The paralyse (par) mouse neurological mutation maps to a 9 Mbp (4 cM) interval of mouse chromosome 18
http://www.100md.com
《遗传学和分子生物学》
IUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, ICB, Laboratorio de Genetica Animal e Humana, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
IIInstitut Pasteur, Unite de Genetique des Mammiferes, Paris, France
ABSTRACT
The Paralyse mutation is a spontaneous neuromuscular mutation, first observed in 1980 at the Pasteur Institute, which is transmitted by the autosomal recessive par allele. Affected homozygote par/par mice rarely survive beyond 16 days of age and at the end of their life they are emaciated and completely paralyzed. Several concordant histological and physiological observations indicate that mutant mice might be good models for studying early-onset human motor neuron diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy. Linkage analysis using a set of molecular markers and two F2 crosses indicate that the mutation maps to mouse chromosome 18 in a region spanning 4 cM (or 9 megabase pairs, Mbp) between the microsatellites D18Mit140 and D18Mit33. These results positioned the par locus in a region homologous to human chromosome 18p11.22 to 18q21.32.
Key words: mouse model, neuromuscular disease, mouse genetic map, Paralyse mutation.
Introduction
The spontaneous neuromuscular mutation Paralyse was discovered in mice at the Pasteur Institute in the early 1980's. The disease is transmitted by an autosomal recessive allele (symbol par) and the mutation is kept segregating in a moderately inbred mouse strain (PAR/Pas) by repeated brother to sister mating of affected mice (genotypes +/par).
Investigations on the paralyse mutation have so far been limited to physiology and histopathology. Henderson et al. (1986) reported that extracts of par/par mutant muscles exhibited a neuritis-promoting activity 10-fold higher than extracts prepared from control litter-mates. Blondet et al. (1989) noted that although the number of muscle fibers and the distribution of acetylcholine receptors in par/par mice was normal the diameter of muscle fibers was distributed uni-modally and muscle choline acetyltransferase activity was reduced compared with that of control muscles, indicating that synaptic terminal development might be impaired. Optical and electron microscopy indicated that polyneuronal innervation was retained in the endplates of mutant mice, indicating that the normal process of regression of redundant innervation did not occur. Intramuscular axons failed to become myelinated in mutant animals but sciatic nerve axons were myelinated and had a normal myelin thickness/axon diameter ratio. Blondet et al. (1989) concluded that the major pathological feature of the paralyse mutant phenotype was an arrest in development of both nerve and muscle during the first week of ab utero life.
Morphometric measurements performed by Blondet et al. (1989) on lumbar spinal motor neurons of 8 and 14-day old par/par and normal control mice indicated that while there was no significant difference in the number of motor neurons between 8-day old par/par and control mice there was a significant decrease (30 to 35%) in the number of motor neurons in 14-day old par/par mice as compared to control mice and that the motor neurons of the par/par mutants were significantly smaller than those of control mice at both 8 and 14 days. These results lead Blondet et al. (1989) to hypothesize that the paralyse mutation involved atrophy and subsequent death of anterior horn motor neurons and that the rapid progression and the severity of the disease would make paralyse mice good models for studying early-onset human motor neuron diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy, these assumptions being confirmed by subsequent work (Houenou et al., 1996, Blondet et al., 1997). A more recent investigation (Pieri et al., 2001) concerning the small heat shock protein Hsp25 and its expression levels in the motor neuron of the ventral horn of the spinal cord in par/par and control mice indicates that this molecule is expressed at a much lower level in par/par mutants as compared normal control mice.
Despite all this research the molecular mechanisms responsible for motor neuron death in par/par mutant mice are still unknown, but the technique of positional cloning used in modern mouse genetics offers a relatively straightforward approach by which such mechanisms could be elucidated. The aim of the study reported in this paper was to proceed with the first obligatory step in this direction by attempting to localize the paralyse locus within the smallest possible chromosomal segment of the mouse genetic map. This localization would also help in the recognition of the orthologous regions in the human genome and possibly indicate potential candidates for genes acting in the human disease.
