSV-infected lung is not only due to the chemotaxins released by the infected epithelial cells but also due to the direct up-regulation of ICAM-1 on RSV-infected lung endothelial cells. Thus, infection of lung endothelial cells by RSV may result in the activation of lung endothelia and in the augmentation of inflammatory processes.
Materials and Methods
Statistics
If not stated otherwise, the results obtained by flow cytometry studies are presented as means and SEM (MFI ± SEM) or percentage of cells ± SEM. The significance was evaluated by two-sided Student’s t test.
Results
RSV infection of human endothelial cells
To analyze whether human endothelial cells are targets for RSV infection, we infected HUVEC, HMVEC-L, and HPAEC with RSV. The replication of RSV was determined by analyzing the expression of the virus F protein on the cell surface of infected endothelial cells by FACS analysis. As shown in Fig. 1A1, HUVEC expressed the viral F protein after 24 h postinfection on their cell surfaces. Only the addition of infectious virus particles led to the expression of cell surface F protein. In contrast, virus particles inactivated by UV irradiation were not able to induce any F protein expression (Fig. 1, A1 and B). Therefore, virus replication was a prerequisite for the expression of F protein on HUVEC cells. Similar results were obtained with an Ab specific for the G protein (data not shown). When an isotype-matched control Ab was used in place of the mAb specific for the F protein, cells that had been infected with RSV did not stain positive. Similar fluorescence histograms were obtained with noninfected cells stained with anti-F protein mAb (Fig. 1A1, dashed line). The maximal expression of F protein was determined on HUVEC 24 h subsequent to infection. Additional infection studies performed with HUVEC verified that the expression of F protein increased in a time- and RSV-dose-dependent manner during the first 24 h postinfection (Fig. 1B). When we analyzed the F-protein expression on RSV-infected HPAEC, we observed a similar expression pattern (data not shown). In contrast, HMVEC-L infected with RSV did not stain positive for F protein during the first 24 h following infection. However, thereafter, the expression of F protein increased steadily and reached its maximum after 72 h postinfection (Fig. 1A2). Beyond an incubation time of 72 h, all infected endothelial cell cultures showed increasing cytopathic effects and cell death occurred. During our performed experiments we observed no apoptotic cell processes determined by microscopic analysis instead of necrotic cell death in RSV-infected endothelial cell cultures. To determine whether the infection of endothelial cells resulted in the release of new infectious progeny virus, the cell supernatants were titrated. As depicted in Fig. 1C, all three endothelial cell types produced new progeny virus. Especially the infection of HMVEC-L led to a prominent release of new infectious RSV particles. For control, when supernatants were titrated as early as 12 h postinfection, no infectious particles were found. Therefore, the primary addition of RSV does not account for the progeny virus determined after 48 h.
As early as 24 h postinfection, an increased ICAM-1 expression was observed on HUVEC and HPAEC. This expression of ICAM-1 increased steadily with prolonged incubation time up to 72 h (Fig. 2, A and B). Thereafter, expression declined due to increasing cytotoxicity (data not shown). Similar to the delayed F protein expression observed on RSV-infected HMVEC-L, we obtained no significant up-regulation of ICAM-1 on these cells during the first 24 h postinfection (Fig. 2C). Thereafter, the increasing F protein expression paralleled the RSV-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 on HMVEC-L up to 96 h postinfection. Subsequently, cell cytotoxicity increased and ICAM-1 expression declined (data not shown). When RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression was directly compared between the different endothelial cell types, HUVEC expressed the most increased ICAM-1 cell surface expression (Fig. 2A).
The addition of nonreplicative UV-inactivated RSV did not induce ICAM-1 expression beyond the constitutive expression level (data not shown) suggesting that productive infection of all three endothelial cell types under investigation was a prerequisite for the observed RSV-dependent ICAM-1 up-regulation.
In contrast to ICAM-1, we observed that the expression of selectins (CD62P, CD62E) was not inducible by RSV neither on HUVEC nor on HMVEC-L and HPAEC, respectively (data not shown).
Enhanced VCAM-1 expression only on RSV-infected HUVEC
Recently, the enhanced expression of VCAM-1 on RSV-infected A549 cells was reported (29). When we analyzed endothelial cells for VCAM-1 expression they did not stain constitutively positive for VCAM-1. Subsequent to RSV infection, only HUVEC up-regulated VCAM-1 on their cell surface 24 h after their infection. This expression increased with prolonged incubation time up to 72 h (Fig. 3A). The maximal percentage of VCAM-1-positive cells was observed after 72 h postinfection (Fig. 3, A and B). Although a m.o.i. of 5 was used throughout these infection studies, HUVEC stained only positive for VCAM-1 in the range of 30%. Similar to ICAM-1 expression, the addition of noninfectious virus (m.o.i. = 5, inactivated by UV-irradiation) did not induce VCAM-1 expression on HUVEC (data not shown). To verify that the HUVEC under study were still able to up-regulate VCAM-1 in a TNF--dependent manner, peaking at 4–6 h, we determined VCAM-1 in our in vitro cell culture system on HUVEC activated with TNF-. As shown in Fig. 3C, HUVEC showed a significant VCAM-1 expression after 6 h following TNF- stimulation.
Cellular ICAM-1 mRNA amount is increased in RSV-infected endothelial cells
To study the RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression in more detail, we performed RT-PCR experiments. In HPAEC, transcripts for ICAM-1 were detectable only at low levels in noninfected cells (Fig. 4, lane 1) but RSV infection induced enhanced message levels in a dose-dependent manner (compare lane 1 with lanes 2–6). When compared with noninfected cells (lane 1), the amount of cellular ICAM-1 mRNA was most prominent in cells infected with RSV at a m.o.i. of 5 (lane 6). Exposure of HPAEC to nonreplicative virus (RSV-UV) did not increase the amount of ICAM-1 mRNA when compared with noninfected cells (lane 1 and 7). To verify inherent PCR specificity, a positive control, supplied by the manufacturer, was amplified in parallel and resulted in a visible band of 320 bp in size (lane 8). Similar results showing an enhanced amount of cellular ICAM-1 mRNA were obtained when HUVEC and HMVEC-L were infected with RSV (data not shown).
RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 is not mediated by an autocrine mechanism
It is well known that ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 are markedly up-regulated on endothelial cells by the proinflammatory cytokines TNF- and IL-1, respectively (30, 31), and that HUVEC and microvascular endothelial cells are able to secrete a variety of cytokines (32). Therefore, we hypothesized that RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 is partly mediated by an autocrine mechanism as it was reported for A549 epithelial cells (33). However, we observed no cytokine (IL-1, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-)-mediated up-regulation of ICAM-1 on HUVEC and HPAEC. In addition, VCAM-1 expression on HUVEC 24 h postinfection was also not mediated by an autocrine mechanism (data not shown).
RSV induces ICAM-1 expression in a PI3K-, PKA and PKC-, and p38 MAPK-dependent manner
We next used pharmacological inhibitors to investigate whether RSV-dependent ICAM-1 expression on HUVEC might be mediated through the activity of one or more intracellular signaling pathways. Recently, evidence accumulated that activation of the PI3K (34), the ERK1/ERK2 (35), and the PKC (36) occur in RSV-infected human epithelial cells. Therefore, we asked whether the activity of intermediate kinases might be a prerequisite for the RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 on HUVEC. We analyzed HUVEC because ICAM-1 was most markedly up-regulated on these cells. Cell monolayers were pretreated with these inhibitors for 30 min, infected with RSV and then incubated in the presence of these pharmacological substances for further 48 h. As can be seen from Fig. 5, the exposure of HUVEC with the PI3K inhibitor Ly294002 inhibited nearly completely the RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation. Furthermore, inhibition of the PKC by means of the myristoylated EGF-R inhibitor peptide as well as inhibition of PKA activity by KT5720, respectively, inhibited significantly the RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation. In contrast, inhibition of the protein kinase G through the specific inhibitor RP-8-Br-cGMP did not modulate ICAM-1 expression. With regard to MAPK signaling pathways, we determined the effect of the MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059, the JNK peptide inhibitor 1 (L-JNKI-1), and the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 on RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression. As shown, only the inhibition of the p38 MAPK cascade through SB203580 diminished the cell surface ICAM-1 expression on RSV-infected HUVEC in a significant manner. The involvement of p38 kinase activity was further substantiated by analyzing a second specific p38 kinase inhibitor, i.e., 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-pyridin-4-yl-1,2-dihydropyrazol-3-one used at a concentration of 1 μM. Similar data were obtained (data not shown).
RSV infection of endothelial cells induces adhesion of PMN and U937 cells
A leukocyte adhesion assay was performed to investigate whether the RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression on HUVEC, HMVEC-L and HPAEC might be responsible for an increased adhesion of immune effector cells. For this purpose, RSV-infected endothelial cell monolayers were cocultured with PMA-activated U937 cells, a promyelocytic cell line, and PMN, respectively. Infection of all three endothelial cell types with RSV induced at least a 2-fold increase in the adhesion of U937 cells and PMN (Fig. 6A). Furthermore, with regard to HMVEC-L the adhesion of U937 cells increased 3-fold compared with noninfected cells, and PMN were 5-fold more adherent to RSV-infected HUVEC when compared with noninfected cells. To analyze whether the observed increased ICAM-1 cell surface expression might be responsible for the increased adhesion rate of PMN to RSV-infected HUVEC, we cocultured PMN in the presence of blocking mAb specific for ICAM-1, VCAM-1, or isotype IgG1 Ab. As shown in Fig. 6B, preincubation of the monolayers with specific blocking ICAM-1 mAb diminished the adhesion rate of PMN from 5- to 2-fold compared with noninfected cells. In contrast, with regard to the adhesion of PMN blocking of VCAM-1 or addition of isotype control IgG1 Ab was without any influence. Therefore, ICAM-1 up-regulated on RSV-infected endothelial cells showed functional integrity.
RSV infection of endothelial cells results in higher transmigration rates of PMN
To determine whether the increased adhesion of PMN to RSV-infected endothelial cells might result in an increased transmigration rate, confluent endothelial cell monolayers, grown on polycarbonate filters, were cocultured with purified PMN. The PMN were allowed to settle and migrate for 3 h across noninfected and RSV-infected intact endothelial cell monolayers. To provide a chemotactic gradient for the cocultured PMN, the medium of the lower well compartment contained the chemotaxin IL-8 at a concentration of 10 ng/ml. This in vitro transmigration model should mimic the IL-8 chemotaxin gradient established by the RSV-infected lung epithelial cell in the course of an ongoing RSV infection. As depicted in Fig. 7, migration of PMN across RSV-infected monolayers, regardless of the endothelial type used, was significantly enhanced when compared with noninfected monolayers. The transmigration rate increased always in a RSV-dose-dependent manner. However, the RSV-induced transmigration rate differed with respect to the endothelial cell type used; the order of potency was: HUVEC > HMVEC-L > HPAEC.
Discussion
Following RSV infection, an increased number of immune effector cells accumulate in the lung tissue and airway lumen (12). Everard et al. (13) reported that PMN accounted for 93 and 76% of the cells recovered by BAL from central and peripheral airways of infants suffering from RSV bronchiolitis. However, detailed knowledge elucidating the RSV-induced recruitment of immune effector cells as well as development of the inflammatory response is failing.
In the case of RSV infection of the lower respiratory tract, the microvascular endothelial cells of the pulmonary capillaries are in intimate contact with the RSV-infected lung epithelial cells. Our data presented in this study report for the first time that primary lung endothelial cells (HMVEC-L, HPAEC) and HUVEC are target cells for RSV infection. The cells expressed viral F protein on their cell surface and shed infectious progeny virus into the cell supernatant. These results are in agreement with data recently published by Visseren at al. (20) showing that HUVEC are permissive for RSV infection and respond thereafter with an increased procoagulant activity.
