当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《血管的通路杂志》 > 2006年第6期 > 正文
编号:11353738
Is short-term anticoagulation necessary after mitral valve repair
http://www.100md.com 《血管的通路杂志》
     a Wessex Cardiothoracic Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK

    b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK

    Abstract

    A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether oral anticoagulants are necessary after mitral valve repair. The reported search found 127 papers of which 12 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group, relevant outcomes and weaknesses were tabulated. We conclude that the current European Society of Cardiology guidelines support the use of warfarin for 3 months post-mitral repair, citing an absence of studies supporting the safety of omitting warfarin. They acknowledge that this is based on expert consensus and that many surgeons do not follow this guideline. No other guidelines provide recommendations in this area. The longest follow-up studies of patients post-mitral repair report excellent results using short term warfarin, and they also show that a third of patients discharged in sinus rhythm will have an episode of atrial fibrillation shortly after. In addition, the highest risk of thromboembolism occurs in the early months post surgery. Therefore, until studies demonstrate the safety of omitting warfarin for patients undergoing mitral valve repair, 3 months of anticoagulation should remain the standard of care.

    Key Words: Thoracic surgery; Anticoagulation; Mitral valve repair; Warfarin

    1. Introduction

    A best evidence topic was constructed according to the structured protocol. This protocol is fully described in the ICVTS [1].

    2. Clinical scenario

    You are looking after a 55-year-old man with mitral regurgitation who underwent a mitral valve repair with a quadrangular P2 resection and an annuloplasty ring. He is in sinus rhythm and well. You had talked to him about warfarin in the context of a mitral replacement in case you could not repair the valve. However, he is now keen to eliminate any additional risk of stroke as his mother had a severe stroke 5 years ago. He says that he would like to take warfarin if there was any additional chance of preventing a stroke. You decide to review the literature to answer his question.

    3. Three-part question

    In patients who have undergone [mitral valve repair] does [warfarin] have any benefit in terms of [survival or reducing thromboembolic complications]

    4. Search strategy

    Medline1966 to July 2006, Embase 1980 to July 2006 using the OVID interface. [mitral valve repair.mp OR mitral repair.mp OR annuloplasty.mp OR mitral ring.mp] AND [exp warfarin/OR warfarin.mp OR exp.anticoagulants/OR anticoagulation.mp OR exp coumarins/OR coumarin.mp].

    This search was repeated in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. The American College of Cardiology, AHA/ACCP, NICE, SIGN, European Society of Cardiology and the British Society for Haematology guidelines were also hand searched.

    5. Search outcome

    The search identified 63 papers on Medline and 64 papers on Embase in addition to the hand searched guidelines. Twelve papers gave the best evidence on this topic (Table 1).

    6. Comments

    The ACC/AHA 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease do not provide recommendations for patients who have undergone a mitral valve repair [2,3] and neither do the ACCP guidelines of 2004 [4]. The European Society of Cardiology do provide guidelines for these patients, stating that there are no randomized controlled trials to support the safety of omitting warfarin after mitral repair. They recommend 3 months of warfarin at a target INR of 2.5 or 3.0 if there are additional risk factors. They acknowledge that this is based on expert consensus and acknowledge that many surgeons do not follow this guideline.

    Vaughan et al. [5] in a survey of UK surgeons found that 64% of consultants used warfarin post-mitral repair, thus demonstrating that there is much variation in the anticoagulation management of patients post-mitral repair in the UK.

    Of the large series of patients with mitral valve repair, Carpentier et al. [6,7] have provided the longest follow up. They reported their long-term results of 928 patients with rheumatic regurgitation and 162 patients with non-rheumatic regurgitation, with a follow up of up to 29 years. This group used 2 months of warfarin for all patients, and only 3 patients had a stroke in the first 3 months. There were 37 thromboembolic events in these patients and there was a very high association with atrial fibrillation.

    Jovin et al. [8] reviewed 245 patients who underwent mitral repair. One hundred and eighty-one patients were discharged in sinus rhythm; 64 (36%) of these had an episode of atrial fibrillation (AF) during the postoperative period. Of the 180 patients who were in sinus rhythm at discharge, 98 (54%) were discharged on warfarin, 78 (43%) were discharged on aspirin and 3 (2%) received no anticoagulation or antithrombotic therapy at discharge. The authors recommended oral anticoagulation for 3 months, until the endothelialisation of the newly implanted prosthesis and suture material takes place.

    Aramendi et al. [9] reported on the thromboembolic risk of 235 patients having replacements or repairs from 1990–1995. In total, six episodes of thrombo-embolism were reported. All occurred in the first postoperative year, four reported during the first three months follow up. Two patients were on ticlopidine and four episodes were in patients having warfarin. The risk of thromboembolism in the first three months of follow up analysed by hazard function showed the highest risk in the first month, but this rapidly declined thereafter.

    Galloway et al. [10] reported on 148 patients after mitral valve reconstruction surgery. All patients were started on warfarin on the third postoperative day for 3 months. Six late thromboembolic complications were reported in five patients. Two patients were on warfarin during the event at 2.5 months and 13.2 months post surgery. Four episodes occurred when the patient was on aspirin at 1, 6.5, 15.6 and 16.3 months post surgery. One patient died from a stroke. Total freedom from late thromboemboli was 97.6% at 1 year and remained at 95.2% for years 2–7.