Material and Methods
Mice and crosses
Three strains of mice were used for the mapping of the paralyse gene: PAR/Pas (symbol P), the sub-strain where the mutation segregates. This strain is moderately inbred and is closely related to, but not identical with, strain C57BL/6 due to some contamination from strains 129/Sv and C3H/Pas that possibly occurred during the first generations; PWK/Pas (symbol K), a highly inbred strain (F75) established from wild Mus musculus musculus progenitors trapped in the Czech Republic (Bonhomme and Guenet 1996). This strain is used in our laboratory as a ready-made source of genetic polymorphisms for the purpose of gene cartography; and C57BL/6Cs.18SEG (symbol S), a strain consomic of strain C57BL/6 for a complete chromosome 18 originating from the species Mus spretus (strain SEG/Pas). Mice homozygous for the introgressed chromosome 18 are sterile when homozygous 18SEG/18SEG but in this experiment, we used heterozygous males and selected the appropriate progenitors by genotyping with microsatellite markers specific for chromosome 18. Maintenance and care of the three strains of mice used in this study were in accordance with the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines for the use of laboratory animals.
The genetic localization of the paralyse gene was achieved in two successive steps, the first being a cross between C57BL/6-par/+ and PWK/Pas mice to rapidly obtain a chromosomal assignment for the par/par mutation and the second step a cross between C57BL/6-par/+ mice and the consomic strain C57BL/6Cs.18SEG to produce a high resolution map of the critical region. Strain SEG/Pas is very different from both strains C57BL/6 and PWK/Pas and we knew that virtually any molecular markers in the interval would be polymorphic with one or other of these strains. Both crosses were inter-crosses which produced second filial generation (F2) offspring, this type of cross (when possible) having the advantage of doubling the number of meiosis which can be scored for any given sample size. We did not use the normal F2 offspring for the first mapping experiment because their genotype at the par locus was ambiguous (+/+ or +/par) but all mutant offspring were pooled irrespective of their origin. A piece of tail was clipped from all the mice (24 par/par mutants and the 52 +/par non-mutants) and processed to produce good-quality DNA samples. The 24 DNA samples of the mutant offspring were genotyped using 53 single-sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) microsatellite markers which were evenly-distributed over all the 19 autosomic chromosomes.
Once the par locus was unambiguously localized on the mouse genetic map, the 52 non- mutant mice were genotyped with specific markers for chromosome 18. Some mice that were found with recombinant haplotypes in the interval known to harbor the par gene were test-bred with +/par heterozygous mice to reveal whether they were +/+ or +/par at the par locus, at least two progenies being bred (producing in all cases more than 10 offspring) to rule out the possibility that mutant mice were not detected because of a chance effect.
Genotyping with SSLP markers
Genomic DNA was extracted and purified by using the phenol/chloroform method. The 53 primer pairs used in this experiment were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL, USA) and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions for amplification of genomic DNA were: 94 °C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 50 °C for 40 s and 72 °C for 40 s and then 72 °C for 3 min with a final hold at room temperature (21-25 °C). The PCR products were resolved and the by electrophoresis on 3% (w/v) agarose (NuSieve; FCM company, USA), stained with ethidium bromide and analyzed and photographed under UV illumination. The SSLP (microsatellite) polymorphisms were scored using the same electrophoresis technique.
The genotypes of the progeny were scored as P-homozygous when there was only one band characteristic of the marker allele derived from strain PAR/Pas, as K-homozygous when the PWK allele was present, as S-homozygous when the SEG allele was detected or as heterozygous (H) when two bands (i.e. both parental alleles) were present. Linkage analysis was performed manually, by looking for divergence from the expected Mendelian proportions. Haplotypes analysis was achieved after ordering and spacing the SSLP markers according to reference database (http://www.informatics.jax.org).