Our data show that subsequent to RSV infection all three endothelial cell types up-regulated their ICAM-1 expression in a time- and virus-load-dependent manner. Similar to A549 cells replication of RSV was always a prerequisite for ICAM-1 up-regulation on all three endothelial cell types (data not shown for HMVEC-L and HPAEC).
It has been shown by Chini et al. (37) that the enhanced expression of ICAM-1 on RSV-infected lung epithelial cells was dependent on novel mRNA synthesis. They supplied evidence that the NF-B and C/EBP binding sequences located in the ICAM-1 promoter are required for RSV-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1. Similar to RSV-infected lung epithelial cells we observed an increased amount of cellular ICAM-1 mRNA in endothelial cells infected with RSV suggesting that the enhanced cell surface expression of ICAM-1 is primarily mediated via an increased gene transcription activity and de novo protein synthesis. In this regard, when RSV-infected endothelial cells were cultured in the presence of actinomycin D (5 μg/ml), aspirin (1 mM), or cycloheximide (10 μg/ml) the RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation was substantially inhibited (data not shown).
The release of IL-1 from RSV-infected A549 lung epithelial cells is well recognized for its pivotal role in mediating ICAM-1 expression in an autocrine manner (33) as well as for its paracrine ICAM-1 inducing effect on HUVEC (38). Our data presented in this study indicate that neither IL-1, IL-1, IL-6, nor TNF-, possibly secreted from infected endothelial cells, are responsible for the up-regulation of ICAM-1 on RSV-infected HUVEC and HPAEC, respectively.
Beside the RSV-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 we observed no up-regulation of selectins and VCAM-1 on RSV-infected human HMVEC-L and HPAEC up to 24 h postinfection. Only, RSV-infected HUVEC expressed VCAM-1 on their cell surface 24 h postinfection, but similar to primary lung endothelial cells no up-regulation of selectins was observed. In contrast to the postcapillary venules of the systemic circulation, where PMN emigration normally occurs, the pulmonary capillaries are the primary site of emigration in the pulmonary circulation and rolling does not occur (39). Due to the size of the vascular diameter, the PMN are trapped within the capillaries. Therefore, an increased expression of selectins seems not to be a prerequisite for the extravasation of PMN out of the pulmonary capillaries. Trapped PMN, additionally activated via soluble proinflammatory mediators, i.e., chemotaxins, as well as cell-cell interactions, become enlarged and more rigid, thereby increasing their retention in the lung capillaries.
All leukocytes use the 2-integrin/ICAM-1 interaction for adhesion and transmigration. In this study we observed an increased adhesion of PMN and monocytic cells (PMA-activated U937 cells) to RSV-infected endothelial cells. For PMN, we verified that this increased adhesion was dependent on the increased cell surface amount of ICAM-1. We hypothesize that leukocytes migrating out of the bloodstream into the pulmonary circulation of the RSV-infected lung become additionally activated by soluble inflammatory mediators in a paracrine fashion, i.e., via IL-6, IL-8, and RANTES released from RSV-infected endothelial cells (our unpublished observations) or IL-8 and IL-1 released from RSV-infected epithelial cells (5, 33).
The increased binding rate of PMN to all three RSV-infected endothelial cell types under investigation resulted in an enhanced in vitro transmigration rate. Because PMN adhere and transmigrate always in a VCAM-1-independent manner, our finding that VCAM-1 was not up-regulated on RSV-infected lung endothelial cells should be without influence concerning the emigration rate of PMN. However, whether the RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation mediating the increased adhesion of PMN to lung endothelial cells might be automatically involved in the transmigration process is still not known. Evidence accumulated that beside the well-known 2-integrin-dependent transmigration process, a 2-integrin-independent migration mechanism of PMN does exist in the lung (40, 41). Within the lung, this pathway is restricted to the lung capillaries. Recent data suggest that Gram-negative organisms induce a CD11/CD18-dependent PMN emigration out of the lung capillaries, whereas Gram-positive organisms elicit a CD11/CD18-independent emigration (42). However, in light of new published data this distinction obviously oversimplifies this multiform process. Which of these both transmigration mechanisms are actually operative is also in part dependent on the chronicity of reactions as well as on the various chemotaxins (43, 44). Thus, a CD18-independent transendothelial migration of PMN can be stimulated in vitro by the host-derived chemoattractants IL-8 and leukotriene B4 (45). Because we used an IL-8 chemotaxin gradient in our in vitro transmigration model we suggest that cocultured PMN migrated in a CD18-independent way through the RSV-infected endothelial monolayer. In that case, the observed increased transmigration rate should be a direct consequence of the enhanced ICAM-1-mediated adhesion rate. However, future experiments have to address this point.
