Role of ?2-integrins for homing and neovascularization capacity of endothelial progenitor cells
http://www.100md.com
《实验药学杂志》
The mechanisms of homing of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) to sites of ischemia are unclear. Here, we demonstrate that ex vivo–expanded EPCs as well as murine hematopoietic Sca-1+/Lin– progenitor cells express ?2-integrins, which mediate the adhesion of EPCs to endothelial cell monolayers and their chemokine-induced transendothelial migration in vitro. In a murine model of hind limb ischemia, Sca-1+/Lin– hematopoietic progenitor cells from ?2-integrin–deficient mice are less capable of homing to sites of ischemia and of improving neovascularization. Preactivation of the ?2-integrins expressed on EPCs by activating antibodies augments the EPC-induced neovascularization in vivo. These results provide evidence for a novel function of ?2-integrins in postnatal vasculogenesis.
T. Chavakis' present address is Experimental Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Abbreviations used: ?2–/–, ?2-integrin–deficient; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; MNC, mononuclear cell; vWF, von Willebrand factor.
The term vasculogenesis was originally introduced to describe the de novo formation of new vessels from angioblasts during embryonic development (1). Accumulating evidence suggests that vasculogenesis, mediated by circulating bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor or hematopoietic stem cells, plays an important role in postnatal neovascularization of adult ischemic tissues (2–7). Human endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were initially characterized by the expression of the VEGF receptor 2 (VEGF R2; Flk-1) and a hematopoietic marker such as CD133 (6). EPCs are mobilized from the bone marrow during ischemia (8, 9) or exogenously by stimulation with cytokines such as VEGF and contribute to neovascularization of ischemic tissues (4, 8, 10) or tumors (11). Infusion of EPCs or isolated hematopoietic progenitor cells (e.g., murine Sca-1+/Lin– cells) augmented neovascularization of ischemic myocardium and limbs and improved left ventricular function after myocardial ischemia (12–15). EPCs are preferentially recruited to sites of ischemia and incorporated into vascular structures (2, 4, 8, 12, 16). The mechanisms of EPC homing to sites of ischemia are still unclear. Because integrins are mediating the homing of transplanted hematopoietic stem cells to the bone marrow (17) as well as the recruitment of inflammatory cells to sites of inflammation, we investigated the contribution of integrins and especially of ?2-integrins for homing and neovascularization capacity of EPCs and hematopoietic stem cells to areas of ischemia.
Recruitment of inflammatory cells requires a coordinated sequence of multistep adhesive and signaling events, including selectin-mediated rolling, leukocyte activation by chemokines, integrin-mediated firm adhesion and diapedesis (18–22). During firm adhesion of leukocytes to the endothelium, members of the ?2-integrin family, LFA-1 (L?2, CD11a/CD18), Mac-1 (M?2, CD11b/CD18), and p150,95 (X?2, CD11c/CD18), as well as ?1-integrins on leukocytes interact with endothelial counterligands such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and surface-associated fibrinogen. Mac-1 also regulates leukocyte adhesion to provisional matrix substrates including fibrinogen, which is deposited at sites of inflammation and injury upon increased vascular permeability and damage (19, 20, 23). Because ?2-integrins are strongly expressed on EPCs, we studied the role of the ?2-integrins for homing and neovascularization capacity of peripheral blood–derived cultivated human EPCs, bone marrow–derived murine hematopoietic Sca-1+/Lin– as well as VEGF R2+/Lin– progenitor cells. Our results show that ?2-integrins mediate the adhesive interactions of EPCs to mature endothelial cells and to extracellular matrix proteins and are critical for chemokine-induced transendothelial migration of EPCs in vitro. In a mouse model of hind limb ischemia, using murine Sca-1+/Lin– hematopoietic progenitor cells from ?2-integrin–deficient (?2–/–) mice, we demonstrate that ?2-integrins are involved in the homing of hematopoietic progenitor cells to sites of ischemia and are critical for their neovascularization capacity. Alternately, preactivation of the ?2-integrins on EPCs by activating antibodies significantly augments the in vivo neovascularization capacity of EPCs, indicating a new therapeutic approach to promote homing of EPCs.
Results
EPCs express active ?2-integrins
To characterize the expression of adhesion receptors on EPCs, we used a microarray assay comparing EPCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The endothelial phenotype of the ex vivo–cultivated EPCs was confirmed by immunostaining, FACS analysis, and functional response to shear stress as described previously (12, 24, 25). Strikingly, EPCs expressed mRNA for the ?2-integrin subunit and for the corresponding CD11a, CD11b, and CD11c subunits, whereas mature endothelial cells showed only a very low mRNA expression of the ?2-integrins (Fig. 1 A). FACS analysis confirmed the surface expression of the ?2-integrin (CD18) and the CD11a, CD11b, and CD11c subunits (Fig. 1 B). Coexpression of the endothelial markers von Willebrand factor (vWF) and CD31 on ?2-integrin positive EPCs was demonstrated by FACS analysis (Fig. 1 B and not depicted). mRNA expression of eNOS and VE-cadherin confirmed the endothelial phenotype of the EPCs (Fig. 1 C and not depicted). In contrast with EPCs, mature endothelial cells (HUVECs) do not express the ?2-integrin subunit (CD18) on the cell surface (unpublished data).
Because ?2-integrins undergo a conformational activation in the presence of divalent cations, such as Mn2+ (26), we investigated whether Mn2+ is capable of activating ?2-integrins on the surface of EPCs. For this purpose, we detected activated ?2-integrins by using specific antibodies, which recognize activation-dependent epitopes of the CD11a (mAb24) and CD11b (CBRM1/5) subunits (27, 28). Although the stimulation of EPCs with Mn2+ had no effect on the total protein expression of CD11a or CD11b subunits, it enhanced the expression of the activation-dependent epitopes on the CD11a and CD11b subunits (Fig. 2 A). These results demonstrate that EPCs express functionally active ?2-integrins on their surface.
?2-integrins mediate adhesion of EPCs on endothelial cell monolayers and extracellular matrix proteins
To assess the functional capacity of ?2-integrins expressed by EPCs, we investigated their role in the adhesion of EPCs on mature endothelial cell monolayers (HUVECs) and on recombinant human ICAM-1 and fibrinogen in a static adhesion assay. Stimulation of EPCs with Mn2+ significantly increased the adhesion of EPCs to TNF-–prestimulated HUVECs. Addition of an inhibitory ?2-integrin antibody significantly blocked EPC adhesion to HUVECs (Fig. 2 B). VLA–4 as well as V?3-integrin can also mediate intercellular adhesive interactions by binding to VCAM-1 and PECAM-1, respectively (23, 29). Therefore, a synthetic VLA-4 inhibitor and a cyclic RGD peptide (established inhibitor of the V?3- and V?5-integrin) were engaged in these studies. However, these inhibitors did not significantly inhibit EPC adhesion to HUVECs (Fig. 2 B). An inhibitory VLA-4 antibody (clone HP2/1), as well as an inhibitory ?1-integrin antibody (clone 6S6), also had no effect on the adhesion of EPCs to HUVECs (unpublished data). These results demonstrate that EPC adhesion to endothelial cells is predominantly mediated by ?2-integrins expressed on EPCs.