Results and Discussion
At birth, par/par homozygotes are indistinguishable from their normal litter-mates (+/par or +/+) but from about day 8 growth is impaired and the animals develop progressive generalized muscle wasting (Figure 1). By day 10 mutant mice exhibit uncoordinated limb-movements and loose the righting reflex (i.e. they cannot right themselves when placed on their backs) (Blondet et al., 1989). Homozygotes mice rarely survive beyond 16 days of age and at the end of their life are emaciated and completely paralyzed (Duchen et al., 1983). We found, at birth, 24 mutant and 52 normal mice in the merged progenies of the two F2 sets, which means that par/par homozygotes accounted for roughly 25% (24/76) of the expected offspring in the population studied and that par/par homozygote mortality occurs in a relatively short period of time and only ab utero. It also indicates that all homozygotes die and that the other aspects of the genetic background of the mice has no, or very little, influence on the severity of the paralyse condition in the phenotype (Duchen et al., 1983). Early death is a feature of the mutant pathology which needs to be borne in mind when considering candidate genes for the par mutation and should coincide with the onset and transcription pattern of the candidate genes.
Our results concerning the genotyping of the mutant and wild-type mice and our deductions in regard to chromosomal assignment for the par locus are presented in Figures 2 and 3.
In our sample of 24 mutant progeny we found a strong deviation from the expected 1:2:1 Mendelian ratio for the SSLP markers (D18Mit140, D18Mit107 and D18Mit50), suggesting linkage to Chr 18. We controlled for this by performing complementary genotyping with two other markers (D18Mit152 and D18Mit182) and confirmed the assignment of par to chromosome 18. When we considered the haplotypes of affected mice one mouse (indicated by '[' in the last row of Figure 2) allowed us to define the centromeric edge of the critical interval containing the par mutation because this mouse was heterozygous (P/K) for the D18Mit122 marker but homozygous (P/P) for the D18Mit140 marker, indicating that the edge of the par region lies somewhere between D18Mit122 and D18Mit140. In addition to this the haplotypes of three mice (indicated by a 't' in the last row of Figure 2) allowed us to define the distal border of the par-containing interval as being localized between markers D18Mit50 and D18Mit185.
Analysis of the haplotypes of the 52 unaffected mice confirmed the localization of the centromeric limit of the region harboring the paralyse locus because unaffected mouse K (indicated by 'v' in the last row of Figure 3) was found to be homozygous for the P (PAR/Pas) allelic form at loci D18Mit123, D18Mit122 and D18Mit140 and heterozygous for all other telomeric markers. This group of mice allowed us to refine the location of the distal border of the par-containing interval because one of the 5 mice (unaffected an with a I type haplotype, indicated by 'U' in the last row of Figure 2) was heterozygous for par (+/par) when test-bred with a +/par partner.
Merging all these data indicates that the par locus lies within an interval flanked by microsatellite markers D18Mit140 and D18Mit33. On checking the mouse genome sequence database Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org/Musmusculus/) with these entries we found that this segment spans 9 megabase pairs (Mbp) of mouse chromosome 18 in a region which is homologous with rat chromosome 18 and human chromosome 18p11.22 to 18q21.32. We cannot point to any front-line positional candidate gene for the paralyse pathology because although the human genome is completely sequenced in the 18p11.22 to 18q21.32 region this region contains some 68 genes, most of which are new. As a functional candidate we might a priori retain the orthologous gene responsible for the human mutation ALS3 (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 3) (MIM # 606640), which maps to human chromosome 18q21 and also results in progressive muscle weakness with motor neuron degeneration (Hand et al., 2002). However, in contrast with the paralyse mutation, ALS3 is inherited as an autosomal dominant allele. Another possible candidate might be the Afg3l2 gene, a member of the family of genes encoding ATPase-like proteins, whose human othologue has been found to be involved in hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP) (Casari G and Rugarli E, 2001).
Considering these mapping data it is important to note that none of the genes encoding Hsp25-like proteins (Hspb1, Hspb7) map to the critical interval where we found par to map, indicating that the decrease in Hsp25 expression levels in the motor neuron of the spinal cord, reported by Pieri and coworkers (Pieri et al., 2001), is not a direct consequence of an alteration in the gene itself but rather is a secondary consequence of the paralyse gene mutation. Experiments are in progress to reduce further the critical interval for paralyse.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Brazilian agency Fundao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and by the Pasteur Institute, France.