Concerning RSV infection there is currently no effective antiviral or anti-inflammatory treatment available. The analysis of the signal transduction pathways mediating the detrimental RSV-induced ICAM-1 cell surface expression may lead to the development of novel anti-inflammatory strategies. Therefore, we used pharmacological inhibitors to investigate which signaling pathways must be present in an active state to allow for RSV-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 on HUVEC. Our data show that inhibition of PI3K by means of LY294002 reduced the RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression in a significant manner. Quite recently, Thomas et al. (34) reported that the RSV-induced apoptosis is delayed by activation of the PI3/Akt survival pathway. In this study, the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 was used at a concentration of 50 μM. We used the PI3K inhibitor at a nearly 10-times lower concentration, i.e., 6.4 μM, and observed no inhibitor-dependent cytotoxicity in RSV-infected HUVEC. Whether these divergent results are due to the different cell types used or result from the different inhibitor concentrations is still not known. Nevertheless, our data clearly show that PI3K activity is a prerequisite for RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation. Furthermore, the inhibition of PKC- and PKA activity, before infection with RSV, diminished significantly the ICAM-1 up-regulation on HUVEC. Recently, studies performed by Monick et al. (36) showed that RSV activates multiple PKC isoforms in A549 lung epithelial cells, which subsequently leads to the activation of ERK. Three major types of MAPK cascades have been reported in mammalian cells, namely the ERK1/ERK2 cascade, the JNK/stress-activated protein kinase cascade, and the p38 kinase pathway. The activity of the MEK, ERK and p38 kinase in RSV-infected epithelial cells has been linked to RSV replication, IL-8 release, and posttranscriptional RANTES gene expression, respectively (35, 46, 47). Moreover, it was reported that expression of TNF- and IL-1 in RSV-infected epithelial cells required the activation of the p38 MAPK pathway (48). Our data supply evidence that only the p38 MAPK pathway must be in an active state to allow for RSV-dependent ICAM-1 up-regulation. In summary, different protein kinases, i.e., PI3K, PKC, PKA, and p38 kinase, respectively, control the RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 on HUVEC. Whether RSV-infected lung endothelial cells show an identical signal transduction pattern remains to be determined. Differences might exist as it was observed for HUVEC and primary endothelial cells (22) and rat pulmonary arterial vs rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (49). Nevertheless, in comparison to HMVEC-L and HPAEC the RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 was most prominent on HUVEC leading to the highest adhesion and transmigration rate of PMN. With regard to these data as well as their availability and reproduction, we suggest that HUVEC are a useful in vitro RSV infection model for analyzing the role of lung endothelial cells during an ongoing primary RSV infection. A comparison with primary lung endothelial cells, which has been done in our study will clarify the importance of novel results.
In summary, we conclude that pulmonary endothelial cells are target cells for productive RSV infection. Due to the up-regulation of ICAM-1 they might contribute to the detrimental accumulation of PMN into the RSV-infected lung. Therefore, similar to the RSV-infected lung epithelial cells they are intimately involved in the innate proinflammatory immune response.
Footnotes
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ralf Arnold, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Leipzigerstrasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. E-mail address: ralf.arnold{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; F protein, fusion protein; HMVEC-L, human lung microvascular endothelial cell; HPAEC, human pulmonary lung aorta endothelial cell; m.o.i., multiplicity of infection; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; EGF-R, epidermal growth-factor receptor; EGM-2, endothelial growth medium-2; PMN, polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocyte; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
Received for publication November 4, 2004. Accepted for publication March 7, 2005.
References
McIntosh, K.. 1997. Respiratory syncytial virus. S. A. Evans, and R. A. Kaslow, eds. Viral Infections of Humans: Epidemiology and Control 691-711 Plenum Publishing, New York. .
Hall, C. B., C. A. McCarthy. 2000. Respiratory syncytial virus. G. L. Mandell, and J. E. Benett, and R. Dolin, eds. Principles and Practise of Infectious Diseases 1782-1801 Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia. .
Falsey, A. R., E. E. Walsh. 2000. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 371-384.
Garofalo, R. P., H. Haeberle. 2000. Epithelial regulation of innate immunity to respiratory syncytial virus. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 23: 581-585.
Arnold, R., B. Humbert, H. Werchau, H. Gallati, W. K?nig. 1994. Interleukin-8, interleukin-6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type I release from a human pulmonary epithelial cell line (A549) exposed to respiratory syncytial virus. Immunology 82: 126-133
Olszewska-Pazdrak, B., A. Casola, T. Saito, R. Alam, S. E. Crowe, F. Mei, P. L. Ogra, R. P. Garofalo. 1998. Cell-specific expression of RANTES, MCP-1 and MIP-1 by lower airway epithelial cells and eosinophils infected with respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. 72: 4756-4764.(Ralf Arnold1 and Wolfgang)
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is worldwide the most frequent cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in infants requiring hospitalization. In the present study, we supply evidence that human lung microvascular endothelial cells, human pulmonary lung aorta endothelial cells, and HUVEC are target cells for productive RSV infection. All three RSV-infected endothelial cell types showed an enhanced cell surface expression of ICAM-1 (CD54), which increased in a time- and RSV-dose-dependent manner. By using noninfectious RSV particles we verified that replication of RSV is a prerequisite for the increase of ICAM-1 cell surface expression. The up-regulated ICAM-1 expression pattern correlated with an increased cellular ICAM-1 mRNA amount. In contrast to ICAM-1, a de novo expression of VCAM-1 (CD106) was only observed on RSV-infected HUVEC. Neither P-selectin (CD62P) nor E-selectin (CD62E) was up-regulated by RSV on human endothelial cells. Additional experiments performed with neutralizing Abs specific for IL-1, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-, respectively, excluded an autocrine mechanism responsible for the observed ICAM-1 up-regulation. The virus-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation was dependent on protein kinase C and A, PI3K, and p38 MAPK activity. Adhesion experiments using polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMN) verified an increased ICAM-1-dependent adhesion rate of PMN cocultured with RSV-infected endothelial cells. Furthermore, the increased adhesiveness resulted in an enhanced transmigration rate of PMN. Our in vitro data suggest that human lung endothelial cells are target cells for RSV infection and that ICAM-1 up-regulated on RSV-infected endothelial cells might contribute to the enhanced accumulation of PMN into the bronchoalveolar space.
Introduction
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)2 is the major cause of serious lower respiratory disease in infancy and early childhood (1). By the age of 2 years >90% of children have been infected with RSV, and due to incomplete immunity, adults get reinfected throughout their life (2, 3). The epithelial cells of the respiratory mucosa are the primary target cells for RSV and evidence accumulated that they play an active role in the course of an ongoing RSV infection (4). Especially by the release of chemokines (5, 6, 7) and the expression of adhesion molecules, i.e., ICAM-1 (8, 9, 10), the lung epithelial cells contribute to the early acute inflammatory response evolving immediately postinfection. Obviously, the result of inflammation is dependent on viral and host cell factors. In this regard, we demonstrated the prominent role of the viral soluble G protein in modulating inflammatory responses of the host cell (11). Along the established chemotaxin gradient inflammatory effector cells are then chemotactically recruited from the local blood vessels via the mucosal tissue into the lumen of the alveolar space. Autopsy studies of infants who died following bronchiolitis revealed an intense peribronchial infiltration of mononuclear cells and cell debris in the airway lumen (12). Furthermore, a neutrophil-rich exudate detected by bronchoalveolar lavage has been described (13). These polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMN) adhere to the RSV-infected epithelial cells and become activated thereby (14, 15). As a consequence, they release reactive oxygen radicals and hydrolytic enzymes and, therefore, are responsible primarily for the subsequent intense inflammation of the lung (16, 17). The smaller airways then become plugged with cell debris and mucin.