Endothelial ICAM-1 and extracellular matrix-associated fibrinogen are established ligands for the ?2-integrins (30–33). Therefore, we investigated whether EPCs are capable of binding to immobilized recombinant human ICAM-1 and fibrinogen via ?2-integrins. Indeed, stimulation with either Mn2+ or an activating ?2-integrin antibody (KIM185) induced adhesion of EPCs to immobilized human ICAM-1 and fibrinogen (Fig. 2, C and D). Adhesion induced by both stimuli was completely abolished in the presence of an inhibitory ?2-integrin antibody (Fig. 2, C and D). In contrast, an inhibitory ?1-integrin antibody had no effect on the adhesion of EPCs to human ICAM-1 (unpublished data). These results demonstrate that EPCs bind to fibrinogen and endothelial ICAM-1 in a ?2-integrin–dependent manner.
Role of ?2-integrins for transmigration of EPCs
We investigated the involvement of ?2-integrins in the transendothelial migration of EPCs in a transwell transmigration assay. Chemoattraction of EPCs by MCP-1, SDF-1, and VEGF significantly increased the transmigration rate of EPCs through HUVEC monolayers (Fig. 3). Addition of an inhibitory ?2-integrin antibody (anti-CD18) significantly reduced EPC transmigration, whereas an inhibitory ?1-integrin antibody (anti-CD29) and RGD peptides had no effect (Fig. 3). Moreover, an inhibitory VLA-4 antibody did not affect chemokine-induced transendothelial migration of EPCs (unpublished data). Thus, ?2-integrins, but not ?1-integrins, mediate chemokine and VEGF-induced transendothelial migration of EPCs (Fig. 3).
Role of ?2-integrins for neovascularization after ischemia
Next, we determined whether ?2–/– mice have an impaired neovascularization capacity. Hind limb ischemia was induced in WT and ?2–/– mice. Perfusion was assessed 14 d after induction of ischemia by laser Doppler imaging. ?2–/– mice showed a significantly impaired recovery in limb perfusion as compared with WT controls (Fig. 4, A and B), suggesting that ?2-integrins contribute to neovascularization after ischemia.
Role of ?2-integrins for the in vivo homing and neovascularization capacity of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells
To assess the in vivo relevance of ?2-integrins for progenitor cell homing to sites of ischemia and progenitor cell–induced neovascularization, we used bone marrow–derived stem/progenitor cells in a mouse model of hind limb ischemia. First, we detected the expression of C D18 on peripheral blood Sca-1+/c-kit+ cells. The ?2-integrin subunit CD18 was expressed on >95% of the Sca-1+/c-kit+ cells (Fig. 5 A). Peripheral blood cells from ?2–/– mice were used as negative control. As expected, no CD18 staining was detectable (Fig. 5 A). Second, we isolated Sca-1+/Lin– progenitor cells from the bone marrow of wild-type mice by magnetic beads and detected the expression of ?2-integrin by FACS analysis. The majority of isolated Sca-1+/Lin– cells (98.5 ± 0.2%) expressed the CD18 surface antigen. Moreover, adhesion of murine bone marrow Lin– progenitor cells to TNF-–pretreated mature endothelial cells was significantly blocked by ?2-blocking antibodies (unpublished data).
The functional activity of the stem/progenitor cells to improve neovascularization was assessed by intravenous infusion of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells derived from either wild-type or ?2–/– mice into athymic mice 24 h after induction of limb ischemia. After 14 d, transplantation of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells from wild-type mice significantly enhanced the recovery of blood flow of the ischemic hind limbs of athymic mice as compared with ischemic hind limbs from untreated athymic mice (Fig. 5 B). In contrast, ?2–/– Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells were significantly less effective for improving recovery of limb perfusion as compared with wild-type Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells (Fig. 5 B).
Moreover, histological evaluation of ischemic hind limbs of athymic mice 14 d after cell infusion revealed a significantly lower capillary density in mice receiving ?2–/– Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells compared with mice receiving wild-type cells (Fig. 5 C). Furthermore, the number of incorporated male Sca-1+/Lin– cells in female recipients was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the murine Y-chromosome of the infused male cells. The number of incorporated Y-chromosome positive cells was significantly lower for the infusion of ?2–/– cells as compared with the infusion of wild-type cells (Fig. 5, D and E).
Similar results were obtained when using isolated VEGF R2+/Lin– bone marrow–derived cells. The majority of VEGF R2+/Lin– cells expressed CD18 (89 ± 9.6%). Moreover, VEGF R2+/Lin– cells derived from CD18–/– mice cells showed a significantly reduced capacity to augment blood flow after ischemia as compared with WT cells (WT 180 ± 15% of untreated control mice; CD18–/– cells: 125 ± 7% of untreated control mice). These results indicate that the ?2-integrins are involved in the homing of progenitor cells to ischemic tissues and their neovascularization capacity.
Activation of the ?2-integrins improves in vivo homing and neovascularization capacity of EPCs
Because ?2-integrins are involved in the homing of EPCs, we investigated whether preactivation of ?2-integrins may improve homing and neovascularization capacity of human EPCs in the mouse model of hind limb ischemia. Ex vivo–expanded human EPCs isolated from peripheral blood were pretreated with the ?2-integrin–activating antibody (KIM 185), which was shown before to enhance ?2-integrin–dependent adhesion of EPCs to endothelial ICAM-1 or fibrinogen (Fig. 2), and were subsequently infused into athymic mice. To be able to detect an increase in progenitor cell–mediated neovascularization, we used a reduced number of EPCs (105 cells), which is lower than previously published numbers (5 x 105 EPCs; reference 25), to yield a 50% improvement of neovascularization as compared with untreated mice.
Preincubation of the EPCs with the activating ?2-integrin antibody resulted in a significantly enhanced neovascularization capacity of infused EPCs in comparison with control antibody-treated EPCs as assessed by laser Doppler imaging (Fig. 6 A). Incorporation of human EPCs was detected by confocal microscopy using antibodies directed against human HLA and the endothelial marker protein vWF (Fig. 6, B–D). Incorporation of ?2-activating antibody-treated EPCs into the ischemic muscle was increased in comparison with control antibody-treated EPCs (Fig. 6, B and C). Moreover, the numbers of capillaries and small arterioles (20–50 μm) were significantly augmented in mice treated with preactivated EPCs (Fig. 6, E and F; capillary density: EPC + control mAb: 0.77 ± 0.10 capillaries per myocyte; EPC + activating mAb: 1.32 ± 0.09; P = 0.003). Thus, an external activation of the ?2-integrins by an activating antibody before infusion is capable of improving the neovascularization capacity of EPCs.
Discussion
The data of the present paper underscore the importance of ?2-integrins for the proangiogenic activity of EPCs and bone marrow–derived progenitor cells. Specifically, our investigations revealed the following: (a) EPCs as well as hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells express ?2-integrins; (b) ?2-integrins expressed on EPCs can be activated by Mn2+ and can mediate the adhesion of EPCs to mature endothelial cells, to recombinant human ICAM-1, and to fibrinogen and the chemokine-induced transendothelial migration of EPCs; (c) ?2–/– animals display a neovascularization defect in the model of hind limb ischemia; (d) ?2-integrins are involved in the in vivo homing of progenitor cells to sites of ischemia and their vascular integration and significantly contributed to the neovascularization capacity of infused bone marrow Sca-1+/Lin– or VEGF R2+/Lin– progenitor cells in the mouse model of hind limb ischemia as demonstrated using the ?2–/– progenitor cell populations; (e) stimulation of ex vivo–expanded human EPCs by preincubation with an activating ?2-integrin antibody significantly enhanced the homing of EPCs to sites of ischemia and EPC-induced neovascularization. Therefore, the present paper unravels a novel function of the ?2-integrin subunit CD18 for neovascularization exceeding its well-known function in innate and adaptive immune responses.
