US universities review subscriptions to journal "package deals" as costs rise
http://www.100md.com
《英国医生杂志》
US university libraries are cancelling "package deal" subscriptions梚n which they buy a "bundle" of academic journals and online journal access from the publisher Elsevier梠n the grounds that they are too expensive.
Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts, recently announced that from 1 January 2004 it was stopping its subscription with Elsevier for a bundled package of journals. Instead, the library will purchase journals on a title by title basis.
The decision followed more than a year of negotiations between Harvard and other members of the Northeast Research Libraries Consortium and Elsevier to agree more flexible licensing terms for subscribing to journals. Elsevier offers its journals in what are termed "big deals"梒ontracts in which libraries pay for a package of journals and online access to a publisher抯 journals for several years, with restrictions on early cancellation. Harvard found that some of the journals in the package were rarely used梞ore than 20% of Elsevier titles were used less than twice a month, and 10% were used less than once a month.
Sidney Verba, director of the University Library at Harvard, said in a letter accompanying the announcement: "Bundling has created an artificial environment that sustains journals that might otherwise not be viable on their own. By cancelling these little-used materials, funds will become available to acquire resources that are in higher demand." He added: "Elsevier is among a handful of journal publishers whose commercial bundling practices are squeezing library budgets. Their licensing programmes require libraries to maintain large, fixed levels of expenditure, without the ability to cancel unneeded subscriptions." He hoped that cancelling the journal package deal would allow the library to regain control of journal subscriptions in a way that responded to the university抯 academic and research needs (see http://hul.harvard.edu/letter040101.html).
Cornell University Library, in Ithaca, New York, decided last month not to renew its subscription with Elsevier for a bundled package of more than 900 journals. Library administrators said that they could no longer justify paying an increasing price each year for Elsevier抯 bundle of journals, when a substantial number of titles in the package of 930 online and print journals were hardly used by staff. They pointed out that, although these titles represented less than 2% of the total number of journals to which Cornell library subscribed, the $1.7m (£0.94m; €1.3m) contract with Elsevier for the bundle amounted to more than a fifth of the library抯 total journal subscription costs. The University Senate wanted the library to work with the faculty to reduce this to 15%.
A third US university桽tanford University in California梚s currently considering a draft resolution on the bundling of journals and is expected make a decision in February.
Marike Westra, manager of external communications at Elsevier, said: "Some universities are facing severe financial constraints. We are working closely with them to come to satisfactory arrangements. Elsevier provides many options to tailor the content of journal subscriptions, recognising that needs change." She added that despite the recent cases in the United States, "a good deal of contract renewals are going well."
Competing interests: The BMJ Publishing Group is a small to medium sized publisher that profits from the current market but is threatened by the large publishers.(London Susan Mayor)