References
Bonhomme F and Guenet JL (1996) The laboratory mouse and its wild relatives. In: Rastan S, Lyon MF and Searle AG (eds) Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1577-1596.
Blondet B, Duxson MJ, Harris AJ, Melki J, Guenet JL, Pinon-Raymond M and Rieger F (1989) Nerve and muscle development in paralyse mutant mice. Dev Biol 132:153-166.
Blondet B, Murawsky M, Houenou LJ, Ait-Ikhlef A, Yan Q and Rieger F (1997) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor fails to arrest neuromuscular disorders in the paralyse mouse mutant, a model of motoneuron disease. J Neurol Sci 153:20-24.
Casari G and Rugarli E (2001) Molecular basis of inherited spastic paraplegias. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11:336-342.
Duchen LW, Gomez S, Guenet JL and Love S (1983) Paralyse: A new neurological mutant mouse with progressive atrophy and loss of motor nerve terminals. J Physiol 345:166.
Hand CK, Khoris J, Salachas F, Gros-Louis F, Lopes AA, Mayeux-Portas V, Brewer CG, Brown Jr RH, Meininger V, Camu W and Rouleau GA (2002) A novel locus for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, on chromosome 18q. Am J Hum Genet 70:251-256.
Henderson CE, Benoit P, Huchet M, Guenet JL and Changeux JP (1986) Increase of neurite-promoting activity for spinal neurons in muscles of Paralyse mice and tenotomised rats. Dev Brain Res 25:65-70.
Houenou LJ, Blondet B, Li L, Murawsky M, Oppenheim RW and Rieger F (1996) The Paralyse mouse mutant: A new animal model of anterior horn motor neuron degeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 55:698-703.
Pieri I, Cifuentes-Diaz C, Oudinet JP, Blondet B, Rieger F, Gonin S, Arrigo AP and Thomas Y (2001) Modulation of HSP25 expression during anterior horn motor neuron degeneration in the paralyse mouse mutant. J Neurosci Res 65:247-253.(Lino Silva Neto; Asadolla)
IIInstitut Pasteur, Unite de Genetique des Mammiferes, Paris, France
ABSTRACT
The Paralyse mutation is a spontaneous neuromuscular mutation, first observed in 1980 at the Pasteur Institute, which is transmitted by the autosomal recessive par allele. Affected homozygote par/par mice rarely survive beyond 16 days of age and at the end of their life they are emaciated and completely paralyzed. Several concordant histological and physiological observations indicate that mutant mice might be good models for studying early-onset human motor neuron diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy. Linkage analysis using a set of molecular markers and two F2 crosses indicate that the mutation maps to mouse chromosome 18 in a region spanning 4 cM (or 9 megabase pairs, Mbp) between the microsatellites D18Mit140 and D18Mit33. These results positioned the par locus in a region homologous to human chromosome 18p11.22 to 18q21.32.
Key words: mouse model, neuromuscular disease, mouse genetic map, Paralyse mutation.
Introduction
The spontaneous neuromuscular mutation Paralyse was discovered in mice at the Pasteur Institute in the early 1980's. The disease is transmitted by an autosomal recessive allele (symbol par) and the mutation is kept segregating in a moderately inbred mouse strain (PAR/Pas) by repeated brother to sister mating of affected mice (genotypes +/par).
Investigations on the paralyse mutation have so far been limited to physiology and histopathology. Henderson et al. (1986) reported that extracts of par/par mutant muscles exhibited a neuritis-promoting activity 10-fold higher than extracts prepared from control litter-mates. Blondet et al. (1989) noted that although the number of muscle fibers and the distribution of acetylcholine receptors in par/par mice was normal the diameter of muscle fibers was distributed uni-modally and muscle choline acetyltransferase activity was reduced compared with that of control muscles, indicating that synaptic terminal development might be impaired. Optical and electron microscopy indicated that polyneuronal innervation was retained in the endplates of mutant mice, indicating that the normal process of regression of redundant innervation did not occur. Intramuscular axons failed to become myelinated in mutant animals but sciatic nerve axons were myelinated and had a normal myelin thickness/axon diameter ratio. Blondet et al. (1989) concluded that the major pathological feature of the paralyse mutant phenotype was an arrest in development of both nerve and muscle during the first week of ab utero life.