Increasing evidence suggests that ?2-integrins are not only expressed on differentiated leukocytes but also on hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (34, 35). Our in vitro data suggest that ?2-integrins expressed on EPCs mediate homing functions such as endothelial adhesion and transmigration. Moreover, ?2-integrins contribute to the in vivo homing of bone marrow–derived progenitor cells to ischemic tissue. In line with these data, it has been reported previously that ?2-integrins mediate adhesion and transmigration of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (36–38). In a recent paper assessing in vivo homing of embryonic EPCs derived from cord blood, the circulating cells arrested within tumor microvessels extravasated into the interstitium and incorporated into neovessels, suggesting that adhesion and transmigration are involved in the recruitment of EPCs to sites of tumor angiogenesis (39). Thus, it is conceivable to speculate that ex vivo–expanded adult EPCs and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells may engage similar pathways for recruitment to sites of ischemia and incorporation into newly forming vessels.
Our in vivo data provide the first evidence for a direct participation of ?2-integrins in neovascularization processes and particularly in stem/progenitor cell–mediated, ischemia-induced vasculogenesis. Adamis and colleagues previously highlighted the role of ?2-integrins for corneal and choroidal angiogenesis induced by injury (40, 41). In both studies, ?2–/– mice displayed a reduced inflammation-associated angiogenic response after injury and these effects were associated with reduced inflammatory cell infiltrates (40, 41). Yet, no incorporation of leukocytes into new vessels was reported in these studies. Moreover, the same group demonstrated that, in the case of retinal ischemia, leukocyte–endothelial cell interactions contribute to the development of ischemia by inducing vascular obliteration via Fas ligand–mediated endothelial cell apoptosis (42). In contrast with these findings, our data provide evidence that, during hind limb ischemia, intravenous infusion of bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor cells leads to incorporation of the transplanted cells in newly formed vessels and to improvement of neovascularization in an at least partially ?2-integrin–dependent manner. As opposed to EPCs, infusion of inflammatory cells, such as monocytes/macrophages, had only a slight if any effect on the neovascularization of ischemic limbs in the model of hind limb ischemia in athymic mice (25). Thus, our results support a novel direct function of ?2-integrins in progenitor cell–induced vasculogenesis during ischemia, which is distinct from the indirect role of ?2-integrins in the inflammation-associated angiogenesis described by Adamis and colleagues (40, 41). Because the ?2–/– mice display no defect in the mobilization of progenitor cells (43), the neovascularization defect in the ?2–/– mice in the model of hind limb ischemia is most conceivably mediated by a homing defect of progenitor cells into ischemic tissue.
Interestingly, our present data indicate that the recruitment of hematopoietic progenitor cells to sites of ischemia is mediated at least in part by different mechanisms compared with the homing of infused cells into the bone marrow of lethally irradiated recipient mice, which is predominantly mediated via 4?1 (17, 43). In this context, ?2-integrins only act in a synergistic manner together with the 4?1-integrin. Our finding that ?2-integrin deficiency does not completely block homing and neovascularization improvement after infusion of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells suggests that other mechanisms may additionally be involved in these processes. We cannot exclude that 4?1-integrin partially compensates for the lack of ?2-integrin during in vivo homing of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells. Interestingly, the homing of inflammatory cells during pneumonia or myocardial ischemia in ?2–/– mice is mediated by the 4?1-integrin (44, 45). Moreover, the initial cell arrest of embryonic progenitor cell homing during tumor angiogenesis was suggested to be mediated by E- and P-selectin and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (39). Yet, it is important to underscore that this work was performed with embryonic EPCs, whereas we used adult EPCs and bone marrow stem/progenitor cells. It is likely that different cell types may use distinct mechanisms for homing to sites of ischemia. In addition, it is well established that interactions of selectins with selectin–ligands mediate the rolling of cells on the surface of endothelial cells as the initial step of homing (21). Further studies are needed to elucidate a potentially synergistic role of other adhesion molecules and their counterligands for the multistep recruitment process of adult endothelial progenitor and stem cells to ischemic tissue.
Regardless of potentially additive mechanisms involved in the recruitment of stem/progenitor cells to areas of ischemia, our data clearly demonstrate that preincubation of EPCs with a ?2-integrin–activating antibody markedly enhanced the incorporation of transplanted EPCs in vessels and the neovascularization of ischemic limbs. The peripheral blood–derived EPCs used in the present paper are already used in clinical trials to improve neovascularization in patients with ischemic heart diseases (15). Thus, our results could have important clinical implications as they disclose a mechanism to enhance homing of EPCs and, thereby, improve neovascularization capacity of infused EPCs.
In summary, the present paper demonstrates for the first time a critical role of ?2-integrins in vitro and in vivo for homing and neovascularization capacity of endothelial progenitor and hematopoietic progenitor cells. Moreover, our results show that activation of ?2-integrins appears to be a feasible and promising tool to improve the efficacy of EPC-induced neovascularization. A better understanding of the homing mechanisms of EPCs may lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies for improvement of vasculogenesis in patients with ischemic diseases.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated by density–gradient centrifugation with Ficoll from peripheral blood of healthy human volunteers as described previously (46). Immediately after isolation, total MNCs (8 x 106 cells/ml medium; cell density 2.5 x 106 cells/cm2) were plated on culture dishes coated with 10 μg/ml human fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich) and maintained in endothelial basal medium (Cambrex) supplemented with 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 12 μg/ml bovine brain extract, 50 μg/ml gentamycin, 50 ng/ml amphotericin B, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, and 20% FCS. After 3 d, nonadherent cells were removed, and adherent cells were incubated in medium for another 24 h before initiation of the experiments. EPCs were characterized by dual staining for 1,1'–dioctadecyl–3,3',3'–tetramethylindo-carbocyanine–labeled acetyl low-density lipoprotein, lectin, and expression of endothelial markers KDR, VE-cadherin, and vWF (25).
Sca-1+/Lin– cells were purified from BM MNCs from wild-type and CD18–/– mice by negative selection using a cocktail of biotinylated antibodies to lineage markers (Lineage cell depletion kit, mouse; Miltenyi Biotec) for 10 min at 4°C followed by antibiotin microbeads for 15 min (Miltenyi Biotec). The Lin– BM cells were incubated with anti–Sca-1 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) for 15 min and Sca-1+/Lin– BM cells were collected (7). To obtain VEGFR2+ Lin– cells, Lin– cells were incubated with biotinylated Flk-1 antibodies (DSB-X biotin protein labeling kit; Molecular Probes; antibody was obtained from BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 4°C followed by antibiotin microbeads for 15 min.
HUVECs were purchased from Cambrex and cultured in endothelial basal medium supplemented with 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 12 μg/ml bovine brain extract, 50 μg/ml gentamycin, 50 ng/ml amphotericin-B, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, and 10% FCS until the third passage. After detachment with trypsin, cells (4 x 105 cells) were grown in 6-cm cell culture dishes or 96-well plates for at least 18 h as described previously (47).