Despite these basic insights into the mechanisms of an ongoing RSV infection, many aspects remain poorly understood. It is actually unknown whether human lung endothelial cells, which are intimately connected with the lung epithelium within the bronchoalveolar lumen, are also targets for RSV infection. It was reported by Haeberle et al. (18) that lung endothelial cells from RSV-infected mice expressed MIP-1. However, whether this chemokine expression was directly induced by RSV infection or by means of a paracrine mechanism is still not known. The infection of HUVEC is still contradictorily discussed. Friedmann et al. (19) reported that RSV was not able to infect HUVEC or bovine thoracic aorta endothelium. In contrast, Visseren et al. (20) observed that RSV infection of HUVEC can occur and that infection increases their procoagulant activity. Because the activation of endothelial cells is one key process promoting the initiation of inflammatory reactions, which involve rolling, adhesion, and transmigration of leukocytes to the sites of inflammatory challenge, we asked whether human lung endothelial cells become infected with RSV and whether expression of adhesion molecules (CD62P, CD62E, CD54, CD106) might be directly modulated by RSV. Because evidence emerged that different endothelial cell types might show functional differences (21, 22), we analyzed HUVEC as a useful model because of their availability and reproduction, as well as human pulmonary lung aorta endothelial cells (HPAEC) and human lung microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC-L) in our study. Our data demonstrate that all three endothelial cell types (HUVEC, HPAEC, and HMVEC-L) are permissive for a productive RSV infection and that they respond with an increased ICAM-1 cell surface expression subsequent to RSV infection. Consequently, cocultured PMN showed an increased adhesion as well as transmigration rate. These in vitro data suggest that human lung endothelial cells are productive target cells for RSV infection and that the prominent accumulation of inflammatory effector cells into the bronchioli of the RSV-infected lung is not only due to the chemotaxins released by the infected epithelial cells but also due to the direct up-regulation of ICAM-1 on RSV-infected lung endothelial cells. Thus, infection of lung endothelial cells by RSV may result in the activation of lung endothelia and in the augmentation of inflammatory processes.
Materials and Methods
Statistics
If not stated otherwise, the results obtained by flow cytometry studies are presented as means and SEM (MFI ± SEM) or percentage of cells ± SEM. The significance was evaluated by two-sided Student’s t test.
Results
RSV infection of human endothelial cells
To analyze whether human endothelial cells are targets for RSV infection, we infected HUVEC, HMVEC-L, and HPAEC with RSV. The replication of RSV was determined by analyzing the expression of the virus F protein on the cell surface of infected endothelial cells by FACS analysis. As shown in Fig. 1A1, HUVEC expressed the viral F protein after 24 h postinfection on their cell surfaces. Only the addition of infectious virus particles led to the expression of cell surface F protein. In contrast, virus particles inactivated by UV irradiation were not able to induce any F protein expression (Fig. 1, A1 and B). Therefore, virus replication was a prerequisite for the expression of F protein on HUVEC cells. Similar results were obtained with an Ab specific for the G protein (data not shown). When an isotype-matched control Ab was used in place of the mAb specific for the F protein, cells that had been infected with RSV did not stain positive. Similar fluorescence histograms were obtained with noninfected cells stained with anti-F protein mAb (Fig. 1A1, dashed line). The maximal expression of F protein was determined on HUVEC 24 h subsequent to infection. Additional infection studies performed with HUVEC verified that the expression of F protein increased in a time- and RSV-dose-dependent manner during the first 24 h postinfection (Fig. 1B). When we analyzed the F-protein expression on RSV-infected HPAEC, we observed a similar expression pattern (data not shown). In contrast, HMVEC-L infected with RSV did not stain positive for F protein during the first 24 h following infection. However, thereafter, the expression of F protein increased steadily and reached its maximum after 72 h postinfection (Fig. 1A2). Beyond an incubation time of 72 h, all infected endothelial cell cultures showed increasing cytopathic effects and cell death occurred. During our performed experiments we observed no apoptotic cell processes determined by microscopic analysis instead of necrotic cell death in RSV-infected endothelial cell cultures. To determine whether the infection of endothelial cells resulted in the release of new infectious progeny virus, the cell supernatants were titrated. As depicted in Fig. 1C, all three endothelial cell types produced new progeny virus. Especially the infection of HMVEC-L led to a prominent release of new infectious RSV particles. For control, when supernatants were titrated as early as 12 h postinfection, no infectious particles were found. Therefore, the primary addition of RSV does not account for the progeny virus determined after 48 h.
As early as 24 h postinfection, an increased ICAM-1 expression was observed on HUVEC and HPAEC. This expression of ICAM-1 increased steadily with prolonged incubation time up to 72 h (Fig. 2, A and B). Thereafter, expression declined due to increasing cytotoxicity (data not shown). Similar to the delayed F protein expression observed on RSV-infected HMVEC-L, we obtained no significant up-regulation of ICAM-1 on these cells during the first 24 h postinfection (Fig. 2C). Thereafter, the increasing F protein expression paralleled the RSV-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 on HMVEC-L up to 96 h postinfection. Subsequently, cell cytotoxicity increased and ICAM-1 expression declined (data not shown). When RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression was directly compared between the different endothelial cell types, HUVEC expressed the most increased ICAM-1 cell surface expression (Fig. 2A).
The addition of nonreplicative UV-inactivated RSV did not induce ICAM-1 expression beyond the constitutive expression level (data not shown) suggesting that productive infection of all three endothelial cell types under investigation was a prerequisite for the observed RSV-dependent ICAM-1 up-regulation.