Morphometric measurements performed by Blondet et al. (1989) on lumbar spinal motor neurons of 8 and 14-day old par/par and normal control mice indicated that while there was no significant difference in the number of motor neurons between 8-day old par/par and control mice there was a significant decrease (30 to 35%) in the number of motor neurons in 14-day old par/par mice as compared to control mice and that the motor neurons of the par/par mutants were significantly smaller than those of control mice at both 8 and 14 days. These results lead Blondet et al. (1989) to hypothesize that the paralyse mutation involved atrophy and subsequent death of anterior horn motor neurons and that the rapid progression and the severity of the disease would make paralyse mice good models for studying early-onset human motor neuron diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy, these assumptions being confirmed by subsequent work (Houenou et al., 1996, Blondet et al., 1997). A more recent investigation (Pieri et al., 2001) concerning the small heat shock protein Hsp25 and its expression levels in the motor neuron of the ventral horn of the spinal cord in par/par and control mice indicates that this molecule is expressed at a much lower level in par/par mutants as compared normal control mice.
Despite all this research the molecular mechanisms responsible for motor neuron death in par/par mutant mice are still unknown, but the technique of positional cloning used in modern mouse genetics offers a relatively straightforward approach by which such mechanisms could be elucidated. The aim of the study reported in this paper was to proceed with the first obligatory step in this direction by attempting to localize the paralyse locus within the smallest possible chromosomal segment of the mouse genetic map. This localization would also help in the recognition of the orthologous regions in the human genome and possibly indicate potential candidates for genes acting in the human disease.
Material and Methods
Mice and crosses
Three strains of mice were used for the mapping of the paralyse gene: PAR/Pas (symbol P), the sub-strain where the mutation segregates. This strain is moderately inbred and is closely related to, but not identical with, strain C57BL/6 due to some contamination from strains 129/Sv and C3H/Pas that possibly occurred during the first generations; PWK/Pas (symbol K), a highly inbred strain (F75) established from wild Mus musculus musculus progenitors trapped in the Czech Republic (Bonhomme and Guenet 1996). This strain is used in our laboratory as a ready-made source of genetic polymorphisms for the purpose of gene cartography; and C57BL/6Cs.18SEG (symbol S), a strain consomic of strain C57BL/6 for a complete chromosome 18 originating from the species Mus spretus (strain SEG/Pas). Mice homozygous for the introgressed chromosome 18 are sterile when homozygous 18SEG/18SEG but in this experiment, we used heterozygous males and selected the appropriate progenitors by genotyping with microsatellite markers specific for chromosome 18. Maintenance and care of the three strains of mice used in this study were in accordance with the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines for the use of laboratory animals.
The genetic localization of the paralyse gene was achieved in two successive steps, the first being a cross between C57BL/6-par/+ and PWK/Pas mice to rapidly obtain a chromosomal assignment for the par/par mutation and the second step a cross between C57BL/6-par/+ mice and the consomic strain C57BL/6Cs.18SEG to produce a high resolution map of the critical region. Strain SEG/Pas is very different from both strains C57BL/6 and PWK/Pas and we knew that virtually any molecular markers in the interval would be polymorphic with one or other of these strains. Both crosses were inter-crosses which produced second filial generation (F2) offspring, this type of cross (when possible) having the advantage of doubling the number of meiosis which can be scored for any given sample size. We did not use the normal F2 offspring for the first mapping experiment because their genotype at the par locus was ambiguous (+/+ or +/par) but all mutant offspring were pooled irrespective of their origin. A piece of tail was clipped from all the mice (24 par/par mutants and the 52 +/par non-mutants) and processed to produce good-quality DNA samples. The 24 DNA samples of the mutant offspring were genotyped using 53 single-sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) microsatellite markers which were evenly-distributed over all the 19 autosomic chromosomes.