Oligonucleotide microarrays, FACS
10 μg of total RNA was hybridized to the HG-U95Av2 microarray (9670 human genes; Affymetrix, Inc.). The standard protocol used for sample preparation and microarray processing is available from Affymetrix, Inc. Expression data were analyzed using Microarray Suite version 5.0 (Affymetrix, Inc.) and GeneSpring version 4.2 (Silicon Genetics). 3 x 105 human EPCs, peripheral blood, or isolated Sca-1+/Lin– cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with FITC- or PE-labeled antibodies (anti-CD11a, -CD11b, -CD11c, -CD18, –Sca-1, and –c-kit; BD Biosciences; anti-vWF was obtained from Acris) or CBRM1/5-antibody (BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 37°C. The mAb24 antibody (provided by N. Hogg, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, England, UK) was incubated for 30 min at 4°C and detected with a secondary FITC-labeled goat anti–mouse antibody (DakoCytomation). Surface expression was quantified using a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences).
Adhesion, transmigration experiments
Cell–cell adhesion
Cell–cell adhesion was performed as described previously (48, 49). Confluent HUVEC monolayers were stimulated with TNF- (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h. Ex vivo–expanded EPCs were stained with Cell Tracker green-CMFDA (Molecular Probes) and were resolved in adhesion buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Hepes, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.05% BSA, pH 7.4). A total of 105 EPCs/well (in 100 μl adhesion buffer) was added to the HUVEC monolayers in the absence or presence of blocking monoclonal ?2-integrin antibodies (clone IB4; Qbiogene; or mAb 60.3; J. Harlan, University of Washington, Seattle, WA), murine isotype control antibodies (Qbiogene), inhibitory agents cyclic RGD peptide or VLA-4 inhibitor (4-[{2-methyl-phenyl}aminocarbonyl]aminophenyl)acetyl-fibronectin-CS-1 fragment (1980–1983). After 20 min of incubation (37°C), the plates were washed twice with adhesion buffer at room temperature to remove nonadherent cells. Adherent cell tracker green-labeled EPCs were quantified in triplicates on a fluorescence plate reader (Fluostat; BMG Lab Technologies).
Cell–matrix adhesion
Cell–matrix adhesion was performed as described previously (48, 49). 96-well plates were coated overnight (4°C) with 10 μg/ml human fibrinogen (Enzyme Research Laboratories) or soluble recombinant human ICAM-1 (Bender MedSystems) and blocked with 1% (wt/vol) BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Ex vivo–expanded human EPCs in adhesion buffer were seeded at 1.2 x 105 cells/well in 100 μl in the absence or presence of 2 mM MnCl2 or activating human ?2-integrin antibody (clone KIM185; M. Robinson, Celltech Ltd., Slough, England, UK) and were incubated with blocking ?2-integrin mAb (clone IB4 or mAb 60.3) or murine isotype control antibodies (Qbiogene) for 20 min at 37°C. After removal of nonadherent cells by two washing steps, adhesion was quantified in triplicates by counting adherent cells in five randomly selected fields per well (magnification, 20; Axiovert 100; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.).
Transmigration
Transendothelial migration was performed as described previously (50) using 6.5-mm transwell filters with 8-μm pore size (Costar). After inserts were coated with 0.2% gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich), HUVECs were seeded on transwell filters and cultivated for 48 h before the experiments were performed in a humidified atmosphere (37°C, 5% CO2). At the beginning of the experiment, 600 μl of migration assay medium (serum-free RPMI 1640 in the absence or presence of MCP-1, SDF1, or VEGF; R&D Systems) was added to the lower compartment of the transwell system. EPCs (5 x 105 in 100 μL) were added to the top compartment in the presence or absence of 30 μg/ml of blocking anti–?2-integrin antibody (mAb 60.3), anti–?1-integrin antibody (clone 6S6; Chemicon), anti–4-integrin antibody (clone HP2.1; Immunotech), murine isotype control antibodies (Qbiogene), or RGD peptides. After 18 h at 37°C, the number of cells transmigrated to the bottom compartment was quantified in duplicates with a cell counter (CASY-Counter; Sch?rfe-System). All inserts were fixed and stained to confirm the confluence of the endothelial monolayer.
Animal experiments
Mice.
8-wk-old ?2–/– mice and their age-matched wild-type littermates (either 129/Sv or C57BL/6J) were generated as described previously (51). All mice were genotyped by Southern blot analysis (51) and maintained under pathogen-free conditions. Athymic NMRI nude mice (6–8 wk) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. The animal experiments were approved from the Regional Board of Land Hessen, Germany.
Model of hind limb ischemia
The proximal femoral artery, including the superficial and the deep branch as well as the distal saphenous artery, were ligated. In transplantation experiments, progenitor cells were intravenously injected in nude mice 24 h after induction of limb ischemia. Human EPCs were pretreated with 20 μg/ml activating ?2-integrin antibody (clone KIM 185) or isotype control antibody for 30 min at 37°C and washed twice to remove unbound antibodies before injection (105 EPCs/mouse). In some experiments, sex-mismatched murine Sca-1+/Lin– or Flk-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells from male ?2–/– or wild-type mice were used. After 2 wk, we calculated the ischemic (right) versus normal (left) limb blood flow ratio using a Laser Doppler blood flow imager (Moor Instruments).
Histology.
The capillary density and the number and size of conductant vessels in the semimembraneous and adductor muscles were determined using 8-μm cryosections. Endothelial cells were identified with the panendothelial marker MECA-32 followed by donkey anti–rat IgG Alexa488 or CD31-FITC (BD Biosciences). Injected human EPCs were identified by costaining for HLA-ABC (allophycocyanin labeled; BD Biosciences) and vWF (Acris). Male murine BM-derived cells were identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the murine Y-chromosome (Cy3-labeled probe: Cambio; reference 7). Nuclei were stained with Sytox (Molecular Probes). Images were obtained by confocal microscopy (LSM 510; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.).
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD or SEM. Comparisons between groups were analyzed by Student's t test (two-sided) or analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment for experiments with more than two subgroups (SPSS 11.5 software). p-values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Muhly-Reinholz, T. R?xe, and M. N?her for their excellent technical assistance. Moreover, we thank Drs. N. Hogg, J. Harlan, and M. Robinson for providing the antibodies mAb24, mAb60.3, and KIM185, respectively.
This work was supported by the Forschergruppe 501 (He 3044/2-2 to C. Heeschen) and the Alfried Krupp-Stiftung (to S. Dimmeler). K. Sasaki was in part supported by the Japan Heart Foundation/Bayer Yakuhin Research Grant Abroad. The work of K. Scharffetter-Kochanek was funded in party by the Collaborative Research Center SFB497-C7, Ulm.
References
Carmeliet, P. 2000. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat. Med. 6:389–395.
Asahara, T., T. Murohara, A. Sullivan, M. Silver, R. van der Zee, T. Li, B. Witzenbichler, G. Schatteman, and J.M. Isner. 1997. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 275:964–967.
Shi, Q., S. Rafii, M.H. Wu, E.S. Wijelath, C. Yu, A. Ishida, Y. Fujita, S. Kothari, R. Mohle, L.R. Sauvage, et al. 1998. Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood. 92:362–367.
Asahara, T., H. Masuda, T. Takahashi, C. Kalka, C. Pastore, M. Silver, M. Kearne, M. Magner, and J.M. Isner. 1999. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ. Res. 85:221–228.
Grant, M.B., W.S. May, S. Caballero, G.A. Brown, S.M. Guthrie, R.N. Mames, B.J. Byrne, T. Vaught, P.E. Spoerri, A.B. Peck, and E.W. Scott. 2002. Adult hematopoietic stem cells provide functional hemangioblast activity during retinal neovascularization. Nat. Med. 8:607–612.
Rafii, S., and D. Lyden. 2003. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat. Med. 9:702–712.
