Peginterferon Alfa-2a Alone, Lamivudine Alone, and the Two in Combination in Patients with HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B
http://www.100md.com
《新英格兰医药杂志》
ABSTRACT
Background Available treatments for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–negative chronic hepatitis B are associated with poor sustained responses. As a result, nucleoside and nucleotide analogues are typically continued indefinitely, a strategy associated with the risk of resistance and unknown long-term safety implications.
Methods We compared the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (180 μg once weekly) plus placebo, peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (100 mg daily), and lamivudine alone in 177, 179, and 181 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, respectively. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks.
Results After 24 weeks of follow-up, the percentage of patients with normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels or hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels below 20,000 copies per milliliter was significantly higher with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (59 percent and 43 percent, respectively) and peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (60 percent and 44 percent) than with lamivudine monotherapy (44 percent, P=0.004 and P=0.003, respectively; and 29 percent, P=0.007 and P=0.003, respectively). Rates of sustained suppression of HBV DNA to below 400 copies per milliliter were 19 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, 20 percent with combination therapy, and 7 percent with lamivudine alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons with lamivudine alone). Loss of hepatitis B surface antigen occurred in 12 patients in the peginterferon groups, as compared with 0 patients in the group given lamivudine alone. Adverse events, including pyrexia, fatigue, myalgia, and headache, were less frequent with lamivudine monotherapy than with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy or combination therapy.
Conclusions Patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B had significantly higher rates of response, sustained for 24 weeks after the cessation of therapy, with peginterferon alfa-2a than with lamivudine. The addition of lamivudine to peginterferon alfa-2a did not improve post-therapy response rates.
Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major global health problem, affecting more than 400 million people worldwide.1 Chronic hepatitis B is associated with serious complications, including liver failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–negative chronic hepatitis B represents a late phase of the infection that is characterized by progressive liver damage2,3 and viral variants with changes in the precore or core promoter region,4,5 which abolish or suppress the expression of HBeAg. Spontaneous, sustained remissions are rare in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B,6 which has a poor prognosis. HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B occurs throughout the world, and its prevalence is increasing.4,6
HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B responds well to currently available therapies during treatment. However, relapse rates are high after treatment cessation, and the rates of sustained response are poor.7,8,9,10 Current consensus guidelines recommend the use of interferon alfa or nucleoside or nucleotide analogues as first-line therapy for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.6,11,12,13 However, conventional interferon alfa has suboptimal pharmacokinetics, necessitating an inconvenient dosing regimen. Lamivudine is associated with drug resistance, which increases with extended use.14,15 Studies in patients with chronic hepatitis B have produced conflicting results regarding the benefits of combining interferon alfa and lamivudine,16,17,18 and the role of such combinations in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B requires further clarification.
Peginterferon alfa-2a, created by attaching a large, branched, 40-kD polyethylene glycol molecule to interferon alfa-2a,19 has better pharmacokinetics than conventional interferon alfa.20 This allows for convenient once-weekly dosing, with effective serum levels maintained throughout the dosing interval.20 Peginterferon alfa-2a, like conventional interferon alfa, has a dual immunomodulatory and antiviral mode of action but has yielded superior clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C21 and patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.22 The current study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of three regimens in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and lamivudine monotherapy.
Methods
Study Design
This multicenter, randomized, partially double-blind study was conducted at 54 sites in 13 countries, principally in Asia and Europe. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 180 μg of peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, Roche) once weekly plus oral placebo once daily, 180 μg of peginterferon alfa-2a once weekly plus 100 mg of lamivudine (Epivir-HBV or Zeffix, GlaxoSmithKline) once daily, or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily. Randomization was centralized and stratified according to geographic region and alanine aminotransferase levels. The study, which comprised 48 weeks of treatment followed by 24 weeks of follow-up, was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of Good Clinical Practice. All patients gave written informed consent.
The study was designed by the sponsor (Roche) in collaboration with expert hepatologists. Clinical data were collected by the Peginterferon Alfa-2a HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Study Group. The sponsor held the data and conducted the statistical analyses; the principal authors had full access to the data and were actively involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data and the drafting of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Patients
Adult patients were eligible if they had been negative for HBeAg and positive for anti-HBe antibody and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) for at least six months, had an HBV DNA level of more than 100,000 copies per milliliter, had a serum alanine aminotransferase level that was greater than 1 but less than or equal to 10 times the upper limit of the normal range, and had had findings on a liver biopsy within the previous 24 months consistent with the presence of chronic hepatitis B, with evidence of prominent necroinflammatory activity (as assessed by a local pathologist). Exclusion criteria included decompensated liver disease, a coexisting serious medical or psychiatric illness, a neutrophil count of less than 1500 per cubic millimeter, a platelet count of less than 90,000 per cubic millimeter, a serum creatinine level that was more than 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range, a history of alcohol or drug abuse within one year before entry, treatment for chronic hepatitis B within the previous six months, and coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis D virus or human immunodeficiency virus.
Efficacy Measures
Efficacy analyses included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The study had two predetermined primary measures of efficacy assessed after 24 weeks of follow-up: the normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels and the suppression of HBV DNA levels to below 20,000 copies per milliliter. Alanine aminotransferase was measured at local laboratories in accordance with standard procedures. Serum HBV DNA was measured at one of three central laboratories with the use of the Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor Test (Roche Diagnostics).
Secondary efficacy measures assessed after 24 weeks of follow-up included the proportion of patients with HBsAg loss, HBsAg seroconversion (defined by the loss of HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBs antibody), histologic response, and suppression of HBV DNA to below 400 copies per milliliter. A histologic response was defined as a reduction of at least two points in the modified Histologic Activity Index score as compared with the pretreatment score. Scores for this index can range from 0 to 24, with inflammation graded from 0 (none) to 18 (severe) and fibrosis graded from 0 (none) to 6 (cirrhosis).23 Biopsy samples were scored by an independent histopathologist who was unaware of the timing of the biopsy or the patient's treatment assignment. Ranked assessments of necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis were also performed (and scored as improved, unchanged, or worse).
Safety Analysis
Measures of safety included adverse events, hematologic measurements, clinical chemical measurements, and vital signs. Adverse events were graded on a three-point scale (mild, moderate, and severe), and causality was determined by the investigator. Safety was assessed at baseline; at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 and every six weeks thereafter throughout treatment; and every four weeks during follow-up. Safety analyses included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and who underwent at least one safety assessment after baseline.