In contrast to ICAM-1, we observed that the expression of selectins (CD62P, CD62E) was not inducible by RSV neither on HUVEC nor on HMVEC-L and HPAEC, respectively (data not shown).
Enhanced VCAM-1 expression only on RSV-infected HUVEC
Recently, the enhanced expression of VCAM-1 on RSV-infected A549 cells was reported (29). When we analyzed endothelial cells for VCAM-1 expression they did not stain constitutively positive for VCAM-1. Subsequent to RSV infection, only HUVEC up-regulated VCAM-1 on their cell surface 24 h after their infection. This expression increased with prolonged incubation time up to 72 h (Fig. 3A). The maximal percentage of VCAM-1-positive cells was observed after 72 h postinfection (Fig. 3, A and B). Although a m.o.i. of 5 was used throughout these infection studies, HUVEC stained only positive for VCAM-1 in the range of 30%. Similar to ICAM-1 expression, the addition of noninfectious virus (m.o.i. = 5, inactivated by UV-irradiation) did not induce VCAM-1 expression on HUVEC (data not shown). To verify that the HUVEC under study were still able to up-regulate VCAM-1 in a TNF--dependent manner, peaking at 4–6 h, we determined VCAM-1 in our in vitro cell culture system on HUVEC activated with TNF-. As shown in Fig. 3C, HUVEC showed a significant VCAM-1 expression after 6 h following TNF- stimulation.
Cellular ICAM-1 mRNA amount is increased in RSV-infected endothelial cells
To study the RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression in more detail, we performed RT-PCR experiments. In HPAEC, transcripts for ICAM-1 were detectable only at low levels in noninfected cells (Fig. 4, lane 1) but RSV infection induced enhanced message levels in a dose-dependent manner (compare lane 1 with lanes 2–6). When compared with noninfected cells (lane 1), the amount of cellular ICAM-1 mRNA was most prominent in cells infected with RSV at a m.o.i. of 5 (lane 6). Exposure of HPAEC to nonreplicative virus (RSV-UV) did not increase the amount of ICAM-1 mRNA when compared with noninfected cells (lane 1 and 7). To verify inherent PCR specificity, a positive control, supplied by the manufacturer, was amplified in parallel and resulted in a visible band of 320 bp in size (lane 8). Similar results showing an enhanced amount of cellular ICAM-1 mRNA were obtained when HUVEC and HMVEC-L were infected with RSV (data not shown).
RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 is not mediated by an autocrine mechanism
It is well known that ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 are markedly up-regulated on endothelial cells by the proinflammatory cytokines TNF- and IL-1, respectively (30, 31), and that HUVEC and microvascular endothelial cells are able to secrete a variety of cytokines (32). Therefore, we hypothesized that RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 is partly mediated by an autocrine mechanism as it was reported for A549 epithelial cells (33). However, we observed no cytokine (IL-1, IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-)-mediated up-regulation of ICAM-1 on HUVEC and HPAEC. In addition, VCAM-1 expression on HUVEC 24 h postinfection was also not mediated by an autocrine mechanism (data not shown).
RSV induces ICAM-1 expression in a PI3K-, PKA and PKC-, and p38 MAPK-dependent manner
We next used pharmacological inhibitors to investigate whether RSV-dependent ICAM-1 expression on HUVEC might be mediated through the activity of one or more intracellular signaling pathways. Recently, evidence accumulated that activation of the PI3K (34), the ERK1/ERK2 (35), and the PKC (36) occur in RSV-infected human epithelial cells. Therefore, we asked whether the activity of intermediate kinases might be a prerequisite for the RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 on HUVEC. We analyzed HUVEC because ICAM-1 was most markedly up-regulated on these cells. Cell monolayers were pretreated with these inhibitors for 30 min, infected with RSV and then incubated in the presence of these pharmacological substances for further 48 h. As can be seen from Fig. 5, the exposure of HUVEC with the PI3K inhibitor Ly294002 inhibited nearly completely the RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation. Furthermore, inhibition of the PKC by means of the myristoylated EGF-R inhibitor peptide as well as inhibition of PKA activity by KT5720, respectively, inhibited significantly the RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation. In contrast, inhibition of the protein kinase G through the specific inhibitor RP-8-Br-cGMP did not modulate ICAM-1 expression. With regard to MAPK signaling pathways, we determined the effect of the MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059, the JNK peptide inhibitor 1 (L-JNKI-1), and the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 on RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression. As shown, only the inhibition of the p38 MAPK cascade through SB203580 diminished the cell surface ICAM-1 expression on RSV-infected HUVEC in a significant manner. The involvement of p38 kinase activity was further substantiated by analyzing a second specific p38 kinase inhibitor, i.e., 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-pyridin-4-yl-1,2-dihydropyrazol-3-one used at a concentration of 1 μM. Similar data were obtained (data not shown).
RSV infection of endothelial cells induces adhesion of PMN and U937 cells
A leukocyte adhesion assay was performed to investigate whether the RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression on HUVEC, HMVEC-L and HPAEC might be responsible for an increased adhesion of immune effector cells. For this purpose, RSV-infected endothelial cell monolayers were cocultured with PMA-activated U937 cells, a promyelocytic cell line, and PMN, respectively. Infection of all three endothelial cell types with RSV induced at least a 2-fold increase in the adhesion of U937 cells and PMN (Fig. 6A). Furthermore, with regard to HMVEC-L the adhesion of U937 cells increased 3-fold compared with noninfected cells, and PMN were 5-fold more adherent to RSV-infected HUVEC when compared with noninfected cells. To analyze whether the observed increased ICAM-1 cell surface expression might be responsible for the increased adhesion rate of PMN to RSV-infected HUVEC, we cocultured PMN in the presence of blocking mAb specific for ICAM-1, VCAM-1, or isotype IgG1 Ab. As shown in Fig. 6B, preincubation of the monolayers with specific blocking ICAM-1 mAb diminished the adhesion rate of PMN from 5- to 2-fold compared with noninfected cells. In contrast, with regard to the adhesion of PMN blocking of VCAM-1 or addition of isotype control IgG1 Ab was without any influence. Therefore, ICAM-1 up-regulated on RSV-infected endothelial cells showed functional integrity.