Aicher, A., C. Heeschen, C. Mildner-Rihm, C. Urbich, C. Ihling, K. Technau-Ihling, A.M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler. 2003. Essential role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase for mobilization of stem and progenitor cells. Nat. Med. 9:1370–1376.
Takahashi, T., C. Kalka, H. Masuda, D. Chen, M. Silver, M. Kearney, M. Magner, J.M. Isner, and T. Asahara. 1999. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat. Med. 5:434–438.(Emmanouil Chavakis1, Alex)
T. Chavakis' present address is Experimental Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Abbreviations used: ?2–/–, ?2-integrin–deficient; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; MNC, mononuclear cell; vWF, von Willebrand factor.
The term vasculogenesis was originally introduced to describe the de novo formation of new vessels from angioblasts during embryonic development (1). Accumulating evidence suggests that vasculogenesis, mediated by circulating bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor or hematopoietic stem cells, plays an important role in postnatal neovascularization of adult ischemic tissues (2–7). Human endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were initially characterized by the expression of the VEGF receptor 2 (VEGF R2; Flk-1) and a hematopoietic marker such as CD133 (6). EPCs are mobilized from the bone marrow during ischemia (8, 9) or exogenously by stimulation with cytokines such as VEGF and contribute to neovascularization of ischemic tissues (4, 8, 10) or tumors (11). Infusion of EPCs or isolated hematopoietic progenitor cells (e.g., murine Sca-1+/Lin– cells) augmented neovascularization of ischemic myocardium and limbs and improved left ventricular function after myocardial ischemia (12–15). EPCs are preferentially recruited to sites of ischemia and incorporated into vascular structures (2, 4, 8, 12, 16). The mechanisms of EPC homing to sites of ischemia are still unclear. Because integrins are mediating the homing of transplanted hematopoietic stem cells to the bone marrow (17) as well as the recruitment of inflammatory cells to sites of inflammation, we investigated the contribution of integrins and especially of ?2-integrins for homing and neovascularization capacity of EPCs and hematopoietic stem cells to areas of ischemia.
Recruitment of inflammatory cells requires a coordinated sequence of multistep adhesive and signaling events, including selectin-mediated rolling, leukocyte activation by chemokines, integrin-mediated firm adhesion and diapedesis (18–22). During firm adhesion of leukocytes to the endothelium, members of the ?2-integrin family, LFA-1 (L?2, CD11a/CD18), Mac-1 (M?2, CD11b/CD18), and p150,95 (X?2, CD11c/CD18), as well as ?1-integrins on leukocytes interact with endothelial counterligands such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and surface-associated fibrinogen. Mac-1 also regulates leukocyte adhesion to provisional matrix substrates including fibrinogen, which is deposited at sites of inflammation and injury upon increased vascular permeability and damage (19, 20, 23). Because ?2-integrins are strongly expressed on EPCs, we studied the role of the ?2-integrins for homing and neovascularization capacity of peripheral blood–derived cultivated human EPCs, bone marrow–derived murine hematopoietic Sca-1+/Lin– as well as VEGF R2+/Lin– progenitor cells. Our results show that ?2-integrins mediate the adhesive interactions of EPCs to mature endothelial cells and to extracellular matrix proteins and are critical for chemokine-induced transendothelial migration of EPCs in vitro. In a mouse model of hind limb ischemia, using murine Sca-1+/Lin– hematopoietic progenitor cells from ?2-integrin–deficient (?2–/–) mice, we demonstrate that ?2-integrins are involved in the homing of hematopoietic progenitor cells to sites of ischemia and are critical for their neovascularization capacity. Alternately, preactivation of the ?2-integrins on EPCs by activating antibodies significantly augments the in vivo neovascularization capacity of EPCs, indicating a new therapeutic approach to promote homing of EPCs.
Results
EPCs express active ?2-integrins
To characterize the expression of adhesion receptors on EPCs, we used a microarray assay comparing EPCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The endothelial phenotype of the ex vivo–cultivated EPCs was confirmed by immunostaining, FACS analysis, and functional response to shear stress as described previously (12, 24, 25). Strikingly, EPCs expressed mRNA for the ?2-integrin subunit and for the corresponding CD11a, CD11b, and CD11c subunits, whereas mature endothelial cells showed only a very low mRNA expression of the ?2-integrins (Fig. 1 A). FACS analysis confirmed the surface expression of the ?2-integrin (CD18) and the CD11a, CD11b, and CD11c subunits (Fig. 1 B). Coexpression of the endothelial markers von Willebrand factor (vWF) and CD31 on ?2-integrin positive EPCs was demonstrated by FACS analysis (Fig. 1 B and not depicted). mRNA expression of eNOS and VE-cadherin confirmed the endothelial phenotype of the EPCs (Fig. 1 C and not depicted). In contrast with EPCs, mature endothelial cells (HUVECs) do not express the ?2-integrin subunit (CD18) on the cell surface (unpublished data).
Because ?2-integrins undergo a conformational activation in the presence of divalent cations, such as Mn2+ (26), we investigated whether Mn2+ is capable of activating ?2-integrins on the surface of EPCs. For this purpose, we detected activated ?2-integrins by using specific antibodies, which recognize activation-dependent epitopes of the CD11a (mAb24) and CD11b (CBRM1/5) subunits (27, 28). Although the stimulation of EPCs with Mn2+ had no effect on the total protein expression of CD11a or CD11b subunits, it enhanced the expression of the activation-dependent epitopes on the CD11a and CD11b subunits (Fig. 2 A). These results demonstrate that EPCs express functionally active ?2-integrins on their surface.
?2-integrins mediate adhesion of EPCs on endothelial cell monolayers and extracellular matrix proteins
To assess the functional capacity of ?2-integrins expressed by EPCs, we investigated their role in the adhesion of EPCs on mature endothelial cell monolayers (HUVECs) and on recombinant human ICAM-1 and fibrinogen in a static adhesion assay. Stimulation of EPCs with Mn2+ significantly increased the adhesion of EPCs to TNF-–prestimulated HUVECs. Addition of an inhibitory ?2-integrin antibody significantly blocked EPC adhesion to HUVECs (Fig. 2 B). VLA–4 as well as V?3-integrin can also mediate intercellular adhesive interactions by binding to VCAM-1 and PECAM-1, respectively (23, 29). Therefore, a synthetic VLA-4 inhibitor and a cyclic RGD peptide (established inhibitor of the V?3- and V?5-integrin) were engaged in these studies. However, these inhibitors did not significantly inhibit EPC adhesion to HUVECs (Fig. 2 B). An inhibitory VLA-4 antibody (clone HP2/1), as well as an inhibitory ?1-integrin antibody (clone 6S6), also had no effect on the adhesion of EPCs to HUVECs (unpublished data). These results demonstrate that EPC adhesion to endothelial cells is predominantly mediated by ?2-integrins expressed on EPCs.
Endothelial ICAM-1 and extracellular matrix-associated fibrinogen are established ligands for the ?2-integrins (30–33). Therefore, we investigated whether EPCs are capable of binding to immobilized recombinant human ICAM-1 and fibrinogen via ?2-integrins. Indeed, stimulation with either Mn2+ or an activating ?2-integrin antibody (KIM185) induced adhesion of EPCs to immobilized human ICAM-1 and fibrinogen (Fig. 2, C and D). Adhesion induced by both stimuli was completely abolished in the presence of an inhibitory ?2-integrin antibody (Fig. 2, C and D). In contrast, an inhibitory ?1-integrin antibody had no effect on the adhesion of EPCs to human ICAM-1 (unpublished data). These results demonstrate that EPCs bind to fibrinogen and endothelial ICAM-1 in a ?2-integrin–dependent manner.