Resistance Analysis
At the end of treatment (week 48), HBV DNA was extracted from all available serum samples from patients in the two lamivudine groups. Mutations in the YMDD (tyrosine, methionine, aspartate, and aspartate) motif of the HBV polymerase gene were identified by means of the INNO-LiPA HBV DR assay (Innogenetics).24
Statistical Analysis
A sample size of 160 patients per treatment group provided the study with a statistical power of 80 percent at the 0.025 level of significance to detect a difference in response rates of 15 percent. The sample size was increased to 175 patients to allow for withdrawals. The goals of the study were considered to have been reached in the event of a significant result for either primary efficacy outcome. Therefore, a significance level of 0.025 was chosen for the two primary efficacy measures to maintain the overall significance level at 0.05. For secondary efficacy measures, the level of significance was set at 0.05.
The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test, stratified according to geographic region and pretreatment alanine aminotransferase level, was used to compare differences in response rates between the treatment groups. Only if the overall test of the treatment effect was significant were pairwise comparisons performed. Fisher's exact test was used when appropriate. For each treatment group, response rates were computed with their corresponding 95 percent confidence intervals. No interim analyses were performed. Response rates were calculated for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, according to the intention-to-treat principle. Patients with values missing at week 72 were classified as having no response.
Results
Characteristics of the Patients
Of the 552 patients who underwent randomization, 537 were included in the analyses. Five patients randomly assigned to receive peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, seven assigned to peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and three assigned to lamivudine monotherapy were excluded from analyses — six did not receive study medication, and all nine patients from a single center were excluded owing to irregularities in study conduct. Of the 537 patients included in the analyses, 26 receiving lamivudine, 17 receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and 12 receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy either did not complete treatment or did not enter or complete follow-up. Baseline demographic and other characteristics were similar among the three treatment groups (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Patients.
Biochemical Response
At the end of treatment (week 48), the proportion of patients with normalized alanine aminotransferase levels was highest with lamivudine monotherapy (Table 2). After 24 weeks of follow-up (week 72), the percentage of patients with normalized alanine aminotransferase levels was significantly higher with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (59 percent) and peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (60 percent) than with lamivudine monotherapy (44 percent; P=0.004 and P=0.003, respectively) (Table 2 and Figure 1A). The patterns of alanine aminotransferase levels throughout the study are shown in Figure 2A.
Table 2. Rates of Biochemical, Virologic, and Histologic Response.
Figure 1. Rates of Biochemical Response (Panel A) and Virologic Response (Panel B) after 24 Weeks of Follow-up.
A biochemical response was defined as the normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels. A virologic response was defined as an HBV DNA level of less than 20,000 copies per milliliter. Differences were assessed by means of the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test, stratified according to geographic region and pretreatment alanine aminotransferase level. The number of patients in each group is shown in each bar, and the percentage of patients with a response in each group is shown above each bar.
Figure 2. Mean Serum Alanine Aminotransferase Levels (Panel A) and HBV DNA Levels (Panel B) during the 72-Week Study Period.
During therapy, marked elevations in alanine aminotransferase (more than 10 times the upper limit of the normal range, or more than 300 IU per liter) were observed in a significantly higher percentage of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (12 percent) than peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (4 percent) or lamivudine monotherapy (6 percent; P=0.007 and P=0.038, respectively). In contrast, the percentage of patients with marked elevations in alanine aminotransferase levels after therapy was significantly higher with lamivudine monotherapy (14 percent) or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (15 percent) than with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (7 percent; P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively). There was a significant association between a marked elevation in alanine aminotransferase during therapy and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels at week 72 (P=0.01).
Virologic Response
At week 48, the percentage of patients with HBV DNA levels below 20,000 copies per milliliter was highest with the combination regimen (Table 2). At week 72, suppression of HBV DNA levels to below 20,000 copies per milliliter occurred in a significantly higher percentage of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (43 percent) or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (44 percent) than lamivudine monotherapy (29 percent; P=0.007 and P=0.003, respectively) (Table 2 and Figure 1B). Rates of suppression of HBV DNA to below 400 copies per milliliter at week 72 were 19 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, 20 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and 7 percent with lamivudine alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons with lamivudine alone).
After 48 weeks, the extent of suppression of HBV DNA from baseline was greatest with peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (Table 2); the extent of HBV DNA suppression was similar with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and lamivudine monotherapy. The patterns of HBV DNA levels throughout the study are shown in Figure 2B.
HBsAg Response
At week 72, HBsAg loss occurred in seven patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (five Asian and two white patients) and in five receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (four and one, respectively). HBsAg seroconversion (defined by the loss of HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBs antibody) occurred in five patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and three receiving the combination regimen. At week 72, HBsAg loss or seroconversion was not identified in any patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy. Differences in HBsAg loss and seroconversion between peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and lamivudine monotherapy were significant (P=0.007 and P=0.029, respectively, by Fisher's exact test).
Histologic Response
The rate of histologic response was similar among the three treatment groups (Table 2). There was a significant association between improved histologic activity and either a biochemical or virologic response at week 72, regardless of the treatment group (P<0.001). A histologic response occurred in 151 of 292 patients with a biochemical response (52 percent), as compared with 70 of 245 patients without a biochemical response (29 percent). A histologic response was seen in 116 of 208 patients with a virologic response (56 percent), as compared with 105 of 329 patients without a virologic response (32 percent).
Resistance
At week 48, YMDD mutations were detected in 32 of 179 patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy (18 percent) and 1 of 173 patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (1 percent, P<0.001 by Fisher's exact test).
Safety
The rate of withdrawal from therapy was low in all three groups (Table 3). The rates of adverse events were similar in the peginterferon alfa-2a and combination-therapy groups but were significantly less frequent in the lamivudine group. The most common adverse events were those known to occur with conventional interferon alfa therapy, including pyrexia, fatigue, myalgia, and headache (Table 3). Depression was infrequent during the study and was reported by six patients (3 percent) receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, eight patients (4 percent) receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and two patients (1 percent) receiving lamivudine monotherapy.
Table 3. Incidence of Discontinuation of Treatment, Dose Modification, and Adverse Events.