Once the par locus was unambiguously localized on the mouse genetic map, the 52 non- mutant mice were genotyped with specific markers for chromosome 18. Some mice that were found with recombinant haplotypes in the interval known to harbor the par gene were test-bred with +/par heterozygous mice to reveal whether they were +/+ or +/par at the par locus, at least two progenies being bred (producing in all cases more than 10 offspring) to rule out the possibility that mutant mice were not detected because of a chance effect.
Genotyping with SSLP markers
Genomic DNA was extracted and purified by using the phenol/chloroform method. The 53 primer pairs used in this experiment were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL, USA) and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions for amplification of genomic DNA were: 94 °C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 50 °C for 40 s and 72 °C for 40 s and then 72 °C for 3 min with a final hold at room temperature (21-25 °C). The PCR products were resolved and the by electrophoresis on 3% (w/v) agarose (NuSieve; FCM company, USA), stained with ethidium bromide and analyzed and photographed under UV illumination. The SSLP (microsatellite) polymorphisms were scored using the same electrophoresis technique.
The genotypes of the progeny were scored as P-homozygous when there was only one band characteristic of the marker allele derived from strain PAR/Pas, as K-homozygous when the PWK allele was present, as S-homozygous when the SEG allele was detected or as heterozygous (H) when two bands (i.e. both parental alleles) were present. Linkage analysis was performed manually, by looking for divergence from the expected Mendelian proportions. Haplotypes analysis was achieved after ordering and spacing the SSLP markers according to reference database (http://www.informatics.jax.org).
Results and Discussion
At birth, par/par homozygotes are indistinguishable from their normal litter-mates (+/par or +/+) but from about day 8 growth is impaired and the animals develop progressive generalized muscle wasting (Figure 1). By day 10 mutant mice exhibit uncoordinated limb-movements and loose the righting reflex (i.e. they cannot right themselves when placed on their backs) (Blondet et al., 1989). Homozygotes mice rarely survive beyond 16 days of age and at the end of their life are emaciated and completely paralyzed (Duchen et al., 1983). We found, at birth, 24 mutant and 52 normal mice in the merged progenies of the two F2 sets, which means that par/par homozygotes accounted for roughly 25% (24/76) of the expected offspring in the population studied and that par/par homozygote mortality occurs in a relatively short period of time and only ab utero. It also indicates that all homozygotes die and that the other aspects of the genetic background of the mice has no, or very little, influence on the severity of the paralyse condition in the phenotype (Duchen et al., 1983). Early death is a feature of the mutant pathology which needs to be borne in mind when considering candidate genes for the par mutation and should coincide with the onset and transcription pattern of the candidate genes.
Our results concerning the genotyping of the mutant and wild-type mice and our deductions in regard to chromosomal assignment for the par locus are presented in Figures 2 and 3.
In our sample of 24 mutant progeny we found a strong deviation from the expected 1:2:1 Mendelian ratio for the SSLP markers (D18Mit140, D18Mit107 and D18Mit50), suggesting linkage to Chr 18. We controlled for this by performing complementary genotyping with two other markers (D18Mit152 and D18Mit182) and confirmed the assignment of par to chromosome 18. When we considered the haplotypes of affected mice one mouse (indicated by '[' in the last row of Figure 2) allowed us to define the centromeric edge of the critical interval containing the par mutation because this mouse was heterozygous (P/K) for the D18Mit122 marker but homozygous (P/P) for the D18Mit140 marker, indicating that the edge of the par region lies somewhere between D18Mit122 and D18Mit140. In addition to this the haplotypes of three mice (indicated by a 't' in the last row of Figure 2) allowed us to define the distal border of the par-containing interval as being localized between markers D18Mit50 and D18Mit185.
