More than one way to attach
http://www.100md.com
《细胞学杂志》
A new technique devised in Singer's lab gave the researchers a clearer look at the junction between cell and surface. They reared cells on a gelatin mat, which they could roll up like a carpet, freeze, and cut into thin slices. Staining the gap with two types of antibodies pinpointed proteins clustering on both sides of the membrane. When the researchers zoomed in on a type of contact called a focal adhesion, they saw no signs of fibronectin outside the cell, although it's a key component of some cell surface junctions (Chen and Singer, 1980). Fibronectin's absence meant that cells needed a second kind of receptor to attach to the extracellular fibers found in focal adhesions, the researchers hypothesized.
A follow-up study that included more kinds of contacts (Chen and Singer, 1982). They found that fibronectin amassed in two kinds of interactions, but not in two others. Moreover, at one type of fibronectin-rich junction, microfilaments inside the cell ran parallel to the membrane. But in another sort of interaction devoid of fibronectin, microfilaments attached to the membrane head-on, like an extension cord plugging into a wall socket. These structural differences solidified the case that cells carry different receptors for different extracellular matrix proteins, says Chen (now at the State University of New York, Stony Brook). One type fastens fibronectin to microfilaments stretching along the membrane; the other joins other extracellular proteins to microfilaments that arrive perpendicular to the membrane. Chen then teamed with Kenneth Yamada of the National Cancer Institute to
Different cell adhesion sites have different arrangements of vinculin (V) and fibronectin (F).
CHEN
characterize a fibronectin-grabbing receptor (Chen et al., 1985), which later work identified as an integrin. ML
Chen, W.-T., et al. 1985. J. Cell Biol. 100:1103–1114.
Chen, W.-T., and S.J. Singer. 1980. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 77:7318–7322.
Chen, W.-T., and S.J. Singer. 1982. J. Cell Biol. 95:205–222.
Singer, I.I. 1979. Cell. 16:675–685.
Singer and Ruoslahti. 1988. J. Cell Biol. 106:2171.(How cells connect to each other and to t)
A follow-up study that included more kinds of contacts (Chen and Singer, 1982). They found that fibronectin amassed in two kinds of interactions, but not in two others. Moreover, at one type of fibronectin-rich junction, microfilaments inside the cell ran parallel to the membrane. But in another sort of interaction devoid of fibronectin, microfilaments attached to the membrane head-on, like an extension cord plugging into a wall socket. These structural differences solidified the case that cells carry different receptors for different extracellular matrix proteins, says Chen (now at the State University of New York, Stony Brook). One type fastens fibronectin to microfilaments stretching along the membrane; the other joins other extracellular proteins to microfilaments that arrive perpendicular to the membrane. Chen then teamed with Kenneth Yamada of the National Cancer Institute to
Different cell adhesion sites have different arrangements of vinculin (V) and fibronectin (F).
CHEN
characterize a fibronectin-grabbing receptor (Chen et al., 1985), which later work identified as an integrin. ML
Chen, W.-T., et al. 1985. J. Cell Biol. 100:1103–1114.
Chen, W.-T., and S.J. Singer. 1980. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 77:7318–7322.
Chen, W.-T., and S.J. Singer. 1982. J. Cell Biol. 95:205–222.
Singer, I.I. 1979. Cell. 16:675–685.
Singer and Ruoslahti. 1988. J. Cell Biol. 106:2171.(How cells connect to each other and to t)