Twenty-six patients had a total of 27 serious adverse events: 9 (5 percent) patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, 12 patients (7 percent) receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and 5 patients (3 percent) receiving lamivudine monotherapy (Table 3). Nine patients had serious infections; however, the incidence was similar in each treatment group (1 to 2 percent). There were two cases of serious thyroid disorders in the peginterferon alfa-2a group. All other serious adverse events were single cases in a variety of body systems. Hepatic decompensation was not reported in any patient during the study period, even though 27 percent of patients had bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis on pretreatment liver biopsy.
Mean neutrophil and platelet counts were reduced during treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, yet returned to baseline levels shortly after treatment was stopped. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common reasons for dose modification (Table 3).
Discussion
We found that peginterferon alfa-2a alone or in combination with lamivudine resulted in higher rates of sustained response among patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B than did lamivudine monotherapy, as reflected by the normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels, suppression of HBV DNA, and the loss or seroconversion of HBsAg. Previous studies have suggested that low levels of viremia may be compatible with the presence of minimally active hepatitis B.12,25,26 In this study, over 40 percent of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a had HBV DNA levels below 20,000 copies per milliliter after 24 weeks of follow-up. This sustained suppression of HBV DNA (perhaps in combination with normalized alanine aminotransferase levels) might reduce the risk of end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. Longer follow-up is necessary to clarify the long-term benefits of peginterferon alfa-2a therapy.
In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, alanine aminotransferase flares during therapy with interferon alfa have been indicated as a significant predictor of response.27 However, this association is less clear in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. The identification of a significant association between alanine aminotransferase flares during treatment and response in this study indicate that alanine aminotransferase flares may also be predictive of response in these patients.
HBsAg loss or seroconversion after therapy is considered the ultimate therapeutic goal of anti-HBV therapy, since it is associated with positive long-term clinical outcomes.6,12,28 In this study, HBsAg loss was identified in 12 patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a alone or in combination with lamivudine, 8 of whom underwent HBsAg seroconversion by the end of 24 weeks of follow-up, as compared with none receiving lamivudine alone. This observation concurs with those of previous studies showing that interferon alfa therapy is associated with an HBsAg response in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.29 However, the HBsAg response elicited by conventional interferon alfa tends to occur later than that observed with peginterferon alfa-2a in this study.7,10,28 HBsAg loss or seroconversion was not reported in several clinical trials of lamivudine or adefovir in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.8,9,15,30 These results illustrate the importance of the dual immunomodulatory and antiviral effects of interferon-based therapies in the treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.
No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and combination groups after 24 weeks of follow-up. This finding extends those of other recent studies. For example, Santantonio and coworkers showed that adding conventional interferon alfa to lamivudine therapy did not increase response rates in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B when assessed 24 weeks after the end of treatment.18 Similarly, recent preliminary data have suggested that after 24 weeks of follow-up, the combination of peginterferon alfa-2b and lamivudine is no more effective than peginterferon alfa-2b monotherapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.31
Significantly fewer patients receiving combination therapy than lamivudine monotherapy had YMDD mutations at the end of treatment. This difference indicates that a more profound HBV DNA suppression, as seen during treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a in combination with lamivudine, may lead to a lower incidence of lamivudine resistance. This finding concurs with general theories on the development of antiviral drug resistance and confirms data reported in other studies of HBV.32 Longer follow-up of patients in this study may clarify any additional benefits of combination therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.
The tolerability and safety profiles of peginterferon alfa-2a alone and in combination with lamivudine were satisfactory, and there were no unexpected adverse effects. Moreover, the addition of lamivudine did not substantially alter the safety profile of peginterferon alfa-2a. The safety profile of peginterferon alfa-2a also compares favorably with the profiles described in previous studies of conventional interferon alfa in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.7,33 It is noteworthy that no patient, including those with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis, had hepatic decompensation during either treatment or follow-up.
The incidence of depression with peginterferon alfa-2a in this study (3 to 4 percent) was lower than previously observed among patients with chronic hepatitis C (16 to 20 percent).21,34 This finding concurs with previous data showing that the rate of depression is lower among patients with chronic hepatitis B than among patients with chronic hepatitis C, both at baseline and during interferon alfa therapy.35 The reasons for this remain unclear; however, virus-specific factors (e.g., HCV infection of the central nervous system) and host-susceptibility factors (e.g., the patient population and the presence of preexisting psychiatric disorders) may influence the rates of depression.35,36
The results of this large, multinational study demonstrate that peginterferon alfa-2a offers significantly improved efficacy over lamivudine in the treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. The ability of this agent to improve and sustain biochemical, virologic, and HBsAg response rates constitutes a therapeutic advance over current treatments, which are associated with poor rates of sustained response after the cessation of therapy. Our data demonstrate the possibility of achieving HBsAg loss or seroconversion in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B with the use of peginterferon alfa-2a and therefore support the use of this agent as a first-line therapy for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.
Supported by a research grant from Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Mr. Button and Dr. Pluck are employees of Roche. Dr. Marcellin reports having served as a consultant for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Bayer, Novartis, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Valeant Pharmaceuticals and as a lecturer for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Schering-Plough, and GlaxoSmithKline; Dr. Hadziyannis as a consultant and lecturer for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Schering-Plough, and GlaxoSmithKline; Dr. Yurdaydin as a consultant and lecturer for Roche and Gilead Sciences and as a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Diago as a consultant for Roche and a lecturer for Roche, Schering-Plough, and GlaxoSmithKline; and Drs. Lau, Bonino, and Piratvisuth as consultants and lecturers for Roche.
We are indebted to Dr. Friederike Zahm and Dr. Matei Popescu of Roche, Basel, Switzerland; Dr. Philip McCloud of Roche, Dee Why, Australia; and Dr. Martyn Corbey of Roche, United Kingdom, for their critical analysis of the study data.
* Other members of the Peginterferon Alfa-2a HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Study Group are listed in the Appendix.
Source Information
From the Service d'Hépatologie, INSERM Unité 481 and Centre de Recherches Claude Bernard sur les Hépatites Virales, H?pital Beaujon, Clichy, France (P.M.); Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (G.K.K.L.); Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carratere Scientifico, Ospedale Maggiore di Milano Policlinico, Milan, Italy (F.B.); the Division of Clinical Medicine I, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy (P.F.); the Department of Medicine and Hepatology, Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens (S.H.); the Digestive Disease Department, Beijing You An Hospital, Beijing (R.J.); the Department of Infectious Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China (Z.-M.L.); Songklanakarin Hospital, Songkla, Thailand (T.P.); Papageorgiou General Hospital, Pathology Clinic, Thessalonika, Greece (G.G.); University of Ankara, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (C.Y.); Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain (M.D.); University of Uludag, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey (S.G.); National Taiwan University Hospital, Internal Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (M.-Y.L.); Roche, Dee Why, Australia (P.B.); and Roche, Welwyn, United Kingdom (N.P.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Marcellin at the Service d'Hépatologie, INSERM Unité 481 and Centre de Recherches Claude Bernard sur les Hépatites Virales, H?pital Beaujon, 92110 Clichy, France, or at patrick.marcellin@bjn.ap-hop-paris.fr.