RSV infection of endothelial cells results in higher transmigration rates of PMN
To determine whether the increased adhesion of PMN to RSV-infected endothelial cells might result in an increased transmigration rate, confluent endothelial cell monolayers, grown on polycarbonate filters, were cocultured with purified PMN. The PMN were allowed to settle and migrate for 3 h across noninfected and RSV-infected intact endothelial cell monolayers. To provide a chemotactic gradient for the cocultured PMN, the medium of the lower well compartment contained the chemotaxin IL-8 at a concentration of 10 ng/ml. This in vitro transmigration model should mimic the IL-8 chemotaxin gradient established by the RSV-infected lung epithelial cell in the course of an ongoing RSV infection. As depicted in Fig. 7, migration of PMN across RSV-infected monolayers, regardless of the endothelial type used, was significantly enhanced when compared with noninfected monolayers. The transmigration rate increased always in a RSV-dose-dependent manner. However, the RSV-induced transmigration rate differed with respect to the endothelial cell type used; the order of potency was: HUVEC > HMVEC-L > HPAEC.
Discussion
Following RSV infection, an increased number of immune effector cells accumulate in the lung tissue and airway lumen (12). Everard et al. (13) reported that PMN accounted for 93 and 76% of the cells recovered by BAL from central and peripheral airways of infants suffering from RSV bronchiolitis. However, detailed knowledge elucidating the RSV-induced recruitment of immune effector cells as well as development of the inflammatory response is failing.
In the case of RSV infection of the lower respiratory tract, the microvascular endothelial cells of the pulmonary capillaries are in intimate contact with the RSV-infected lung epithelial cells. Our data presented in this study report for the first time that primary lung endothelial cells (HMVEC-L, HPAEC) and HUVEC are target cells for RSV infection. The cells expressed viral F protein on their cell surface and shed infectious progeny virus into the cell supernatant. These results are in agreement with data recently published by Visseren at al. (20) showing that HUVEC are permissive for RSV infection and respond thereafter with an increased procoagulant activity.
Our data show that subsequent to RSV infection all three endothelial cell types up-regulated their ICAM-1 expression in a time- and virus-load-dependent manner. Similar to A549 cells replication of RSV was always a prerequisite for ICAM-1 up-regulation on all three endothelial cell types (data not shown for HMVEC-L and HPAEC).
It has been shown by Chini et al. (37) that the enhanced expression of ICAM-1 on RSV-infected lung epithelial cells was dependent on novel mRNA synthesis. They supplied evidence that the NF-B and C/EBP binding sequences located in the ICAM-1 promoter are required for RSV-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1. Similar to RSV-infected lung epithelial cells we observed an increased amount of cellular ICAM-1 mRNA in endothelial cells infected with RSV suggesting that the enhanced cell surface expression of ICAM-1 is primarily mediated via an increased gene transcription activity and de novo protein synthesis. In this regard, when RSV-infected endothelial cells were cultured in the presence of actinomycin D (5 μg/ml), aspirin (1 mM), or cycloheximide (10 μg/ml) the RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation was substantially inhibited (data not shown).
The release of IL-1 from RSV-infected A549 lung epithelial cells is well recognized for its pivotal role in mediating ICAM-1 expression in an autocrine manner (33) as well as for its paracrine ICAM-1 inducing effect on HUVEC (38). Our data presented in this study indicate that neither IL-1, IL-1, IL-6, nor TNF-, possibly secreted from infected endothelial cells, are responsible for the up-regulation of ICAM-1 on RSV-infected HUVEC and HPAEC, respectively.
Beside the RSV-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 we observed no up-regulation of selectins and VCAM-1 on RSV-infected human HMVEC-L and HPAEC up to 24 h postinfection. Only, RSV-infected HUVEC expressed VCAM-1 on their cell surface 24 h postinfection, but similar to primary lung endothelial cells no up-regulation of selectins was observed. In contrast to the postcapillary venules of the systemic circulation, where PMN emigration normally occurs, the pulmonary capillaries are the primary site of emigration in the pulmonary circulation and rolling does not occur (39). Due to the size of the vascular diameter, the PMN are trapped within the capillaries. Therefore, an increased expression of selectins seems not to be a prerequisite for the extravasation of PMN out of the pulmonary capillaries. Trapped PMN, additionally activated via soluble proinflammatory mediators, i.e., chemotaxins, as well as cell-cell interactions, become enlarged and more rigid, thereby increasing their retention in the lung capillaries.
All leukocytes use the 2-integrin/ICAM-1 interaction for adhesion and transmigration. In this study we observed an increased adhesion of PMN and monocytic cells (PMA-activated U937 cells) to RSV-infected endothelial cells. For PMN, we verified that this increased adhesion was dependent on the increased cell surface amount of ICAM-1. We hypothesize that leukocytes migrating out of the bloodstream into the pulmonary circulation of the RSV-infected lung become additionally activated by soluble inflammatory mediators in a paracrine fashion, i.e., via IL-6, IL-8, and RANTES released from RSV-infected endothelial cells (our unpublished observations) or IL-8 and IL-1 released from RSV-infected epithelial cells (5, 33).