Role of ?2-integrins for transmigration of EPCs
We investigated the involvement of ?2-integrins in the transendothelial migration of EPCs in a transwell transmigration assay. Chemoattraction of EPCs by MCP-1, SDF-1, and VEGF significantly increased the transmigration rate of EPCs through HUVEC monolayers (Fig. 3). Addition of an inhibitory ?2-integrin antibody (anti-CD18) significantly reduced EPC transmigration, whereas an inhibitory ?1-integrin antibody (anti-CD29) and RGD peptides had no effect (Fig. 3). Moreover, an inhibitory VLA-4 antibody did not affect chemokine-induced transendothelial migration of EPCs (unpublished data). Thus, ?2-integrins, but not ?1-integrins, mediate chemokine and VEGF-induced transendothelial migration of EPCs (Fig. 3).
Role of ?2-integrins for neovascularization after ischemia
Next, we determined whether ?2–/– mice have an impaired neovascularization capacity. Hind limb ischemia was induced in WT and ?2–/– mice. Perfusion was assessed 14 d after induction of ischemia by laser Doppler imaging. ?2–/– mice showed a significantly impaired recovery in limb perfusion as compared with WT controls (Fig. 4, A and B), suggesting that ?2-integrins contribute to neovascularization after ischemia.
Role of ?2-integrins for the in vivo homing and neovascularization capacity of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells
To assess the in vivo relevance of ?2-integrins for progenitor cell homing to sites of ischemia and progenitor cell–induced neovascularization, we used bone marrow–derived stem/progenitor cells in a mouse model of hind limb ischemia. First, we detected the expression of C D18 on peripheral blood Sca-1+/c-kit+ cells. The ?2-integrin subunit CD18 was expressed on >95% of the Sca-1+/c-kit+ cells (Fig. 5 A). Peripheral blood cells from ?2–/– mice were used as negative control. As expected, no CD18 staining was detectable (Fig. 5 A). Second, we isolated Sca-1+/Lin– progenitor cells from the bone marrow of wild-type mice by magnetic beads and detected the expression of ?2-integrin by FACS analysis. The majority of isolated Sca-1+/Lin– cells (98.5 ± 0.2%) expressed the CD18 surface antigen. Moreover, adhesion of murine bone marrow Lin– progenitor cells to TNF-–pretreated mature endothelial cells was significantly blocked by ?2-blocking antibodies (unpublished data).
The functional activity of the stem/progenitor cells to improve neovascularization was assessed by intravenous infusion of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells derived from either wild-type or ?2–/– mice into athymic mice 24 h after induction of limb ischemia. After 14 d, transplantation of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells from wild-type mice significantly enhanced the recovery of blood flow of the ischemic hind limbs of athymic mice as compared with ischemic hind limbs from untreated athymic mice (Fig. 5 B). In contrast, ?2–/– Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells were significantly less effective for improving recovery of limb perfusion as compared with wild-type Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells (Fig. 5 B).
Moreover, histological evaluation of ischemic hind limbs of athymic mice 14 d after cell infusion revealed a significantly lower capillary density in mice receiving ?2–/– Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells compared with mice receiving wild-type cells (Fig. 5 C). Furthermore, the number of incorporated male Sca-1+/Lin– cells in female recipients was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the murine Y-chromosome of the infused male cells. The number of incorporated Y-chromosome positive cells was significantly lower for the infusion of ?2–/– cells as compared with the infusion of wild-type cells (Fig. 5, D and E).
Similar results were obtained when using isolated VEGF R2+/Lin– bone marrow–derived cells. The majority of VEGF R2+/Lin– cells expressed CD18 (89 ± 9.6%). Moreover, VEGF R2+/Lin– cells derived from CD18–/– mice cells showed a significantly reduced capacity to augment blood flow after ischemia as compared with WT cells (WT 180 ± 15% of untreated control mice; CD18–/– cells: 125 ± 7% of untreated control mice). These results indicate that the ?2-integrins are involved in the homing of progenitor cells to ischemic tissues and their neovascularization capacity.
Activation of the ?2-integrins improves in vivo homing and neovascularization capacity of EPCs
Because ?2-integrins are involved in the homing of EPCs, we investigated whether preactivation of ?2-integrins may improve homing and neovascularization capacity of human EPCs in the mouse model of hind limb ischemia. Ex vivo–expanded human EPCs isolated from peripheral blood were pretreated with the ?2-integrin–activating antibody (KIM 185), which was shown before to enhance ?2-integrin–dependent adhesion of EPCs to endothelial ICAM-1 or fibrinogen (Fig. 2), and were subsequently infused into athymic mice. To be able to detect an increase in progenitor cell–mediated neovascularization, we used a reduced number of EPCs (105 cells), which is lower than previously published numbers (5 x 105 EPCs; reference 25), to yield a 50% improvement of neovascularization as compared with untreated mice.
Preincubation of the EPCs with the activating ?2-integrin antibody resulted in a significantly enhanced neovascularization capacity of infused EPCs in comparison with control antibody-treated EPCs as assessed by laser Doppler imaging (Fig. 6 A). Incorporation of human EPCs was detected by confocal microscopy using antibodies directed against human HLA and the endothelial marker protein vWF (Fig. 6, B–D). Incorporation of ?2-activating antibody-treated EPCs into the ischemic muscle was increased in comparison with control antibody-treated EPCs (Fig. 6, B and C). Moreover, the numbers of capillaries and small arterioles (20–50 μm) were significantly augmented in mice treated with preactivated EPCs (Fig. 6, E and F; capillary density: EPC + control mAb: 0.77 ± 0.10 capillaries per myocyte; EPC + activating mAb: 1.32 ± 0.09; P = 0.003). Thus, an external activation of the ?2-integrins by an activating antibody before infusion is capable of improving the neovascularization capacity of EPCs.
Discussion
The data of the present paper underscore the importance of ?2-integrins for the proangiogenic activity of EPCs and bone marrow–derived progenitor cells. Specifically, our investigations revealed the following: (a) EPCs as well as hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells express ?2-integrins; (b) ?2-integrins expressed on EPCs can be activated by Mn2+ and can mediate the adhesion of EPCs to mature endothelial cells, to recombinant human ICAM-1, and to fibrinogen and the chemokine-induced transendothelial migration of EPCs; (c) ?2–/– animals display a neovascularization defect in the model of hind limb ischemia; (d) ?2-integrins are involved in the in vivo homing of progenitor cells to sites of ischemia and their vascular integration and significantly contributed to the neovascularization capacity of infused bone marrow Sca-1+/Lin– or VEGF R2+/Lin– progenitor cells in the mouse model of hind limb ischemia as demonstrated using the ?2–/– progenitor cell populations; (e) stimulation of ex vivo–expanded human EPCs by preincubation with an activating ?2-integrin antibody significantly enhanced the homing of EPCs to sites of ischemia and EPC-induced neovascularization. Therefore, the present paper unravels a novel function of the ?2-integrin subunit CD18 for neovascularization exceeding its well-known function in innate and adaptive immune responses.