    Deloche et al. [5] followed up 195 patients who underwent mitral repair. All patients were started on warfarin on the third postoperative day and discontinued after 3 months. Ten patients had a thromboembolic event, for an actuarial rate of 94% patients free of thromboembolism at 15 years (linearised rate of 0.4%/patient-year). Of the ten thromboembolic events, seven were TIAs without major sequelae, two patients had permanent deficit and one patient died. Eighty-eight patients remained on long-term anticoagulation because of AF. There were six reported haemorrhagic complications, for an actuarial rate of 95.6±1.97% patients free of anticoagulation related haemorrhage at 15 years for the total series and 91% for the 88 patients receiving anticoagulation.

    7. Clinical bottom line

    The current European Society of Cardiology guidelines support the use of warfarin for 3 months post-mitral repair, citing an absence of studies supporting the safety of omitting warfarin. They acknowledge that this is based on expert consensus and that many surgeons do not follow this guideline. The longest follow-up studies of patients post-mitral repair report excellent results using short term warfarin, and they also show that a third of patients discharged in sinus rhythm will have an episode of atrial fibrillation shortly after. In addition, the highest risk of thromboembolism occurs in the early months post surgery. Therefore, until studies demonstrate the safety of omitting warfarin for patients undergoing mitral valve repair 3 months of anticoagulation should remain the standard of care.

    References

    Dunning J, Prendergast B, kway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2003; 2:405–409.

    Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC, Edmunds LH Jr, Fedderly BJ, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, McKay CR, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Rahimtoola SH, Ritchie JL, Cheitlin MD, Eagle KA, Gardner TJ, Garson A Jr, Gibbons RJ, Russell RO, Ryan TJ, Smith SC Jr. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on management of patients with valvular heart disease). J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7:672–707.

    Bonow RO, Carabello B, de LA Jr, Edmunds LH Jr, Fedderly BJ, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, McKay CR, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Rahimtoola SH, Ritchie JL, Cheitlin MD, Eagle KA, Gardner TJ, Garson A Jr, Gibbons RJ, Russell RO, Ryan TJ, Smith SC Jr. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on management of patients with valvular heart disease). Circulation 1998; 98:1949–1984.

    Salem DN, Stein PD, Al-Ahmad A, Bussey HI, Horstkotte D, Miller N, Pauker SG. Antithrombotic therapy in valvular heart disease – native and prosthetic. The seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 2004; 126:457S–482S.

    Vaughan P, Waterworth PD, Vaughan P, Waterworth PD. An audit of anticoagulation practice among UK cardiothoracic consultant surgeons following valve replacement/repair. J Heart Valve Dis 2005; 14:576–582.

    Braunberger E, Deloche A, Berrebi A, Abdallah F, Celestin JA, Meimoun P, Chatellier G, Chauvaud S, Fabiani JN, Carpentier A. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier's techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation 2001; 104:12 Suppl 18–11.

    Chauvaud S, Fuzellier JF, Berrebi A, Deloche A, Fabiani JN, Carpentier A. Long-term (29 years) results of reconstructive surgery in rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation 2001; 104:12 Suppl 1I12–15.

    Jovin A, Hashim S, Jovin IS, Clancy JF, Klovekorn WP, Muller-Berghaus G. Atrial fibrillation at discharge from the hospital in patients undergoing mitral valve repair. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 53:41–45.

    Aramendi JL, Agredo J, Llorente A, Larrarte C, Pijoan J, Aramendi JL, Agredo J, Llorente A, Larrarte C, Pijoan J. Prevention of thromboembolism with ticlopidine shortly after valve repair or replacement with a bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7:610–614.

    Galloway AC, Colvin SB, Baumann FG, Esposito R, Vohra R, Harty S, Freeberg R, Kronzon I, Spencer FC, Galloway AC, Colvin SB, Baumann FG, Esposito R, Vohra R, Harty S, Freeberg R, Kronzon I, Spencer FC. Long-term results of mitral valve reconstruction with Carpentier techniques in 148 patients with mitral insufficiency. Circulation 1988; 78:3 Pt 2I97–105.

    Butchart EG, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Antunes MJ, Tornos P, De Caterina R, Cormier B, Prendergast B, Lung B, Bjornstad H, Leport C, Hall RJ, Vahanian A. Working groups on valvular heart disease, thrombosis, and cardiac rehabilitation and exercise physiology, European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for the management of patients after heart valve surgery. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:2463–2471.

    Vaughan P, Waterworth PD. An audit of anticoagulation practice among UK cardiothoracic consultant surgeons following valve replacement/repair. J Heart Valve Dis 2005; 14:576–582.

    Deloche A, Jebara VA, Relland JY, Chauvaud S, Fabiani JN, Perier P, Dreyfus G, Mihaileanu S, Carpentier A. Valve repair with Carpentier techniques. The second decade. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 99:990–1001.(Sanjay Asopa, Anish Patel)