References
Lai CL, Ratziu V, Yuen MF, Poynard T. Viral hepatitis B. Lancet 2003;362:2089-2094.
Bonino F, Rosina F, Rizzetto M, et al. Chronic hepatitis in HBsAg carriers with serum HBV-DNA and anti-HBe. Gastroenterology 1986;90:1268-1273.
Hadziyannis SJ, Vassilopoulos D. Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2001;34:617-624.
Funk ML, Rosenberg DM, Lok ASF. World-wide epidemiology of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B and associated precore and core promoter variants. J Viral Hepat 2002;9:52-61.
Chu CJ, Keeffe EB, Han SH, et al. Prevalence of HBV precore/core promoter variants in the United States. Hepatology 2003;38:619-628.
EASL International Consensus Conference on Hepatitis B: 13-14 September, 2002 Geneva, Switzerland: consensus statement (long version). J Hepatol 2003;39:Suppl 1:S3-S25.
Manesis EK, Hadziyannis SJ. Interferon treatment and retreatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2001;121:101-109.
Santantonio T, Mazzola M, Iacovazzi T, Miglietta A, Guastadisegni A, Pastore G. Long-term follow-up of patients with anti-HBe/HBV DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B treated for 12 months with lamivudine. J Hepatol 2000;32:300-306.
Tassopoulos NC, Volpes R, Pastore G, et al. Post lamivudine treatment follow up of patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 1999;30:Suppl 1:117-117. abstract.
Oliveri F, Santantonio T, Bellati G, et al. Long term response to therapy of chronic anti-HBe-positive hepatitis B is poor independent of type and schedule of interferon. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1366-1372.
Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update of recommendations. Hepatology 2004;39:857-861.
Lok AS, McMahon BJ. AASLD Practice Guidelines 2003: chronic hepatitis B. (Accessed July 23, 2004, at http://www.aasld.org/netFORUMAASLD/eweb/docs/chronichep_B.pdf.)
Liaw YF, Leung N, Guan R, Lau GKK, Merican I. Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: an update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;18:239-245.
Liaw YF, Chien RN, Yeh CT, Tsai SL, Chu CM. Acute exacerbation and hepatitis B virus clearance after emergence of YMDD motif mutation during lamivudine therapy. Hepatology 1999;30:567-572.
Hadziyannis SJ, Papatheodoridis GV, Dimou E, Laras A, Papaioannou C. Efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2000;32:847-851.
Schalm SW, Heathcote J, Cianciara J, et al. Lamivudine and alpha interferon combination treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: a randomised trial. Gut 2000;46:562-568.
Barbaro G, Zechini F, Pellicelli AM, et al. Long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and lamivudine in combination compared to lamivudine monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B: an Italian multicenter, randomized trial. J Hepatol 2001;35:406-411.
Santantonio T, Niro GA, Sinisi E, et al. Lamivudine/interferon combination therapy in anti-HBe positive chronic hepatitis B patients: a controlled pilot study. J Hepatol 2002;36:799-804.
Bailon P, Palleroni A, Schaffer CA, et al. Rational design of a potent, long-lasting form of interferon: a 40 kDa branched polyethylene glycol-conjugated interferon alpha-2a for the treatment of hepatitis C. Bioconjug Chem 2001;12:195-202.
Perry CM, Jarvis B. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD): a review of its use in the management of chronic hepatitis C. Drugs 2001;61:2263-2288.
Zeuzem S, Feinman SV, Rasenack J, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1666-1672.
Cooksley WGE, Piratvisuth T, Lee S-D, et al. Peginterferon -2a (40KD): an advance in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat 2003;10:298-305.
Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 1995;22:696-699.
Lok AS, Zoulim F, Locarnini S, et al. Monitoring drug resistance in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients during lamivudine therapy: evaluation of performance of INNO-LiPA HBV DR assay. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:3729-3734.
Hadziyannis SJ, Alexopoulou A, Papakonstantinou A, Petraki K, Manesis E. Interferon treatment with or without oral ganciclovir in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a randomized study. J Viral Hepat 2000;7:235-240.
Martinot-Peignoux M, Boyer N, Colombat M, et al. Serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels and liver histology in inactive HBsAg carriers. J Hepatol 2002;36:543-546.
Nair S, Perrillo RP. Serum alanine aminotransferase flares during interferon treatment in chronic hepatitis B: is sustained clearance of HBV DNA dependent on levels of pretreatment viremia? Hepatology 2001;34:1021-1026.
Papatheodoridis GV, Manesis E, Hadziyannis SJ. The long-term outcome of interferon-alpha treated and untreated patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 2001;34:306-313.
Brunetto MR, Oliveri F, Coco B, et al. Outcome of anti-HBe positive chronic hepatitis B in alpha-interferon treated and untreated patients: a long term cohort study. J Hepatol 2002;36:263-270.
Hadziyannis SJ, Tassopoulos NC, Heathcote EJ, et al. Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2003;348:800-807.
Janssen HLA, Senturk H, Zeuzem S. Peginterferon alfa-2b and lamivudine combination therapy compared with peginterferon alfa-2b for chronic HBeAg-positive hepatitis B: a randomized, controlled trial in 307 patients. Hepatology 2003;38:Suppl 1:246A-246A. abstract.
Richman DD. The impact of drug resistance on the effectiveness of chemotherapy for chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2000;32:866-867.
Lampertico P, Del Ninno E, Vigano M, et al. Long-term suppression of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B by 24-month interferon therapy. Hepatology 2003;37:756-763.
Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347:975-982.
Koskinas J, Merkouraki P, Manesis E, Hadziyannis SJ. Assessment of depression in patients with chronic hepatitis: effect of interferon treatment. Dig Dis 2002;20:284-288.