Increasing evidence suggests that ?2-integrins are not only expressed on differentiated leukocytes but also on hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (34, 35). Our in vitro data suggest that ?2-integrins expressed on EPCs mediate homing functions such as endothelial adhesion and transmigration. Moreover, ?2-integrins contribute to the in vivo homing of bone marrow–derived progenitor cells to ischemic tissue. In line with these data, it has been reported previously that ?2-integrins mediate adhesion and transmigration of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (36–38). In a recent paper assessing in vivo homing of embryonic EPCs derived from cord blood, the circulating cells arrested within tumor microvessels extravasated into the interstitium and incorporated into neovessels, suggesting that adhesion and transmigration are involved in the recruitment of EPCs to sites of tumor angiogenesis (39). Thus, it is conceivable to speculate that ex vivo–expanded adult EPCs and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells may engage similar pathways for recruitment to sites of ischemia and incorporation into newly forming vessels.
Our in vivo data provide the first evidence for a direct participation of ?2-integrins in neovascularization processes and particularly in stem/progenitor cell–mediated, ischemia-induced vasculogenesis. Adamis and colleagues previously highlighted the role of ?2-integrins for corneal and choroidal angiogenesis induced by injury (40, 41). In both studies, ?2–/– mice displayed a reduced inflammation-associated angiogenic response after injury and these effects were associated with reduced inflammatory cell infiltrates (40, 41). Yet, no incorporation of leukocytes into new vessels was reported in these studies. Moreover, the same group demonstrated that, in the case of retinal ischemia, leukocyte–endothelial cell interactions contribute to the development of ischemia by inducing vascular obliteration via Fas ligand–mediated endothelial cell apoptosis (42). In contrast with these findings, our data provide evidence that, during hind limb ischemia, intravenous infusion of bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor cells leads to incorporation of the transplanted cells in newly formed vessels and to improvement of neovascularization in an at least partially ?2-integrin–dependent manner. As opposed to EPCs, infusion of inflammatory cells, such as monocytes/macrophages, had only a slight if any effect on the neovascularization of ischemic limbs in the model of hind limb ischemia in athymic mice (25). Thus, our results support a novel direct function of ?2-integrins in progenitor cell–induced vasculogenesis during ischemia, which is distinct from the indirect role of ?2-integrins in the inflammation-associated angiogenesis described by Adamis and colleagues (40, 41). Because the ?2–/– mice display no defect in the mobilization of progenitor cells (43), the neovascularization defect in the ?2–/– mice in the model of hind limb ischemia is most conceivably mediated by a homing defect of progenitor cells into ischemic tissue.
Interestingly, our present data indicate that the recruitment of hematopoietic progenitor cells to sites of ischemia is mediated at least in part by different mechanisms compared with the homing of infused cells into the bone marrow of lethally irradiated recipient mice, which is predominantly mediated via 4?1 (17, 43). In this context, ?2-integrins only act in a synergistic manner together with the 4?1-integrin. Our finding that ?2-integrin deficiency does not completely block homing and neovascularization improvement after infusion of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells suggests that other mechanisms may additionally be involved in these processes. We cannot exclude that 4?1-integrin partially compensates for the lack of ?2-integrin during in vivo homing of Sca-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells. Interestingly, the homing of inflammatory cells during pneumonia or myocardial ischemia in ?2–/– mice is mediated by the 4?1-integrin (44, 45). Moreover, the initial cell arrest of embryonic progenitor cell homing during tumor angiogenesis was suggested to be mediated by E- and P-selectin and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (39). Yet, it is important to underscore that this work was performed with embryonic EPCs, whereas we used adult EPCs and bone marrow stem/progenitor cells. It is likely that different cell types may use distinct mechanisms for homing to sites of ischemia. In addition, it is well established that interactions of selectins with selectin–ligands mediate the rolling of cells on the surface of endothelial cells as the initial step of homing (21). Further studies are needed to elucidate a potentially synergistic role of other adhesion molecules and their counterligands for the multistep recruitment process of adult endothelial progenitor and stem cells to ischemic tissue.
Regardless of potentially additive mechanisms involved in the recruitment of stem/progenitor cells to areas of ischemia, our data clearly demonstrate that preincubation of EPCs with a ?2-integrin–activating antibody markedly enhanced the incorporation of transplanted EPCs in vessels and the neovascularization of ischemic limbs. The peripheral blood–derived EPCs used in the present paper are already used in clinical trials to improve neovascularization in patients with ischemic heart diseases (15). Thus, our results could have important clinical implications as they disclose a mechanism to enhance homing of EPCs and, thereby, improve neovascularization capacity of infused EPCs.
In summary, the present paper demonstrates for the first time a critical role of ?2-integrins in vitro and in vivo for homing and neovascularization capacity of endothelial progenitor and hematopoietic progenitor cells. Moreover, our results show that activation of ?2-integrins appears to be a feasible and promising tool to improve the efficacy of EPC-induced neovascularization. A better understanding of the homing mechanisms of EPCs may lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies for improvement of vasculogenesis in patients with ischemic diseases.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated by density–gradient centrifugation with Ficoll from peripheral blood of healthy human volunteers as described previously (46). Immediately after isolation, total MNCs (8 x 106 cells/ml medium; cell density 2.5 x 106 cells/cm2) were plated on culture dishes coated with 10 μg/ml human fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich) and maintained in endothelial basal medium (Cambrex) supplemented with 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 12 μg/ml bovine brain extract, 50 μg/ml gentamycin, 50 ng/ml amphotericin B, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, and 20% FCS. After 3 d, nonadherent cells were removed, and adherent cells were incubated in medium for another 24 h before initiation of the experiments. EPCs were characterized by dual staining for 1,1'–dioctadecyl–3,3',3'–tetramethylindo-carbocyanine–labeled acetyl low-density lipoprotein, lectin, and expression of endothelial markers KDR, VE-cadherin, and vWF (25).
Sca-1+/Lin– cells were purified from BM MNCs from wild-type and CD18–/– mice by negative selection using a cocktail of biotinylated antibodies to lineage markers (Lineage cell depletion kit, mouse; Miltenyi Biotec) for 10 min at 4°C followed by antibiotin microbeads for 15 min (Miltenyi Biotec). The Lin– BM cells were incubated with anti–Sca-1 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) for 15 min and Sca-1+/Lin– BM cells were collected (7). To obtain VEGFR2+ Lin– cells, Lin– cells were incubated with biotinylated Flk-1 antibodies (DSB-X biotin protein labeling kit; Molecular Probes; antibody was obtained from BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 4°C followed by antibiotin microbeads for 15 min.
HUVECs were purchased from Cambrex and cultured in endothelial basal medium supplemented with 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 12 μg/ml bovine brain extract, 50 μg/ml gentamycin, 50 ng/ml amphotericin-B, 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, and 10% FCS until the third passage. After detachment with trypsin, cells (4 x 105 cells) were grown in 6-cm cell culture dishes or 96-well plates for at least 18 h as described previously (47).
Oligonucleotide microarrays, FACS
10 μg of total RNA was hybridized to the HG-U95Av2 microarray (9670 human genes; Affymetrix, Inc.). The standard protocol used for sample preparation and microarray processing is available from Affymetrix, Inc. Expression data were analyzed using Microarray Suite version 5.0 (Affymetrix, Inc.) and GeneSpring version 4.2 (Silicon Genetics). 3 x 105 human EPCs, peripheral blood, or isolated Sca-1+/Lin– cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with FITC- or PE-labeled antibodies (anti-CD11a, -CD11b, -CD11c, -CD18, –Sca-1, and –c-kit; BD Biosciences; anti-vWF was obtained from Acris) or CBRM1/5-antibody (BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 37°C. The mAb24 antibody (provided by N. Hogg, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, England, UK) was incubated for 30 min at 4°C and detected with a secondary FITC-labeled goat anti–mouse antibody (DakoCytomation). Surface expression was quantified using a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences).