婵犵數鍎戠徊钘壝洪悩璇茬婵犻潧娲ら閬嶆煕濞戝崬鏋ゆい鈺冨厴閺屾稑鈽夐崡鐐差潾闁哄鏅滃Λ鍐蓟濞戞ǚ鏋庨煫鍥ㄦ尨閸嬫挻绂掔€n亞鍔﹀銈嗗坊閸嬫捇鏌涢悩宕囥€掓俊鍙夊姇閳规垿宕堕埞鐐亙闁诲骸绠嶉崕鍗炍涘☉銏犵劦妞ゆ帒顦悘锔筋殽閻愬樊鍎旀鐐叉喘椤㈡棃宕ㄩ鐐靛搸婵犵數鍋犻幓顏嗗緤閹灐娲箣閻樺吀绗夐梺鎸庣箓閹峰宕甸崼婢棃鏁傜粵瀣妼闂佸摜鍋為幐鎶藉蓟閺囥垹骞㈤柡鍥╁Т婵′粙鏌i姀鈺佺仩缂傚秴锕獮濠囨晸閻樿尙鐤€濡炪倖鎸鹃崑鐔哥閹扮増鈷戦柛锔诲帎閻熸噴娲Χ閸ヮ煈娼熼梺鍐叉惈閹冲氦绻氶梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹烘鍊垫い鏂垮⒔绾惧ジ鏌¢崘銊モ偓绋挎毄濠电姭鎷冮崟鍨杹閻庢鍠栭悥鐓庣暦濮椻偓婵℃瓕顦抽柛鎾村灦缁绘稓鈧稒岣块惌濠偽旈悩鍙夋喐闁轰緡鍣i、鏇㈡晜閽樺鈧稑鈹戦敍鍕粶濠⒀呮櫕缁瑦绻濋崶銊у幐婵犮垼娉涢敃銈夊汲閺囩喐鍙忛柣鐔煎亰濡偓闂佽桨绀佺粔鎾偩濠靛绀冩い顓熷灣閹寸兘姊绘担绛嬪殐闁哥姵鎹囧畷婵婄疀濞戣鲸鏅g紓鍌欑劍宀e潡鍩㈤弮鍫熺厽闁瑰鍎戞笟娑㈡煕閺傚灝鏆i柡宀嬬節瀹曟帒顫濋鐘靛幀缂傚倷鐒﹂〃鍛此囬柆宥呯劦妞ゆ帒鍠氬ḿ鎰磼椤旇偐绠婚柨婵堝仱閺佸啴宕掑鍗炴憢闂佽崵濞€缂傛艾鈻嶉敐鍥╃煋闁割煈鍠撻埀顒佸笒椤繈顢橀悩顐n潔闂備線娼уú銈吤洪妸鈺佺劦妞ゆ帒鍋嗛弨鐗堢箾婢跺娲寸€规洏鍨芥俊鍫曞炊閵娿儺浼曢柣鐔哥矌婢ф鏁Δ鍜冪稏濠㈣埖鍔栭崑锝夋煕閵夘垰顩☉鎾瑰皺缁辨帗娼忛妸褏鐣奸梺褰掝棑婵炩偓闁诡喗绮撻幐濠冨緞婢跺瞼姊炬繝鐢靛仜椤曨厽鎱ㄦィ鍐ㄦ槬闁哄稁鍘奸崹鍌炴煏婵炵偓娅嗛柛瀣ㄥ妼闇夐柨婵嗘噹閺嗙喐淇婇姘卞ⅵ婵﹥妞介、鏇㈡晲閸℃瑦顓婚梻浣虹帛閹碱偆鎹㈠┑瀣祦閻庯綆鍠栫粻锝嗙節婵犲倸顏柟鏋姂濮婃椽骞愭惔锝傛闂佸搫鐗滈崜鐔风暦閻熸壋鍫柛鏇ㄥ弾濞村嫬顪冮妶鍡楃瑐闁绘帪绠撳鎶筋敂閸喓鍘遍梺鐟版惈缁夋潙鐣甸崱娑欑厓鐟滄粓宕滃顒夋僵闁靛ň鏅滈崑鍌炴煥閻斿搫孝閻熸瑱绠撻獮鏍箹椤撶偟浠紓浣插亾濠㈣泛鈯曡ぐ鎺戠闁稿繗鍋愬▓銈夋⒑缂佹ḿ绠栭柣鈺婂灠閻g兘鏁撻悩鑼槰闂佽偐鈷堥崜姘额敊閹达附鈷戦悹鍥b偓铏亖闂佸憡鏌ㄦ鎼佸煝閹捐绠i柣鎰綑椤庢挸鈹戦悩璇у伐闁哥噥鍨堕獮鍡涘磼濮n厼缍婇幃鈺呭箵閹烘繂濡锋繝鐢靛Л閸嬫捇鏌熷▓鍨灓缁鹃箖绠栭弻鐔衡偓鐢登瑰暩閻熸粎澧楅悡锟犲蓟濞戙垹绠抽柡鍌氱氨閺嬪懎鈹戦悙鍙夊櫣闂佸府绲炬穱濠囧箻椤旇姤娅㈤梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts, recently announced that from 1 January 2004 it was stopping its subscription with Elsevier for a bundled package of journals. Instead, the library will purchase journals on a title by title basis.
The decision followed more than a year of negotiations between Harvard and other members of the Northeast Research Libraries Consortium and Elsevier to agree more flexible licensing terms for subscribing to journals. Elsevier offers its journals in what are termed "big deals"梒ontracts in which libraries pay for a package of journals and online access to a publisher抯 journals for several years, with restrictions on early cancellation. Harvard found that some of the journals in the package were rarely used梞ore than 20% of Elsevier titles were used less than twice a month, and 10% were used less than once a month.
Sidney Verba, director of the University Library at Harvard, said in a letter accompanying the announcement: "Bundling has created an artificial environment that sustains journals that might otherwise not be viable on their own. By cancelling these little-used materials, funds will become available to acquire resources that are in higher demand." He added: "Elsevier is among a handful of journal publishers whose commercial bundling practices are squeezing library budgets. Their licensing programmes require libraries to maintain large, fixed levels of expenditure, without the ability to cancel unneeded subscriptions." He hoped that cancelling the journal package deal would allow the library to regain control of journal subscriptions in a way that responded to the university抯 academic and research needs (see http://hul.harvard.edu/letter040101.html).
Cornell University Library, in Ithaca, New York, decided last month not to renew its subscription with Elsevier for a bundled package of more than 900 journals. Library administrators said that they could no longer justify paying an increasing price each year for Elsevier抯 bundle of journals, when a substantial number of titles in the package of 930 online and print journals were hardly used by staff. They pointed out that, although these titles represented less than 2% of the total number of journals to which Cornell library subscribed, the $1.7m (£0.94m; €1.3m) contract with Elsevier for the bundle amounted to more than a fifth of the library抯 total journal subscription costs. The University Senate wanted the library to work with the faculty to reduce this to 15%.
A third US university桽tanford University in California梚s currently considering a draft resolution on the bundling of journals and is expected make a decision in February.
Marike Westra, manager of external communications at Elsevier, said: "Some universities are facing severe financial constraints. We are working closely with them to come to satisfactory arrangements. Elsevier provides many options to tailor the content of journal subscriptions, recognising that needs change." She added that despite the recent cases in the United States, "a good deal of contract renewals are going well."
Competing interests: The BMJ Publishing Group is a small to medium sized publisher that profits from the current market but is threatened by the large publishers.(London Susan Mayor)