Forton DM, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thomas HC. Cerebral dysfunction in chronic hepatitis C infection. J Viral Hepat 2003;10:81-86.(Patrick Marcellin, M.D., )
Background Available treatments for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–negative chronic hepatitis B are associated with poor sustained responses. As a result, nucleoside and nucleotide analogues are typically continued indefinitely, a strategy associated with the risk of resistance and unknown long-term safety implications.
Methods We compared the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (180 μg once weekly) plus placebo, peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (100 mg daily), and lamivudine alone in 177, 179, and 181 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, respectively. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks.
Results After 24 weeks of follow-up, the percentage of patients with normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels or hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels below 20,000 copies per milliliter was significantly higher with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (59 percent and 43 percent, respectively) and peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (60 percent and 44 percent) than with lamivudine monotherapy (44 percent, P=0.004 and P=0.003, respectively; and 29 percent, P=0.007 and P=0.003, respectively). Rates of sustained suppression of HBV DNA to below 400 copies per milliliter were 19 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, 20 percent with combination therapy, and 7 percent with lamivudine alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons with lamivudine alone). Loss of hepatitis B surface antigen occurred in 12 patients in the peginterferon groups, as compared with 0 patients in the group given lamivudine alone. Adverse events, including pyrexia, fatigue, myalgia, and headache, were less frequent with lamivudine monotherapy than with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy or combination therapy.
Conclusions Patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B had significantly higher rates of response, sustained for 24 weeks after the cessation of therapy, with peginterferon alfa-2a than with lamivudine. The addition of lamivudine to peginterferon alfa-2a did not improve post-therapy response rates.
Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major global health problem, affecting more than 400 million people worldwide.1 Chronic hepatitis B is associated with serious complications, including liver failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–negative chronic hepatitis B represents a late phase of the infection that is characterized by progressive liver damage2,3 and viral variants with changes in the precore or core promoter region,4,5 which abolish or suppress the expression of HBeAg. Spontaneous, sustained remissions are rare in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B,6 which has a poor prognosis. HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B occurs throughout the world, and its prevalence is increasing.4,6
HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B responds well to currently available therapies during treatment. However, relapse rates are high after treatment cessation, and the rates of sustained response are poor.7,8,9,10 Current consensus guidelines recommend the use of interferon alfa or nucleoside or nucleotide analogues as first-line therapy for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.6,11,12,13 However, conventional interferon alfa has suboptimal pharmacokinetics, necessitating an inconvenient dosing regimen. Lamivudine is associated with drug resistance, which increases with extended use.14,15 Studies in patients with chronic hepatitis B have produced conflicting results regarding the benefits of combining interferon alfa and lamivudine,16,17,18 and the role of such combinations in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B requires further clarification.
Peginterferon alfa-2a, created by attaching a large, branched, 40-kD polyethylene glycol molecule to interferon alfa-2a,19 has better pharmacokinetics than conventional interferon alfa.20 This allows for convenient once-weekly dosing, with effective serum levels maintained throughout the dosing interval.20 Peginterferon alfa-2a, like conventional interferon alfa, has a dual immunomodulatory and antiviral mode of action but has yielded superior clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C21 and patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.22 The current study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of three regimens in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and lamivudine monotherapy.
Methods
Study Design
This multicenter, randomized, partially double-blind study was conducted at 54 sites in 13 countries, principally in Asia and Europe. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 180 μg of peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, Roche) once weekly plus oral placebo once daily, 180 μg of peginterferon alfa-2a once weekly plus 100 mg of lamivudine (Epivir-HBV or Zeffix, GlaxoSmithKline) once daily, or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily. Randomization was centralized and stratified according to geographic region and alanine aminotransferase levels. The study, which comprised 48 weeks of treatment followed by 24 weeks of follow-up, was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of Good Clinical Practice. All patients gave written informed consent.
The study was designed by the sponsor (Roche) in collaboration with expert hepatologists. Clinical data were collected by the Peginterferon Alfa-2a HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Study Group. The sponsor held the data and conducted the statistical analyses; the principal authors had full access to the data and were actively involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data and the drafting of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Patients
Adult patients were eligible if they had been negative for HBeAg and positive for anti-HBe antibody and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) for at least six months, had an HBV DNA level of more than 100,000 copies per milliliter, had a serum alanine aminotransferase level that was greater than 1 but less than or equal to 10 times the upper limit of the normal range, and had had findings on a liver biopsy within the previous 24 months consistent with the presence of chronic hepatitis B, with evidence of prominent necroinflammatory activity (as assessed by a local pathologist). Exclusion criteria included decompensated liver disease, a coexisting serious medical or psychiatric illness, a neutrophil count of less than 1500 per cubic millimeter, a platelet count of less than 90,000 per cubic millimeter, a serum creatinine level that was more than 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range, a history of alcohol or drug abuse within one year before entry, treatment for chronic hepatitis B within the previous six months, and coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis D virus or human immunodeficiency virus.
Efficacy Measures
Efficacy analyses included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The study had two predetermined primary measures of efficacy assessed after 24 weeks of follow-up: the normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels and the suppression of HBV DNA levels to below 20,000 copies per milliliter. Alanine aminotransferase was measured at local laboratories in accordance with standard procedures. Serum HBV DNA was measured at one of three central laboratories with the use of the Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor Test (Roche Diagnostics).
Secondary efficacy measures assessed after 24 weeks of follow-up included the proportion of patients with HBsAg loss, HBsAg seroconversion (defined by the loss of HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBs antibody), histologic response, and suppression of HBV DNA to below 400 copies per milliliter. A histologic response was defined as a reduction of at least two points in the modified Histologic Activity Index score as compared with the pretreatment score. Scores for this index can range from 0 to 24, with inflammation graded from 0 (none) to 18 (severe) and fibrosis graded from 0 (none) to 6 (cirrhosis).23 Biopsy samples were scored by an independent histopathologist who was unaware of the timing of the biopsy or the patient's treatment assignment. Ranked assessments of necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis were also performed (and scored as improved, unchanged, or worse).
Safety Analysis
Measures of safety included adverse events, hematologic measurements, clinical chemical measurements, and vital signs. Adverse events were graded on a three-point scale (mild, moderate, and severe), and causality was determined by the investigator. Safety was assessed at baseline; at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 and every six weeks thereafter throughout treatment; and every four weeks during follow-up. Safety analyses included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and who underwent at least one safety assessment after baseline.