The increased binding rate of PMN to all three RSV-infected endothelial cell types under investigation resulted in an enhanced in vitro transmigration rate. Because PMN adhere and transmigrate always in a VCAM-1-independent manner, our finding that VCAM-1 was not up-regulated on RSV-infected lung endothelial cells should be without influence concerning the emigration rate of PMN. However, whether the RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation mediating the increased adhesion of PMN to lung endothelial cells might be automatically involved in the transmigration process is still not known. Evidence accumulated that beside the well-known 2-integrin-dependent transmigration process, a 2-integrin-independent migration mechanism of PMN does exist in the lung (40, 41). Within the lung, this pathway is restricted to the lung capillaries. Recent data suggest that Gram-negative organisms induce a CD11/CD18-dependent PMN emigration out of the lung capillaries, whereas Gram-positive organisms elicit a CD11/CD18-independent emigration (42). However, in light of new published data this distinction obviously oversimplifies this multiform process. Which of these both transmigration mechanisms are actually operative is also in part dependent on the chronicity of reactions as well as on the various chemotaxins (43, 44). Thus, a CD18-independent transendothelial migration of PMN can be stimulated in vitro by the host-derived chemoattractants IL-8 and leukotriene B4 (45). Because we used an IL-8 chemotaxin gradient in our in vitro transmigration model we suggest that cocultured PMN migrated in a CD18-independent way through the RSV-infected endothelial monolayer. In that case, the observed increased transmigration rate should be a direct consequence of the enhanced ICAM-1-mediated adhesion rate. However, future experiments have to address this point.
Concerning RSV infection there is currently no effective antiviral or anti-inflammatory treatment available. The analysis of the signal transduction pathways mediating the detrimental RSV-induced ICAM-1 cell surface expression may lead to the development of novel anti-inflammatory strategies. Therefore, we used pharmacological inhibitors to investigate which signaling pathways must be present in an active state to allow for RSV-induced up-regulation of ICAM-1 on HUVEC. Our data show that inhibition of PI3K by means of LY294002 reduced the RSV-induced ICAM-1 expression in a significant manner. Quite recently, Thomas et al. (34) reported that the RSV-induced apoptosis is delayed by activation of the PI3/Akt survival pathway. In this study, the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 was used at a concentration of 50 μM. We used the PI3K inhibitor at a nearly 10-times lower concentration, i.e., 6.4 μM, and observed no inhibitor-dependent cytotoxicity in RSV-infected HUVEC. Whether these divergent results are due to the different cell types used or result from the different inhibitor concentrations is still not known. Nevertheless, our data clearly show that PI3K activity is a prerequisite for RSV-induced ICAM-1 up-regulation. Furthermore, the inhibition of PKC- and PKA activity, before infection with RSV, diminished significantly the ICAM-1 up-regulation on HUVEC. Recently, studies performed by Monick et al. (36) showed that RSV activates multiple PKC isoforms in A549 lung epithelial cells, which subsequently leads to the activation of ERK. Three major types of MAPK cascades have been reported in mammalian cells, namely the ERK1/ERK2 cascade, the JNK/stress-activated protein kinase cascade, and the p38 kinase pathway. The activity of the MEK, ERK and p38 kinase in RSV-infected epithelial cells has been linked to RSV replication, IL-8 release, and posttranscriptional RANTES gene expression, respectively (35, 46, 47). Moreover, it was reported that expression of TNF- and IL-1 in RSV-infected epithelial cells required the activation of the p38 MAPK pathway (48). Our data supply evidence that only the p38 MAPK pathway must be in an active state to allow for RSV-dependent ICAM-1 up-regulation. In summary, different protein kinases, i.e., PI3K, PKC, PKA, and p38 kinase, respectively, control the RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 on HUVEC. Whether RSV-infected lung endothelial cells show an identical signal transduction pattern remains to be determined. Differences might exist as it was observed for HUVEC and primary endothelial cells (22) and rat pulmonary arterial vs rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (49). Nevertheless, in comparison to HMVEC-L and HPAEC the RSV-induced expression of ICAM-1 was most prominent on HUVEC leading to the highest adhesion and transmigration rate of PMN. With regard to these data as well as their availability and reproduction, we suggest that HUVEC are a useful in vitro RSV infection model for analyzing the role of lung endothelial cells during an ongoing primary RSV infection. A comparison with primary lung endothelial cells, which has been done in our study will clarify the importance of novel results.
In summary, we conclude that pulmonary endothelial cells are target cells for productive RSV infection. Due to the up-regulation of ICAM-1 they might contribute to the detrimental accumulation of PMN into the RSV-infected lung. Therefore, similar to the RSV-infected lung epithelial cells they are intimately involved in the innate proinflammatory immune response.
Footnotes
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ralf Arnold, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Leipzigerstrasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. E-mail address: ralf.arnold{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; F protein, fusion protein; HMVEC-L, human lung microvascular endothelial cell; HPAEC, human pulmonary lung aorta endothelial cell; m.o.i., multiplicity of infection; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; EGF-R, epidermal growth-factor receptor; EGM-2, endothelial growth medium-2; PMN, polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocyte; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
Received for publication November 4, 2004. Accepted for publication March 7, 2005.
References
McIntosh, K.. 1997. Respiratory syncytial virus. S. A. Evans, and R. A. Kaslow, eds. Viral Infections of Humans: Epidemiology and Control 691-711 Plenum Publishing, New York. .
Hall, C. B., C. A. McCarthy. 2000. Respiratory syncytial virus. G. L. Mandell, and J. E. Benett, and R. Dolin, eds. Principles and Practise of Infectious Diseases 1782-1801 Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia. .
Falsey, A. R., E. E. Walsh. 2000. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 371-384.
Garofalo, R. P., H. Haeberle. 2000. Epithelial regulation of innate immunity to respiratory syncytial virus. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 23: 581-585.
Arnold, R., B. Humbert, H. Werchau, H. Gallati, W. K?nig. 1994. Interleukin-8, interleukin-6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type I release from a human pulmonary epithelial cell line (A549) exposed to respiratory syncytial virus. Immunology 82: 126-133
Olszewska-Pazdrak, B., A. Casola, T. Saito, R. Alam, S. E. Crowe, F. Mei, P. L. Ogra, R. P. Garofalo. 1998. Cell-specific expression of RANTES, MCP-1 and MIP-1 by lower airway epithelial cells and eosinophils infected with respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. 72: 4756-4764.(Ralf Arnold1 and Wolfgang)