Analysis of the haplotypes of the 52 unaffected mice confirmed the localization of the centromeric limit of the region harboring the paralyse locus because unaffected mouse K (indicated by 'v' in the last row of Figure 3) was found to be homozygous for the P (PAR/Pas) allelic form at loci D18Mit123, D18Mit122 and D18Mit140 and heterozygous for all other telomeric markers. This group of mice allowed us to refine the location of the distal border of the par-containing interval because one of the 5 mice (unaffected an with a I type haplotype, indicated by 'U' in the last row of Figure 2) was heterozygous for par (+/par) when test-bred with a +/par partner.
Merging all these data indicates that the par locus lies within an interval flanked by microsatellite markers D18Mit140 and D18Mit33. On checking the mouse genome sequence database Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org/Musmusculus/) with these entries we found that this segment spans 9 megabase pairs (Mbp) of mouse chromosome 18 in a region which is homologous with rat chromosome 18 and human chromosome 18p11.22 to 18q21.32. We cannot point to any front-line positional candidate gene for the paralyse pathology because although the human genome is completely sequenced in the 18p11.22 to 18q21.32 region this region contains some 68 genes, most of which are new. As a functional candidate we might a priori retain the orthologous gene responsible for the human mutation ALS3 (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 3) (MIM # 606640), which maps to human chromosome 18q21 and also results in progressive muscle weakness with motor neuron degeneration (Hand et al., 2002). However, in contrast with the paralyse mutation, ALS3 is inherited as an autosomal dominant allele. Another possible candidate might be the Afg3l2 gene, a member of the family of genes encoding ATPase-like proteins, whose human othologue has been found to be involved in hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP) (Casari G and Rugarli E, 2001).
Considering these mapping data it is important to note that none of the genes encoding Hsp25-like proteins (Hspb1, Hspb7) map to the critical interval where we found par to map, indicating that the decrease in Hsp25 expression levels in the motor neuron of the spinal cord, reported by Pieri and coworkers (Pieri et al., 2001), is not a direct consequence of an alteration in the gene itself but rather is a secondary consequence of the paralyse gene mutation. Experiments are in progress to reduce further the critical interval for paralyse.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Brazilian agency Fundao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and by the Pasteur Institute, France.
References
Bonhomme F and Guenet JL (1996) The laboratory mouse and its wild relatives. In: Rastan S, Lyon MF and Searle AG (eds) Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1577-1596.
Blondet B, Duxson MJ, Harris AJ, Melki J, Guenet JL, Pinon-Raymond M and Rieger F (1989) Nerve and muscle development in paralyse mutant mice. Dev Biol 132:153-166.
Blondet B, Murawsky M, Houenou LJ, Ait-Ikhlef A, Yan Q and Rieger F (1997) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor fails to arrest neuromuscular disorders in the paralyse mouse mutant, a model of motoneuron disease. J Neurol Sci 153:20-24.
Casari G and Rugarli E (2001) Molecular basis of inherited spastic paraplegias. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11:336-342.
Duchen LW, Gomez S, Guenet JL and Love S (1983) Paralyse: A new neurological mutant mouse with progressive atrophy and loss of motor nerve terminals. J Physiol 345:166.
Hand CK, Khoris J, Salachas F, Gros-Louis F, Lopes AA, Mayeux-Portas V, Brewer CG, Brown Jr RH, Meininger V, Camu W and Rouleau GA (2002) A novel locus for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, on chromosome 18q. Am J Hum Genet 70:251-256.
Henderson CE, Benoit P, Huchet M, Guenet JL and Changeux JP (1986) Increase of neurite-promoting activity for spinal neurons in muscles of Paralyse mice and tenotomised rats. Dev Brain Res 25:65-70.
Houenou LJ, Blondet B, Li L, Murawsky M, Oppenheim RW and Rieger F (1996) The Paralyse mouse mutant: A new animal model of anterior horn motor neuron degeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 55:698-703.
Pieri I, Cifuentes-Diaz C, Oudinet JP, Blondet B, Rieger F, Gonin S, Arrigo AP and Thomas Y (2001) Modulation of HSP25 expression during anterior horn motor neuron degeneration in the paralyse mouse mutant. J Neurosci Res 65:247-253.(Lino Silva Neto; Asadolla)