Resistance Analysis
At the end of treatment (week 48), HBV DNA was extracted from all available serum samples from patients in the two lamivudine groups. Mutations in the YMDD (tyrosine, methionine, aspartate, and aspartate) motif of the HBV polymerase gene were identified by means of the INNO-LiPA HBV DR assay (Innogenetics).24
Statistical Analysis
A sample size of 160 patients per treatment group provided the study with a statistical power of 80 percent at the 0.025 level of significance to detect a difference in response rates of 15 percent. The sample size was increased to 175 patients to allow for withdrawals. The goals of the study were considered to have been reached in the event of a significant result for either primary efficacy outcome. Therefore, a significance level of 0.025 was chosen for the two primary efficacy measures to maintain the overall significance level at 0.05. For secondary efficacy measures, the level of significance was set at 0.05.
The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test, stratified according to geographic region and pretreatment alanine aminotransferase level, was used to compare differences in response rates between the treatment groups. Only if the overall test of the treatment effect was significant were pairwise comparisons performed. Fisher's exact test was used when appropriate. For each treatment group, response rates were computed with their corresponding 95 percent confidence intervals. No interim analyses were performed. Response rates were calculated for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, according to the intention-to-treat principle. Patients with values missing at week 72 were classified as having no response.
Results
Characteristics of the Patients
Of the 552 patients who underwent randomization, 537 were included in the analyses. Five patients randomly assigned to receive peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, seven assigned to peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and three assigned to lamivudine monotherapy were excluded from analyses — six did not receive study medication, and all nine patients from a single center were excluded owing to irregularities in study conduct. Of the 537 patients included in the analyses, 26 receiving lamivudine, 17 receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and 12 receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy either did not complete treatment or did not enter or complete follow-up. Baseline demographic and other characteristics were similar among the three treatment groups (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Patients.
Biochemical Response
At the end of treatment (week 48), the proportion of patients with normalized alanine aminotransferase levels was highest with lamivudine monotherapy (Table 2). After 24 weeks of follow-up (week 72), the percentage of patients with normalized alanine aminotransferase levels was significantly higher with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (59 percent) and peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (60 percent) than with lamivudine monotherapy (44 percent; P=0.004 and P=0.003, respectively) (Table 2 and Figure 1A). The patterns of alanine aminotransferase levels throughout the study are shown in Figure 2A.
Table 2. Rates of Biochemical, Virologic, and Histologic Response.
Figure 1. Rates of Biochemical Response (Panel A) and Virologic Response (Panel B) after 24 Weeks of Follow-up.
A biochemical response was defined as the normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels. A virologic response was defined as an HBV DNA level of less than 20,000 copies per milliliter. Differences were assessed by means of the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test, stratified according to geographic region and pretreatment alanine aminotransferase level. The number of patients in each group is shown in each bar, and the percentage of patients with a response in each group is shown above each bar.
Figure 2. Mean Serum Alanine Aminotransferase Levels (Panel A) and HBV DNA Levels (Panel B) during the 72-Week Study Period.
During therapy, marked elevations in alanine aminotransferase (more than 10 times the upper limit of the normal range, or more than 300 IU per liter) were observed in a significantly higher percentage of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (12 percent) than peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (4 percent) or lamivudine monotherapy (6 percent; P=0.007 and P=0.038, respectively). In contrast, the percentage of patients with marked elevations in alanine aminotransferase levels after therapy was significantly higher with lamivudine monotherapy (14 percent) or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (15 percent) than with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (7 percent; P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively). There was a significant association between a marked elevation in alanine aminotransferase during therapy and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels at week 72 (P=0.01).
Virologic Response
At week 48, the percentage of patients with HBV DNA levels below 20,000 copies per milliliter was highest with the combination regimen (Table 2). At week 72, suppression of HBV DNA levels to below 20,000 copies per milliliter occurred in a significantly higher percentage of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (43 percent) or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (44 percent) than lamivudine monotherapy (29 percent; P=0.007 and P=0.003, respectively) (Table 2 and Figure 1B). Rates of suppression of HBV DNA to below 400 copies per milliliter at week 72 were 19 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, 20 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and 7 percent with lamivudine alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons with lamivudine alone).
After 48 weeks, the extent of suppression of HBV DNA from baseline was greatest with peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (Table 2); the extent of HBV DNA suppression was similar with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and lamivudine monotherapy. The patterns of HBV DNA levels throughout the study are shown in Figure 2B.
HBsAg Response
At week 72, HBsAg loss occurred in seven patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (five Asian and two white patients) and in five receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (four and one, respectively). HBsAg seroconversion (defined by the loss of HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBs antibody) occurred in five patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and three receiving the combination regimen. At week 72, HBsAg loss or seroconversion was not identified in any patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy. Differences in HBsAg loss and seroconversion between peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and lamivudine monotherapy were significant (P=0.007 and P=0.029, respectively, by Fisher's exact test).
Histologic Response
The rate of histologic response was similar among the three treatment groups (Table 2). There was a significant association between improved histologic activity and either a biochemical or virologic response at week 72, regardless of the treatment group (P<0.001). A histologic response occurred in 151 of 292 patients with a biochemical response (52 percent), as compared with 70 of 245 patients without a biochemical response (29 percent). A histologic response was seen in 116 of 208 patients with a virologic response (56 percent), as compared with 105 of 329 patients without a virologic response (32 percent).
Resistance
At week 48, YMDD mutations were detected in 32 of 179 patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy (18 percent) and 1 of 173 patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (1 percent, P<0.001 by Fisher's exact test).
Safety
The rate of withdrawal from therapy was low in all three groups (Table 3). The rates of adverse events were similar in the peginterferon alfa-2a and combination-therapy groups but were significantly less frequent in the lamivudine group. The most common adverse events were those known to occur with conventional interferon alfa therapy, including pyrexia, fatigue, myalgia, and headache (Table 3). Depression was infrequent during the study and was reported by six patients (3 percent) receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, eight patients (4 percent) receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and two patients (1 percent) receiving lamivudine monotherapy.
Table 3. Incidence of Discontinuation of Treatment, Dose Modification, and Adverse Events.
Twenty-six patients had a total of 27 serious adverse events: 9 (5 percent) patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, 12 patients (7 percent) receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, and 5 patients (3 percent) receiving lamivudine monotherapy (Table 3). Nine patients had serious infections; however, the incidence was similar in each treatment group (1 to 2 percent). There were two cases of serious thyroid disorders in the peginterferon alfa-2a group. All other serious adverse events were single cases in a variety of body systems. Hepatic decompensation was not reported in any patient during the study period, even though 27 percent of patients had bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis on pretreatment liver biopsy.