Adhesion, transmigration experiments
Cell–cell adhesion
Cell–cell adhesion was performed as described previously (48, 49). Confluent HUVEC monolayers were stimulated with TNF- (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h. Ex vivo–expanded EPCs were stained with Cell Tracker green-CMFDA (Molecular Probes) and were resolved in adhesion buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Hepes, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.05% BSA, pH 7.4). A total of 105 EPCs/well (in 100 μl adhesion buffer) was added to the HUVEC monolayers in the absence or presence of blocking monoclonal ?2-integrin antibodies (clone IB4; Qbiogene; or mAb 60.3; J. Harlan, University of Washington, Seattle, WA), murine isotype control antibodies (Qbiogene), inhibitory agents cyclic RGD peptide or VLA-4 inhibitor (4-[{2-methyl-phenyl}aminocarbonyl]aminophenyl)acetyl-fibronectin-CS-1 fragment (1980–1983). After 20 min of incubation (37°C), the plates were washed twice with adhesion buffer at room temperature to remove nonadherent cells. Adherent cell tracker green-labeled EPCs were quantified in triplicates on a fluorescence plate reader (Fluostat; BMG Lab Technologies).
Cell–matrix adhesion
Cell–matrix adhesion was performed as described previously (48, 49). 96-well plates were coated overnight (4°C) with 10 μg/ml human fibrinogen (Enzyme Research Laboratories) or soluble recombinant human ICAM-1 (Bender MedSystems) and blocked with 1% (wt/vol) BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Ex vivo–expanded human EPCs in adhesion buffer were seeded at 1.2 x 105 cells/well in 100 μl in the absence or presence of 2 mM MnCl2 or activating human ?2-integrin antibody (clone KIM185; M. Robinson, Celltech Ltd., Slough, England, UK) and were incubated with blocking ?2-integrin mAb (clone IB4 or mAb 60.3) or murine isotype control antibodies (Qbiogene) for 20 min at 37°C. After removal of nonadherent cells by two washing steps, adhesion was quantified in triplicates by counting adherent cells in five randomly selected fields per well (magnification, 20; Axiovert 100; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.).
Transmigration
Transendothelial migration was performed as described previously (50) using 6.5-mm transwell filters with 8-μm pore size (Costar). After inserts were coated with 0.2% gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich), HUVECs were seeded on transwell filters and cultivated for 48 h before the experiments were performed in a humidified atmosphere (37°C, 5% CO2). At the beginning of the experiment, 600 μl of migration assay medium (serum-free RPMI 1640 in the absence or presence of MCP-1, SDF1, or VEGF; R&D Systems) was added to the lower compartment of the transwell system. EPCs (5 x 105 in 100 μL) were added to the top compartment in the presence or absence of 30 μg/ml of blocking anti–?2-integrin antibody (mAb 60.3), anti–?1-integrin antibody (clone 6S6; Chemicon), anti–4-integrin antibody (clone HP2.1; Immunotech), murine isotype control antibodies (Qbiogene), or RGD peptides. After 18 h at 37°C, the number of cells transmigrated to the bottom compartment was quantified in duplicates with a cell counter (CASY-Counter; Sch?rfe-System). All inserts were fixed and stained to confirm the confluence of the endothelial monolayer.
Animal experiments
Mice.
8-wk-old ?2–/– mice and their age-matched wild-type littermates (either 129/Sv or C57BL/6J) were generated as described previously (51). All mice were genotyped by Southern blot analysis (51) and maintained under pathogen-free conditions. Athymic NMRI nude mice (6–8 wk) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. The animal experiments were approved from the Regional Board of Land Hessen, Germany.
Model of hind limb ischemia
The proximal femoral artery, including the superficial and the deep branch as well as the distal saphenous artery, were ligated. In transplantation experiments, progenitor cells were intravenously injected in nude mice 24 h after induction of limb ischemia. Human EPCs were pretreated with 20 μg/ml activating ?2-integrin antibody (clone KIM 185) or isotype control antibody for 30 min at 37°C and washed twice to remove unbound antibodies before injection (105 EPCs/mouse). In some experiments, sex-mismatched murine Sca-1+/Lin– or Flk-1+/Lin– bone marrow cells from male ?2–/– or wild-type mice were used. After 2 wk, we calculated the ischemic (right) versus normal (left) limb blood flow ratio using a Laser Doppler blood flow imager (Moor Instruments).
Histology.
The capillary density and the number and size of conductant vessels in the semimembraneous and adductor muscles were determined using 8-μm cryosections. Endothelial cells were identified with the panendothelial marker MECA-32 followed by donkey anti–rat IgG Alexa488 or CD31-FITC (BD Biosciences). Injected human EPCs were identified by costaining for HLA-ABC (allophycocyanin labeled; BD Biosciences) and vWF (Acris). Male murine BM-derived cells were identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the murine Y-chromosome (Cy3-labeled probe: Cambio; reference 7). Nuclei were stained with Sytox (Molecular Probes). Images were obtained by confocal microscopy (LSM 510; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.).
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD or SEM. Comparisons between groups were analyzed by Student's t test (two-sided) or analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment for experiments with more than two subgroups (SPSS 11.5 software). p-values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Muhly-Reinholz, T. R?xe, and M. N?her for their excellent technical assistance. Moreover, we thank Drs. N. Hogg, J. Harlan, and M. Robinson for providing the antibodies mAb24, mAb60.3, and KIM185, respectively.
This work was supported by the Forschergruppe 501 (He 3044/2-2 to C. Heeschen) and the Alfried Krupp-Stiftung (to S. Dimmeler). K. Sasaki was in part supported by the Japan Heart Foundation/Bayer Yakuhin Research Grant Abroad. The work of K. Scharffetter-Kochanek was funded in party by the Collaborative Research Center SFB497-C7, Ulm.
References
Carmeliet, P. 2000. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat. Med. 6:389–395.
Asahara, T., T. Murohara, A. Sullivan, M. Silver, R. van der Zee, T. Li, B. Witzenbichler, G. Schatteman, and J.M. Isner. 1997. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 275:964–967.
Shi, Q., S. Rafii, M.H. Wu, E.S. Wijelath, C. Yu, A. Ishida, Y. Fujita, S. Kothari, R. Mohle, L.R. Sauvage, et al. 1998. Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood. 92:362–367.
Asahara, T., H. Masuda, T. Takahashi, C. Kalka, C. Pastore, M. Silver, M. Kearne, M. Magner, and J.M. Isner. 1999. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ. Res. 85:221–228.
Grant, M.B., W.S. May, S. Caballero, G.A. Brown, S.M. Guthrie, R.N. Mames, B.J. Byrne, T. Vaught, P.E. Spoerri, A.B. Peck, and E.W. Scott. 2002. Adult hematopoietic stem cells provide functional hemangioblast activity during retinal neovascularization. Nat. Med. 8:607–612.
Rafii, S., and D. Lyden. 2003. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat. Med. 9:702–712.
Aicher, A., C. Heeschen, C. Mildner-Rihm, C. Urbich, C. Ihling, K. Technau-Ihling, A.M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler. 2003. Essential role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase for mobilization of stem and progenitor cells. Nat. Med. 9:1370–1376.
Takahashi, T., C. Kalka, H. Masuda, D. Chen, M. Silver, M. Kearney, M. Magner, J.M. Isner, and T. Asahara. 1999. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat. Med. 5:434–438.(Emmanouil Chavakis1, Alex)