Mean neutrophil and platelet counts were reduced during treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine, yet returned to baseline levels shortly after treatment was stopped. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common reasons for dose modification (Table 3).
Discussion
We found that peginterferon alfa-2a alone or in combination with lamivudine resulted in higher rates of sustained response among patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B than did lamivudine monotherapy, as reflected by the normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels, suppression of HBV DNA, and the loss or seroconversion of HBsAg. Previous studies have suggested that low levels of viremia may be compatible with the presence of minimally active hepatitis B.12,25,26 In this study, over 40 percent of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a had HBV DNA levels below 20,000 copies per milliliter after 24 weeks of follow-up. This sustained suppression of HBV DNA (perhaps in combination with normalized alanine aminotransferase levels) might reduce the risk of end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. Longer follow-up is necessary to clarify the long-term benefits of peginterferon alfa-2a therapy.
In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, alanine aminotransferase flares during therapy with interferon alfa have been indicated as a significant predictor of response.27 However, this association is less clear in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. The identification of a significant association between alanine aminotransferase flares during treatment and response in this study indicate that alanine aminotransferase flares may also be predictive of response in these patients.
HBsAg loss or seroconversion after therapy is considered the ultimate therapeutic goal of anti-HBV therapy, since it is associated with positive long-term clinical outcomes.6,12,28 In this study, HBsAg loss was identified in 12 patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a alone or in combination with lamivudine, 8 of whom underwent HBsAg seroconversion by the end of 24 weeks of follow-up, as compared with none receiving lamivudine alone. This observation concurs with those of previous studies showing that interferon alfa therapy is associated with an HBsAg response in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.29 However, the HBsAg response elicited by conventional interferon alfa tends to occur later than that observed with peginterferon alfa-2a in this study.7,10,28 HBsAg loss or seroconversion was not reported in several clinical trials of lamivudine or adefovir in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.8,9,15,30 These results illustrate the importance of the dual immunomodulatory and antiviral effects of interferon-based therapies in the treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.
No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy and combination groups after 24 weeks of follow-up. This finding extends those of other recent studies. For example, Santantonio and coworkers showed that adding conventional interferon alfa to lamivudine therapy did not increase response rates in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B when assessed 24 weeks after the end of treatment.18 Similarly, recent preliminary data have suggested that after 24 weeks of follow-up, the combination of peginterferon alfa-2b and lamivudine is no more effective than peginterferon alfa-2b monotherapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.31
Significantly fewer patients receiving combination therapy than lamivudine monotherapy had YMDD mutations at the end of treatment. This difference indicates that a more profound HBV DNA suppression, as seen during treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a in combination with lamivudine, may lead to a lower incidence of lamivudine resistance. This finding concurs with general theories on the development of antiviral drug resistance and confirms data reported in other studies of HBV.32 Longer follow-up of patients in this study may clarify any additional benefits of combination therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.
The tolerability and safety profiles of peginterferon alfa-2a alone and in combination with lamivudine were satisfactory, and there were no unexpected adverse effects. Moreover, the addition of lamivudine did not substantially alter the safety profile of peginterferon alfa-2a. The safety profile of peginterferon alfa-2a also compares favorably with the profiles described in previous studies of conventional interferon alfa in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.7,33 It is noteworthy that no patient, including those with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis, had hepatic decompensation during either treatment or follow-up.
The incidence of depression with peginterferon alfa-2a in this study (3 to 4 percent) was lower than previously observed among patients with chronic hepatitis C (16 to 20 percent).21,34 This finding concurs with previous data showing that the rate of depression is lower among patients with chronic hepatitis B than among patients with chronic hepatitis C, both at baseline and during interferon alfa therapy.35 The reasons for this remain unclear; however, virus-specific factors (e.g., HCV infection of the central nervous system) and host-susceptibility factors (e.g., the patient population and the presence of preexisting psychiatric disorders) may influence the rates of depression.35,36
The results of this large, multinational study demonstrate that peginterferon alfa-2a offers significantly improved efficacy over lamivudine in the treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. The ability of this agent to improve and sustain biochemical, virologic, and HBsAg response rates constitutes a therapeutic advance over current treatments, which are associated with poor rates of sustained response after the cessation of therapy. Our data demonstrate the possibility of achieving HBsAg loss or seroconversion in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B with the use of peginterferon alfa-2a and therefore support the use of this agent as a first-line therapy for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.
Supported by a research grant from Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Mr. Button and Dr. Pluck are employees of Roche. Dr. Marcellin reports having served as a consultant for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Bayer, Novartis, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Valeant Pharmaceuticals and as a lecturer for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Schering-Plough, and GlaxoSmithKline; Dr. Hadziyannis as a consultant and lecturer for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Schering-Plough, and GlaxoSmithKline; Dr. Yurdaydin as a consultant and lecturer for Roche and Gilead Sciences and as a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Diago as a consultant for Roche and a lecturer for Roche, Schering-Plough, and GlaxoSmithKline; and Drs. Lau, Bonino, and Piratvisuth as consultants and lecturers for Roche.
We are indebted to Dr. Friederike Zahm and Dr. Matei Popescu of Roche, Basel, Switzerland; Dr. Philip McCloud of Roche, Dee Why, Australia; and Dr. Martyn Corbey of Roche, United Kingdom, for their critical analysis of the study data.
* Other members of the Peginterferon Alfa-2a HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Study Group are listed in the Appendix.
Source Information
From the Service d'Hépatologie, INSERM Unité 481 and Centre de Recherches Claude Bernard sur les Hépatites Virales, H?pital Beaujon, Clichy, France (P.M.); Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (G.K.K.L.); Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carratere Scientifico, Ospedale Maggiore di Milano Policlinico, Milan, Italy (F.B.); the Division of Clinical Medicine I, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy (P.F.); the Department of Medicine and Hepatology, Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens (S.H.); the Digestive Disease Department, Beijing You An Hospital, Beijing (R.J.); the Department of Infectious Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China (Z.-M.L.); Songklanakarin Hospital, Songkla, Thailand (T.P.); Papageorgiou General Hospital, Pathology Clinic, Thessalonika, Greece (G.G.); University of Ankara, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (C.Y.); Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain (M.D.); University of Uludag, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey (S.G.); National Taiwan University Hospital, Internal Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (M.-Y.L.); Roche, Dee Why, Australia (P.B.); and Roche, Welwyn, United Kingdom (N.P.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Marcellin at the Service d'Hépatologie, INSERM Unité 481 and Centre de Recherches Claude Bernard sur les Hépatites Virales, H?pital Beaujon, 92110 Clichy, France, or at patrick.marcellin@bjn.ap-hop-paris.fr.
References
Lai CL, Ratziu V, Yuen MF, Poynard T. Viral hepatitis B. Lancet 2003;362:2089-2094.
Bonino F, Rosina F, Rizzetto M, et al. Chronic hepatitis in HBsAg carriers with serum HBV-DNA and anti-HBe. Gastroenterology 1986;90:1268-1273.
Hadziyannis SJ, Vassilopoulos D. Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2001;34:617-624.
Funk ML, Rosenberg DM, Lok ASF. World-wide epidemiology of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B and associated precore and core promoter variants. J Viral Hepat 2002;9:52-61.
Chu CJ, Keeffe EB, Han SH, et al. Prevalence of HBV precore/core promoter variants in the United States. Hepatology 2003;38:619-628.
EASL International Consensus Conference on Hepatitis B: 13-14 September, 2002 Geneva, Switzerland: consensus statement (long version). J Hepatol 2003;39:Suppl 1:S3-S25.
Manesis EK, Hadziyannis SJ. Interferon treatment and retreatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2001;121:101-109.
Santantonio T, Mazzola M, Iacovazzi T, Miglietta A, Guastadisegni A, Pastore G. Long-term follow-up of patients with anti-HBe/HBV DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B treated for 12 months with lamivudine. J Hepatol 2000;32:300-306.
Tassopoulos NC, Volpes R, Pastore G, et al. Post lamivudine treatment follow up of patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 1999;30:Suppl 1:117-117. abstract.
Oliveri F, Santantonio T, Bellati G, et al. Long term response to therapy of chronic anti-HBe-positive hepatitis B is poor independent of type and schedule of interferon. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1366-1372.
Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update of recommendations. Hepatology 2004;39:857-861.
Lok AS, McMahon BJ. AASLD Practice Guidelines 2003: chronic hepatitis B. (Accessed July 23, 2004, at http://www.aasld.org/netFORUMAASLD/eweb/docs/chronichep_B.pdf.)
Liaw YF, Leung N, Guan R, Lau GKK, Merican I. Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: an update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;18:239-245.
Liaw YF, Chien RN, Yeh CT, Tsai SL, Chu CM. Acute exacerbation and hepatitis B virus clearance after emergence of YMDD motif mutation during lamivudine therapy. Hepatology 1999;30:567-572.
Hadziyannis SJ, Papatheodoridis GV, Dimou E, Laras A, Papaioannou C. Efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2000;32:847-851.
Schalm SW, Heathcote J, Cianciara J, et al. Lamivudine and alpha interferon combination treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: a randomised trial. Gut 2000;46:562-568.
Barbaro G, Zechini F, Pellicelli AM, et al. Long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and lamivudine in combination compared to lamivudine monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B: an Italian multicenter, randomized trial. J Hepatol 2001;35:406-411.
Santantonio T, Niro GA, Sinisi E, et al. Lamivudine/interferon combination therapy in anti-HBe positive chronic hepatitis B patients: a controlled pilot study. J Hepatol 2002;36:799-804.
Bailon P, Palleroni A, Schaffer CA, et al. Rational design of a potent, long-lasting form of interferon: a 40 kDa branched polyethylene glycol-conjugated interferon alpha-2a for the treatment of hepatitis C. Bioconjug Chem 2001;12:195-202.
Perry CM, Jarvis B. Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD): a review of its use in the management of chronic hepatitis C. Drugs 2001;61:2263-2288.
Zeuzem S, Feinman SV, Rasenack J, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1666-1672.
Cooksley WGE, Piratvisuth T, Lee S-D, et al. Peginterferon -2a (40KD): an advance in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat 2003;10:298-305.
Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 1995;22:696-699.
Lok AS, Zoulim F, Locarnini S, et al. Monitoring drug resistance in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients during lamivudine therapy: evaluation of performance of INNO-LiPA HBV DR assay. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:3729-3734.
Hadziyannis SJ, Alexopoulou A, Papakonstantinou A, Petraki K, Manesis E. Interferon treatment with or without oral ganciclovir in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a randomized study. J Viral Hepat 2000;7:235-240.
Martinot-Peignoux M, Boyer N, Colombat M, et al. Serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels and liver histology in inactive HBsAg carriers. J Hepatol 2002;36:543-546.
Nair S, Perrillo RP. Serum alanine aminotransferase flares during interferon treatment in chronic hepatitis B: is sustained clearance of HBV DNA dependent on levels of pretreatment viremia? Hepatology 2001;34:1021-1026.
Papatheodoridis GV, Manesis E, Hadziyannis SJ. The long-term outcome of interferon-alpha treated and untreated patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 2001;34:306-313.
Brunetto MR, Oliveri F, Coco B, et al. Outcome of anti-HBe positive chronic hepatitis B in alpha-interferon treated and untreated patients: a long term cohort study. J Hepatol 2002;36:263-270.
Hadziyannis SJ, Tassopoulos NC, Heathcote EJ, et al. Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2003;348:800-807.
Janssen HLA, Senturk H, Zeuzem S. Peginterferon alfa-2b and lamivudine combination therapy compared with peginterferon alfa-2b for chronic HBeAg-positive hepatitis B: a randomized, controlled trial in 307 patients. Hepatology 2003;38:Suppl 1:246A-246A. abstract.
Richman DD. The impact of drug resistance on the effectiveness of chemotherapy for chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2000;32:866-867.
Lampertico P, Del Ninno E, Vigano M, et al. Long-term suppression of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B by 24-month interferon therapy. Hepatology 2003;37:756-763.
Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347:975-982.
Koskinas J, Merkouraki P, Manesis E, Hadziyannis SJ. Assessment of depression in patients with chronic hepatitis: effect of interferon treatment. Dig Dis 2002;20:284-288.
Forton DM, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thomas HC. Cerebral dysfunction in chronic hepatitis C infection. J Viral Hepat 2003;10:81-86.(Patrick Marcellin, M.D., )